Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:14:45.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Slender-body theory for particles of arbitrary cross-section in Stokes flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

G. K. Batchelor
G. K. Batchelor
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A rigid body whose length (2l) is large compared with its breadth (represented by R0) is straight but is otherwise of arbitrary shape. It is immersed in fluid whose undisturbed velocity, at the position of the body and relative to it, may be either uniform, corresponding to translational motion of the body, parallel or perpendicular to the body length, or a linear function of distance along the body length, corresponding to an ambient pure straining motion or to rotational motion of the body. Inertia forces are negligible. It is possible to represent the body approximately by a distribution of Stokeslets over a line enclosed by the body; and then the resultant force required to sustain translational motion, the net stresslet strength in a straining motion, and the resultant couple required to sustain rotational motion, can all be calculated. In the first approximation the Stokeslet strength density F(x) is independent of the body shape and is of order μUε, where U is a measure of the undisturbed velocity and ε = (log 2l/R0)−1. In higher approximations, F(x) depends on both the body cross-section and the way in which it varies along the length. From an investigation of the ‘inner’ flow field near one section of the body, and the condition that it should join smoothly with the ‘outer’ flow which is determined by the body as a whole, it is found that a given shape and size of the local cross-section is equivalent, in all cases of longitudinal relative motion, to a circle of certain radius, and, in all cases of transverse relative motion, to an ellipse of certain dimensions and orientation. The equivalent circle and the equivalent ellipse may be found from certain boundary-value problems for the harmonic and biharmonic equations respectively. The perimeter usually provides a better measure of the magnitude of the effect of a non-circular shape of a cross-section than its area. Explicit expressions for the various integral force parameters correct to the order of ε2 are presented, together with iterative relations which allow their determination to the order of any power of ε. For a body which is ‘longitudinally elliptic’ and has uniform cross-sectional shape, the force parameters are given explicitly to the order of any power of ε, and, for a cylindrical body, to the order of ε3.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , 26 November 1970 , pp. 419 - 440
Copyright
© 1970 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. 1954 The skin friction on infinite cylinders moving parallel to their length. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 7, 179.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1970 The stress system in a suspension of force-free particles. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 545.Google Scholar
Berry, A. & Swain, L. M. 1923 On the steady motion of a cylinder through infinite viscous fluid. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 102, 766.Google Scholar
Broersma, S. 1960a Rotational diffusion coefficient of a cylindrical particle. J. Chem. Phys. 32, 1626.Google Scholar
Broersma, S. 1960b Viscous force constant for a closed cylinder. J. Chem. Phys. 32, 1632.Google Scholar
Burgers, J. M. 1938 On the motion of small particles of elongated form suspended in a viscous liquid. Chap. III of Second Report of Viscosity and Plasticity. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet., Verhand. (Eerste Sectie), 16, 113.Google Scholar
Cox, R. G. 1970a The motion of long slender bodies in a viscous fluid. 1. General theory. J. Fluid Mech. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Cox, R. G. 1970b The motion of long slender bodies in a viscous fluid. 2. Shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Goldsmith, H. L. & Mason, S. G. 1967 The microrheology of dispersions. Rheology: Theory and Applications, Vol. 4. (Ed. F. R. Eirich) Academic.
Happel, J. & Brenner, H. 1965 Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics. Prentice-Hall.
Jeffery, G. B. 1922 The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 102, 161.Google Scholar
Ladyzhenskaya, O. A. 1963 The Mathematical Theory of Viscous Incompressible Flow. Gordon and Breach.
Lamb, H. 1932 Hydrodynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Oseen, C. W. 1927 Neuere Methoden und Ergebnisse in der Hydrodynamik. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft M.B.H.
Taylor, G. I. 1969 Motion of axisymmetric bodies in viscous fluids. Problems of Hydrodynamics and Continuum Mechanics. S.I.A.M. Publications, p. 718.Google Scholar
Tillett, J. P. K. 1970 Axial and transverse Stokes flow past slender bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 401.Google Scholar
Tuck, E. O. 1964 Some methods for flows past slender bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 18, 619.Google Scholar
Tuck, E. O. 1970 Toward the calculation and minimization of Stokes drag on bodies of arbitrary shape. Trans. Inst. Engrs Aust. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Ward, G. N. 1955 Linearized Theory of Steady High-Speed Flow, chap. 9. Cambridge University Press.