Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T09:33:34.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Statistics of local Reynolds number in box turbulence: ratio of inertial to viscous forces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2021

Yukio Kaneda*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Mathematics, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan
Takashi Ishihara
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan
Koji Morishita
Affiliation:
SOUM Corporation, Tokyo 151-0072, Japan
Mitsuo Yokokawa
Affiliation:
Graduate School of System Informatics, Kobe University, Kobe 657-0013, Japan
Atsuya Uno
Affiliation:
RIKEN Center for Computational Science, Kobe 650-0047, Japan
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

In high-Reynolds-number turbulence the spatial distribution of velocity fluctuation at small scales is strongly non-uniform. In accordance with the non-uniformity, the distributions of the inertial and viscous forces are also non-uniform. According to direct numerical simulation (DNS) of forced turbulence of an incompressible fluid obeying the Navier–Stokes equation in a periodic box at the Taylor microscale Reynolds number $R_\lambda \approx 1100$, the average $\langle R_{loc}\rangle$ over the space of the ‘local Reynolds number’ $R_ {loc}$, which is defined as the ratio of inertial to viscous forces at each point in the flow, is much smaller than the conventional ‘Reynolds number’ given by $Re \equiv UL/\nu$, where $U$ and $L$ are the characteristic velocity and length of the energy-containing eddies, and $\nu$ is the kinematic viscosity. While both conditional averages of the inertial and viscous forces for a given squared vorticity $\omega ^{2}$ increase with $\omega ^{2}$ at large $\omega ^{2}$, the conditional average of $R_ {loc}$ is almost independent of $\omega ^{2}$. A comparison of the DNS field with a random structureless velocity field suggests that the increase in the conditional average of $R_ {loc}$ with $\omega ^{2}$ at large $\omega ^{2}$ is suppressed by the Navier–Stokes dynamics. Something similar is also true for the conditional averages for a given local energy dissipation rate per unit mass. Certain features of intermittency effects such as that on the $Re$ dependence of $\langle R_{loc}\rangle$ are explained by a multi-fractal model by Dubrulle (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 867, 2019, P1).

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chen, H., Herring, J.R., Kerr, R.M. & Kraichnan, R.H. 1989 Non-Gaussian statistics in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids A: Fluid Dyn. 1 (11), 18441854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, P.A. 2004 Turbulence, an Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dubrulle, B. 2019 Beyond Kolmogorov cascades. J. Fluid Mech. 867, P1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faller, H., et al. 2021 On the nature of intermittency in a turbulent von Kármán flow. J. Fluid Mech. 914, A2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, U. 1995 Turbulence, the Legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, U. & Vergassola, M. 1991 A prediction of the multifractal model: the intermediate dissipation range. Europhys. Lett. 14, 439444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, T., Gotoh, T. & Kaneda, Y. 2009 Study of high-Reynolds number isotropic turbulence by direct numerical simulation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 165180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, T., Kaneda, Y., Morishita, K., Yokokawa, M. & Uno, A. 2020 Second-order velocity structure functions in direct numerical simulations of turbulence with $R_\lambda$ up to 2250. Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 104608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, T., Kaneda, Y., Yokokawa, M., Itakura, K. & Uno, A. 2007 Small-scale statistics in high-resolution direct numerical simulation of turbulence: Reynolds number dependence of one-point velocity gradient statistics. J. Fluid Mech. 592, 335367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, T., Morishita, K., Yokokawa, M., Uno, A. & Kaneda, Y. 2016 Energy spectrum in high-resolution direct numerical simulations of turbulence. Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 082403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaneda, Y. & Morishita, K. 2013 Small-scale statistics and structure of turbulence – in the light of high resolution direct numerical simulation, 2013. In Ten Chapters in Turbulence (ed. by P.A. Davidson, Y. Kaneda & K.R. Sreenivasan), pp. 1–42. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kida, S. & Yanase, S. 1999 Turbulence Dynamics. Asakura (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A.N. 1962 A refinement of previous hypotheses concerning the local structure of turbulence in a viscous incompressible fluid at high Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 13, 8285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraichnan, R.H. & Panda, R. 1988 Depression of nonlinearity in decaying isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 31, 23952397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, L.D. & Lifshitz, E.M. 1987 Fluid Mechanics, 2nd edn. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Monin, A.S. & Yaglom, A.M. 1975 Statistical Fluid Mechanics: Mechanics of Turbulence, vol. 2. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Orszag, S.A. 1977 Lectures on the statistical theory of turbulence. In Fluid Dynamics: Les Houches 1973 (ed. R. Balian & J.-L. Peube), pp. 235–374. Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
She, Z.-S., Jackson, E. & Orszag, S.A. 1991 Structure and dynamics of homogeneous turbulence: models and simulations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 434, 101124.Google Scholar
Tennekes, H. 1975 Eulerian and Lagrangian time microscales in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 67, 561567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsinober, A. 2009 An informal Conceptual Introduction to Turbulence, 2nd edn. of An Informal Introduction to Turbulence. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, P.K., Sreenivasan, K.R. & Pope, S.B. 2018 Effects of finite spatial and temporal resolution in direct numerical simulations of incompressible isotropic turbulence. Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 064603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar