Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:59:39.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Settling of heated particles in homogeneous turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2016

Ari Frankel ,
H. Pouransari ,
F. Coletti  and
A. Mani
Ari Frankel*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
H. Pouransari
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
F. Coletti
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
A. Mani
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the case of inertial particles heated by thermal radiation while settling by gravity through a turbulent transparent gas. We consider dilute and optically thin regimes in which each particle receives the same heat flux. Numerical simulations of forced homogeneous turbulence are performed taking into account the two-way coupling of both momentum and temperature between the dispersed and continuous phases. Particles much smaller than the smallest flow scales are considered and the point-particle approximation is adopted. The particle Stokes number (based on the Kolmogorov time scale) is of order unity, while the nominal settling velocity is up to an order of magnitude larger than the Kolmogorov velocity, marking a critical difference with previous two-way coupled simulations. It is found that non-heated particles enhance turbulence when their settling velocity is sufficiently high compared to the Kolmogorov velocity. Energy spectra show that the non-heated particle settling impacts both the very small and very large flow scales, while the intermediate scales are weakly affected. When heated, particles shed plumes of buoyant gas, further modifying the turbulence structure. At the considered radiation intensities, clustering is strong but the classic mechanism of preferential concentration is modified, while preferential sweeping is eliminated or even reversed. Particle heating also causes a significant reduction of the mean settling velocity, which is caused by rising buoyant plumes in the vicinity of particle clusters. The turbulent kinetic energy is affected non-monotonically as the radiation intensity is increased due to the competing effects of the downward gravitational force and the upward buoyancy force. The thermal radiation influences all scales of the turbulence. The effects of settling and buoyancy on the turbulence anisotropy are also discussed.

JFM classification

Multiphase and Particle-laden Flows: Multiphase and Particle-laden Flows Multiphase and Particle-laden Flows: Particle/fluid flow
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 792 , 10 April 2016 , pp. 869 - 893
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aliseda, A., Cartellier, A., Hainaux, F. & Lasheras, J. 2002 Effect of preferential concentration on the settling velocity of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 468, 77–105.Google Scholar
Ayyalasomayajula, S., Gylfason, A., Collins, L., Bodenschatz, E. & Warhaft, Z. 2006 Lagrangian measurements of inertial particle accelerations in grid generated wind tunnel turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 144507.Google Scholar
Balachandar, S. & Eaton, J. 2010 Turbulent dispersed multiphase flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bec, J., Biferale, L., Boffetta, G., Celani, A., Cencini, M., Lanotte, A., Musacchio, S. & Toschi, F. 2006 Acceleration statistics of heavy particles in turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 550, 349–358.Google Scholar
Boivin, M., Simonin, O. & Squires, K. 1998 Direct numerical simulation of turbulence modulation by particles in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 375, 235–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosse, T., Kleiser, L., Hartel, C. & Meiburg, E. 2005 Numerical simulation of finite Reynolds number suspension drops settling under gravity. Phys. Fluids 17, 037101.Google Scholar
Bosse, T., L., Kleiser & Meiburg, E. 2006 Small particles in homogeneous turbulence: settling velocity enhancement by two-way coupling. Phys. Fluids 18, 027102.Google Scholar
Bragg, A. & Collins, L. 2014 New insights from comparing statistical theories for inertial particles in turbulence: I. Spatial distribution of particles. New J. Phys. 16, 055013.Google Scholar
Bunner, B. & Tryggvason, G. 2002 Dynamics of homogeneous bubbly flows. Part 1. Rise velocity and microstructure of the bubbles. J. Fluid Mech. 466, 17–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capecelatro, J., Desjardins, O. & Fox, R. 2014 Numerical study of collisional particle dynamics in cluster-induced turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 747, R2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuzzi, J., Hogan, R., Paque, J. & Dobrovolskis, A. 2001 Size-selective concentration of chondrules and other small particles in protoplanetary nebula turbulence. Astrophys. J. 546, 496–508.Google Scholar
Davila, J. & Hunt, J. 2001 Settling of small particles near vortices and in turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 440, 117–145.Google Scholar
Dejoan, A. & Monchaux, R. 2013 Preferential concentration and settling of heavy particles in homogeneous turbulence. Phys. Fluids 25, 013301.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. & Fessler, J. 1994 Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 20, 169–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elghobashi, S. 1994 On predicting particle-laden turbulent flows. Appl. Sci. Res. 52, 309–329.Google Scholar
Elghobashi, S. & Truesdell, G. 1993 On the two-way interaction between homogeneous turbulence and dispersed solid particles. 1: turbulence modification. Phys. Fluids 5, 1790–1801.Google Scholar
Ferenc, J. & Neda, Z. 2007 On the size distribution of Poisson Voronoi cells. Physica A 385, 518–526.Google Scholar
Ferrante, A. & Elghobashi, S. 2003 On the physical mechanisms of two-way coupling in particle-laden isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 15, 315–329.Google Scholar
Gao, H., Li, H. & Wang, L. 2013 Lattice Boltzmann simulation of turbulent flow laden with finite-size particles. Comput. Maths Applics 65, 194–210.Google Scholar
Gibert, M., Xu, H. & Bodenschatz, E. 2012 Where do small, weakly inertial particles go in a turbulent flow? J. Fluid Mech. 698, 160–167.Google Scholar
Good, G., Gerashchenko, S. & Warhaft, Z. 2012 Intermittency and inertial particle entrainment at a turbulent interface: the effect of the large-scale eddies. J. Fluid Mech. 694, 371–398.Google Scholar
Good, G., Ireland, P., Bewley, G., Bodenschatz, E., Collins, L. & Warhaft, Z. 2014 Settling regimes of inertial particles in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 759, R3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goto, S. & Vassilicos, J. 2008 Sweep-stick mechanism of heavy particle clustering in fluid turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 054503.Google Scholar
Grabowski, W. & Wang, L. 2013 Growth of cloud droplets in a turbulent environment. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 45, 293–324.Google Scholar
Gualtieri, P., Picano, F., Sardina, G. & Casciola, C. 2013 Clustering and turbulence modulation in particle-laden shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 715, 134–162.Google Scholar
Hwang, W. & Eaton, J. 2006 Homogeneous and isotropic turbulence modulation by small heavy ( $St\sim 50$ ) particles. J. Fluid Mech. 564, 361–393.Google Scholar
Kajishima, T. & Takiguchi, S. 2002 Interaction between particle clusters and particle-induced turbulence. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 23, 639–646.Google Scholar
Lance, M. & Bataille, J. 1991 Turbulence in the liquid phase of a uniform bubbly air–water flow. J. Fluid Mech. 222, 95–118.Google Scholar
Lazaro, B. & Lasheras, J. 1989 Particle dispersion in a turbulent, plane, free shear layer. Phys. Fluids A 1, 1035–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundgren, T. 2003 Linearly forced isotropic turbulence. In Annual Research Briefs, pp. 461–473. Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Maxey, M 1987 The gravitational settling of aerosol particles in homogeneous turbulence and random flow fields. J. Fluid Mech. 174, 441–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxey, M. & Patel, B. 2001 Localized force representations for particles sedimenting in Stokes flow. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 27, 1603–1626.Google Scholar
Mazzitelli, I. & Lohse, D. 2009 Evolution of energy in flow driven by rising bubbles. Phys. Rev. E 79, 066317.Google Scholar
Mei, R. 1994 Effect of turbulence on the particle settling velocity in the nonlinear drag range. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 20, 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monchaux, R., Bourgoin, M. & Cartellier, A. 2010 Preferential concentration of heavy particles: a Voronoi analysis. Phys. Fluids 22, 103304.Google Scholar
Nielsen, P. 1993 Turbulence effects on the settling of suspended particles. J. Sedim. Petrol. 63, 835–838.Google Scholar
Pares-Sierra, A. & Vallis, G. 1989 A fast semi-direct method for the numerical solution of non-separable elliptic equations in irregular domains. J. Comput. Phys. 82, 398–412.Google Scholar
Poelma, C., Westerweel, J. & Ooms, G. 2007 Particle–fluid interactions in grid-generated turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 589, 315–351.Google Scholar
Pouransari, H., Mortazavi, M. & Mani, A. 2015 Parallel variable-density particle-laden turbulence simulation. In CTR Annual Research Briefs, pp. 43–54. Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Rosales, C. & Meneveau, C. 2005 Linear forcing in numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence: physical space implementations and convergence properties. Phys. Fluids 17, 095106.Google Scholar
Sahu, S., Hardalupas, Y. & Taylor, A. 2014 Droplet-turbulence interaction in a confined polydispersed spray: effect of droplet size and flow length scales on spatial droplet–gas velocity correlations. J. Fluid Mech. 741, 98–138.Google Scholar
Salazar, J., De Jong, J., Cao, L., Woodward, S., Meng, H. & Collins, L. 2008 Experimental and numerical investigation of inertial particle clustering in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 600, 245–256.Google Scholar
Shaw, R. 2003 Particle-turbulence interactions in atmospheric clouds. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35, 183–227.Google Scholar
Squires, K. & Eaton, J. 1991 Particle response and turbulence modification in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 2, 1191–1203.Google Scholar
Sundaram, S. & Collins, L. 1997 A numerical study of the modulation of isotropic turbulence by suspended particles. J. Fluid Mech. 379, 105–143.Google Scholar
Tagawa, Y., Mercado, J., Prakash, V., Calzavarini, E., Sun, C. & Lohse, D. 2012 Three-dimensional Lagrangian Moroni analysis for clustering of particles and bubbles in turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 693, 201–215.Google Scholar
Tan, T. & Chen, Y. 2010 Review of study on solid particle solar receivers. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 14, 265–276.Google Scholar
Tooby, P., Wick, G. & Isaacs, J. 1977 The motion of a small sphere in a rotating velocity field: a possible mechanism for suspending particles in turbulence. J. Geophys. Res. 82, 2096–2100.Google Scholar
Wang, L. & Maxey, M. 1993 Settling velocity and concentration distribution of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 371, 179–205.Google Scholar
Wang, L., Wexler, A. & Zhou, Y. 2000 Statistical mechanical description and modeling of turbulent collision of inertial particles. J. Fluid Mech. 415, 117–153.Google Scholar
Wetchagarun, S. & Riley, J. 2010 Dispersion and temperature statistics of inertial particles in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 22, 063301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. & Lei, U. 1998 The role of the turbulent scales in the settling velocity of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 371, 179–205.Google Scholar
Yang, T. & Shy, S. 2003 The settling velocity of heavy particles in an aqueous near-isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 15, 868–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, T. & Shy, S. 2005 Two-way interaction between solid particles and homogeneous air turbulence: particle settling rate and turbulence modification measurements. J. Fluid Mech. 526, 171–216.Google Scholar
Yoshimoto, H. & Goto, S. 2007 Self-similar clustering of inertial particles in homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 577, 275–286.Google Scholar
Zamansky, R., Coletti, F., Massot, M. & Mani, A. 2014 Radiation induces turbulence in particle-laden fluids. Phys. Fluids 26, 071701.Google Scholar