Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T16:52:01.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sound generated from the interruption of a steady flow by a supersonically moving aerofoil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

J. E. Ffowcs Williams  and
Y. P. Guo
J. E. Ffowcs Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
Y. P. Guo
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines a flow–aerofoil interaction problem that we believe is likely to be an important issue in advanced aircraft propulsion systems involving supersonic propellers. They are potentially noisy and it is important to identify the mechanism by which they generate noise so that they can be optimized for acceptable operation. One of the most potent sources of noise lies in the possibility that a second stage propeller blade cuts through the core of the tip vortex shed from a first stage blade. Then suddenly the streaming core flow must adjust to the boundary constraints of that second stage blade, and the adjustment will inevitably involve compressive waves that escape as sound. How strong these sound waves are, how long their life is and where they go to are important questions, the answers to some of which are obtained in this paper. We examine here what we think is a canonical problem and determine the level and directionality of the sound generated by the interruption of the axial vortex-core flow by a supersonic blade. The principal sound is launched in the Mach-wave direction, where the pressure pulse has an amplitude that decreases much more slowly than it would from spherical spreading. This pressure pulse can reach a distant observer with a very large amplitude, 160 dB or higher being typical. The peak sound pressures are found to be independent of blade speed at high supersonic tip velocity, while the energy radiated in the pulse, because of its reducing duration, attenuates as the supersonic speed increases. This aspect gives grounds for believing that the higher the speed, the quieter will be the stage interaction sound of a contrarotating supersonic propeller.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 195 , October 1988 , pp. 113 - 135
Copyright
© 1988 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amiet R. K. 1986a Airfoil gust response and the sound produced by airfoil–vortex interaction. J. Sound Vib. 107, 487–506.Google Scholar
Amiet R. K. 1986b Intersection of a jet by an infinite span airfoil. J. Sound Vib. 111, 499–503.Google Scholar
Cannell, P. & Ffowcs Williams J. E. 1973 Radiation from line vortex filaments exhausting from a two-dimensional semi-infinite duct. J. Fluid Mech. 58, 65–80.Google Scholar
Crighton D. G. 1985 The Kutta condition in unsteady flow. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 17, 411–445.Google Scholar
Dowling, A. P. & Ffowcs Williams J. E. 1983 Sound and Sources of Sound. Ellis Horwood.
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. & Lovely, D. J. 1975 Sound radiation into uniformly flowing fluid by compact surface vibration. J. Fluid Mech. 71, 689–700.Google Scholar
Gradshteyn, I. S. & Ryzhik I. M. 1980 Table of Integrals, Series and Products (corrected and enlarged edition). Academic.
Hill D. C. 1986 Starting mechanics of an evanescent wave field. J. Fluid Mech. 165, 319–333.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, H. & Jeffreys B. 1956 Methods of Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press.
Jones D. S. 1982 The Theory of Generalized Functions. Cambridge University Press.
Kármán von, T. & Sears W. R. 1938 Airfoil theory for non-uniform motion. Aeronaut. Sci. 5, 379–390.Google Scholar
Levine H. 1987 Acoustic power output from moving point singularities. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81, 1695–1702.Google Scholar
Miles J. E. 1959 The Potential Theory of Unsteady Supersonic Flow. Cambridge University Press.
Taylor G. I. 1942 The motion of a body in water when subject to a sudden impulse. In Scientific Papers of G. I. Taylor (ed. G. K. Batchelor), vol. 3, pp. 306–308. Cambridge University Press.
Temple G. 1953 Unsteady motions, Modern Developments in Fluid Dynamics: High Speed Flow (ed. L. Howarth). Clarendon.
Ward G. N. 1955 Linearized Theory of High Speed Flow. Cambridge University Press.