Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:28:02.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shape of retracting foils that model morphing bodies controls shed energy and wake structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2016

S. C. Steele*
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
J. M. Dahl
Affiliation:
Ocean Engineering, University of Rhode Island, 215 South Ferry Road, Narragansett, RI 02882, USA
G. D. Weymouth
Affiliation:
Southampton Marine and Maritime Institute, University of Southampton, University Rd, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
M. S. Triantafyllou
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

The flow mechanisms of shape-changing moving bodies are investigated through the simple model of a foil that is rapidly retracted over a spanwise distance as it is towed at constant angle of attack. It is shown experimentally and through simulation that by altering the shape of the tip of the retracting foil, different shape-changing conditions may be reproduced, corresponding to: (i) a vanishing body, (ii) a deflating body and (iii) a melting body. A sharp-edge, ‘vanishing-like’ foil manifests strong energy release to the fluid; however, it is accompanied by an additional release of energy, resulting in the formation of a strong ring vortex at the sharp tip edges of the foil during the retracting motion. This additional energy release introduces complex and quickly evolving vortex structures. By contrast, a streamlined, ‘shrinking-like’ foil avoids generating the ring vortex, leaving a structurally simpler wake. The ‘shrinking’ foil also recovers a large part of the initial energy from the fluid, resulting in much weaker wake structures. Finally, a sharp edged but hollow, ‘melting-like’ foil provides an energetic wake while avoiding the generation of a vortex ring. As a result, a melting-like body forms a simple and highly energetic and stable wake, that entrains all of the original added mass fluid energy. The three conditions studied correspond to different modes of flow control employed by aquatic animals and birds, and encountered in disappearing bodies, such as rising bubbles undergoing phase change to fluid.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alam, M. M., Zhou, Y., Yang, H. X., Guo, H. & Mi, J. 2010 The ultra-low Reynolds number airfoil wake. Exp. Fluids 48 (1), 81103.Google Scholar
Beal, D. N., Hover, F. S., Triantafyllou, M. S., Liao, J. C. & Lauder, G. V. 2006 Passive propulsion in vortex wakes. J. Fluid Mech. 549, 385402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biesheuvel, A. & Hagmeijer, R. 2006 On the force on a body moving in a fluid. Fluid Dyn. Res. 38 (10), 716742.Google Scholar
Birch, J. M. & Dickinson, M. H. 2003 The influence of wing–wake interactions on the production of aerodynamic forces in flapping flight. J. Expl Biol. 206, 22572272.Google Scholar
Burgers, J. M. 1921 On the resistance of fluids and vortex motion. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akad. van Wetenschappen Proc. B Phys. Sci. 23, 774782.Google Scholar
Childress, S., Vanderberghe, N. & Zhang, J. 2006 Hovering of a passive body in an oscillating airflow. Phys. Fluids 18, 117103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, M. 2003 Animal locomotion: how to walk on water? Nature 424, 621622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dong, H., Bozkurttas, M., Mittal, R., Madden, P. & Lauder, G. V. 2010 Computational modelling and analysis of the hydrodynamics of a highly deformable fish pectoral fin. J. Fluid Mech. 645, 345373.Google Scholar
Drucker, E. G. & Lauder, G. V. 2000 A hydrodynamic analysis of fish swimming speed: wake structure and locomotor force in slow and fast labriform swimmers. J. Expl Biol. 203, 23792393.Google Scholar
Eames, I. 2008 Disappearing bodies and ghost vortices. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 366, 22192232.Google Scholar
Gopalkrishnan, R., Triantafyllou, M. S., Triantafyllou, G. S. & Barrett, D. S. 1994 Active vorticity control in a shear flow using a flapping foil. J. Fluid Mech. 274, 121.Google Scholar
Hedenstrom, A., Johansson, L. C. & Spedding, G. R. 2006 Bird or bat: comparing airframe design and flight performance. Bioinspir. Biomim. 4, 015001.Google Scholar
Hsieh, S. T. & Lauder, G. V. 2004 Running on water: three-dimensional force generation by basilisk lizards. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 1678416788.Google Scholar
Hu, D. L. & Bush, J. W. M. 2010 The hydrodynamics of water-walking arthropods. J. Fluid Mech. 644, 533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, H. & Sun, M. 2007 Dragonfly forewing–hindwing interaction at various flight speeds and wing phasing. AIAA J. 45 (2), 508511.Google Scholar
Huffard, C. L. 2006 Locomotion by abdopus aculeatus (cephalopoda: Octopodidae): walking the line between primary and secondary defenses. J. Expl Biol. 209, 36973707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, J. C. R. & Eames, I. 2002 The disappearance of viscous and laminar wakes in complex flows. J. Fluid Mech. 457, 111132.Google Scholar
Jeong, J. & Hussain, F. 1995 On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 285, 6994.Google Scholar
Kanso, E. 2009 Swimming due to transverse shape deformations. J. Fluid Mech. 631, 127148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, F. 1910 Über die bildung von wirbeln in reibungslosen flüssigkeiten. Z. Math. Physik 58, 259262.Google Scholar
Lehmann, F. O. 2008 When wings touch wakes: understanding locomotor force control by wake–wing interference in insect wings. J. Expl Biol. 211, 224233.Google Scholar
Lighthill, J. 1975 Mathematical Biofluiddynamics. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, J. 1986 An Informal Introduction to Theoretical Fluid Mechanics, IMA Monograph Series 2. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lindhe Norberg, U. M. & Winter, Y. 2006 Wing beat kinematics of a nectar-feeding bat, glossophaga soricina, flying at different flight speeds and Strouhal numbers. J. Expl Biol. 209, 38873897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maertens, A. P. & Weymouth, G. D. 2015 Accurate Cartesian-grid simulations of near-body flows at intermediate Reynolds numbers. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng 283, 106129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne-Thomson, L. M. 1968 Theoretical Hydrodynamics. Dover.Google Scholar
Morton, B. R. 1984 The generation and decay of vorticity. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 28 (3-4), 277308.Google Scholar
Muller, U. K. & Lentink, D. 2004 Turning on a dime. Science 306, 18991990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muller, U. K. 2004 PHYSIOLOGY: enhanced: turning on a dime. Science 306 (5703), 18991900.Google Scholar
Packard, A. 1969 Jet propulsion and the giant fibre response of loligo. Nature 221, 875877.Google Scholar
Polet, D. T., Rival, D. E. & Weymouth, G. D. 2015 Unsteady dynamics of rapid perching manoeuvres. J. Fluid Mech. 767, 323341.Google Scholar
Raffel, M., Willert, C. E., Wereley, S. T. & Kompenhans, J. 2007 Particle Image Velocimetry: a Practical Guide; with 42 Tables. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramamurti, R., Sandberg, W. C., Lohner, R., Walker, J. A. & Westneat, M. W. 2002 Fluid dynamics of aquatic flight in the bird wrasse: three dimensional unsteady computations with fin deformation. J. Expl Biol. 205, 29973008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spagnolie, S. E. & Shelley, M. J. 2009 Shape changing bodies in fluid: hovering, ratcheting, and bursting. Phys. Fluids 21, 013103.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1953 Formation of a vortex ring by giving an impulse to a circular disk and then dissolving it away. J. Appl. Phys. 24, 104.Google Scholar
Videler, J. J., Stamhuis, E. J. & Povel, G. D. E. 2004 Leading-edge vortex lifts swifts. Science 306 (5703), 19601962.Google Scholar
Wang, J. & Sun, M. 2005 A computational study of the aerodynamics and forewing–hindwing interaction of a model dragonfly in forward flight. J. Expl Biol. 208, 37853804.Google Scholar
Weymouth, G. D., Subramaniam, V. & Triantafyllou, M. S. 2015 Ultra-fast escape maneuver of an octopus-inspired robot. Bioinspir. Biomim. 10, 016016.Google Scholar
Weymouth, G. D. & Yue, D. K. P. 2011 Boundary data immersion method for Cartesian-grid simulations of fluid-body interaction problems. J. Comput. Phys. 230 (16), 62336247.Google Scholar
Weymouth, G. D. & Triantafyllou, M. S. 2012 Global vorticity shedding for a shrinking cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 702, 470487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weymouth, G. D. & Triantafyllou, M. S. 2013 Ultra-fast escape of a deformable jet-propelled body. J. Fluid Mech. 721, 367385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wibawa, M. S., Steele, S. C., Dahl, J. M., Rival, D. E., Weymouth, G. D. & Triantafyllou, M. S. 2012 Global vorticity shedding for a vanishing wing. J. Fluid Mech. 695, 112134.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., Johansson, L. C., von Busse, R., Winter, Y. & Hedenstrom, A. 2010 Kinematics of flight and the relationship to the vortex wake of a pallas’ long tongued bat (glossophaga soricina). J. Expl Biol. 213, 21422153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. Z., Ma, H. Y. & Zhou, M. D. 2006 Vorticity and Vortex Dynamics: with 291 Figures. Springer.Google Scholar
Wu, J. Z. & Wu, J. M. 1993 Interactions between a solid surface and a viscous compressible flow field. J. Fluid Mech. 254, 183211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. Z. & Wu, J. M. 1998 Boundary vorticity dynamics since Lighthill’s 1963 article: review and development. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 10 (1–4), 459474.Google Scholar
Zhu, Q., Wolfgang, M. J., Yue, D. K. P. & Triantafyllou, M. S. 2002 Three-dimensional flow structures and vorticity control in fish-like swimming. J. Fluid Mech. 468, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steele et al. supplementary movie

Wake visualization using simulation results of a retracting square-tipped foil. Within each panel, left side shows vortex cores colored by the intensity; right side shows non-dimensional vorticity. Flow is from left to right; foil is retracted in the vertical direction.

Download Steele et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 3.4 MB

Steele et al. supplementary movie

Wake visualization using simulation results of a retracting square-tipped foil. Within each panel, left side shows vortex cores colored by the intensity; right side shows non-dimensional vorticity. Flow is from left to right; foil is retracted in the vertical direction.

Download Steele et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 991.5 KB

Steele et al. supplementary movie

Wake visualization using simulation results of a retracting streamlined-tipped foil. Within each panel, left side shows vortex cores colored by the intensity; right side shows non-dimensional vorticity. Flow is from left to right; foil is retracted in the vertical direction.

Download Steele et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 2.9 MB

Steele et al. supplementary movie

Wake visualization using simulation results of a retracting streamlined-tipped foil. Within each panel, left side shows vortex cores colored by the intensity; right side shows non-dimensional vorticity. Flow is from left to right; foil is retracted in the vertical direction.

Download Steele et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 669.3 KB

Steele et al. supplementary movie

Wake visualization using simulation results of a retracting hollow foil. Within each panel, left side shows vortex cores colored by the intensity; right side shows non-dimensional vorticity. Flow is from left to right; foil is retracted in the vertical direction.

Download Steele et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 3.1 MB

Steele et al. supplementary movie

Wake visualization using simulation results of a retracting hollow foil. Within each panel, left side shows vortex cores colored by the intensity; right side shows non-dimensional vorticity. Flow is from left to right; foil is retracted in the vertical direction.

Download Steele et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 708.2 KB