Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T22:25:28.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-diffusion of bimodal suspensions of hydrodynamically interacting spherical particles in shearing flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Chingyi Chang  and
Robert L. Powell
Chingyi Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
Robert L. Powell
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the average mobilities and long-time self-diffusion coefficients of a suspension of bimodally distributed spherical particles. Stokesian dynamics is used to calculate the particle trajectories for a monolayer of bimodal-sized spheres. Hydrodynamic forces only are considered and they are calculated using the inverse of the grand mobility matrix for far-field many-body interactions and lubrication formulae for near-field effects. We determine both the detailed microstructure (e.g. the pair-connectedness function and cluster formation) and the macroscopic properties (e.g. viscosity and self-diffusion coefficients). The flow of an ‘infinite’ suspension is simulated by considering 25, 49, 64 and 100 particles to be one ‘cell’ of a periodic array. Effects of both the size ratio and the relative fractions of the different-sized particles are examined. For the microstructures, the pair-connectedness function shows that the particles form clusters in simple shearing flow due to lubrication forces. The nearly symmetric angular structures imply the absence of normal stress differences for a suspension with purely hydrodynamic interactions between spheres. For average mobilities at infinite Péclet number, Ds0, our simulation results suggest that the reduction of Ds0 as concentration increases is directly linked to the influence of particle size distribution on the average cluster size. For long-time self-diffusion coefficients, Ds∞, we found good agreement between simulation and experiment (Leighton & Acrovos 1987 a; Phan and Leighton 1993) for monodispersed suspensions. For bimodal suspensions, the magnitude of Ds∞, and the time to reach the asymptotic diffusive behaviour depend on the cluster size formed in the system, or the viscosity of the suspension. We also consider the effect of the initial configuration by letting the spheres be both organized (size segregated) and randomly placed. We find that it takes a longer time for a suspension with an initially organized structure to achieve steady state than one with a random structure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 281 , 25 December 1994 , pp. 51 - 80
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, J. R., Tetlow, N., Graham, A. L., Altobelli, S. A., Fukushima, E., Mondy, L. A. & Stephens, T. S. 1991 Experimental observations of particle migration in concentrated suspensions: Couette flow. J. Rheol. 35, 773–795.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1976 Brownian diffusion of particles with hydrodynamic interaction. J. Fluid Mech. 75, 1–29.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. & Green, J. T. 1972 The hydrodynamic interaction of two small freely-moving spheres in a linear flow field. J. Fluid Mech. 56, 375–400.Google Scholar
Beenakker, C. W. J. & Mazur, P. 1984 Diffusion of spheres in a concentrated suspension II. Physica A 126, 349–370.Google Scholar
Bossis, G. & Brady, J. F. 1984 Dynamic simulation of sheared suspensions. I. General Method. J. Chem. Phys. 80, 5141–5154.Google Scholar
Bossis, G. & Brady, J. F. 1987 Self-diffusion of Brownian particles in concentrated suspensions under shear. J. Chem. Phys. 87, 5437–5448.Google Scholar
Bossis, G. & Brady, J. F. 1989 The rheology of Brownian suspensions. Chem. Phys. 91, 1866–1874.Google Scholar
Bossis, G. & Brady, J. F. 1990 Diffusion and rheology in concentrated suspensions by Stokesian dynamics. In Hydrodynamics of Dispersed Media (ed. J.-P. Hulin, A. M. Cazabat, E. Guyon & F. Carmona). Elsevier.
Brady, J. F. & Bossis, G. 1985 The rheology of concentrated suspensions of spheres in simple shear flow by numerical simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 155, 105–129.Google Scholar
Brady, J. F. & Bossis, G. 1988 Stokesian dynamics. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 111–157.Google Scholar
Brady, J. F., Phillips, R. J., Lester, J. C. & Bossis, G. 1988 Dynamic simulation of hydrodynamically interacting suspensions. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 257–280.Google Scholar
Carnahan, B., Luther, H. A. & Wilkes, J. O. 1969 Applied Numerical Methods. John Wiley & Sons.
Chang, C. 1993 The rheology of bimodal suspensions of hydrodynamically interacting spherical particles. PhD thesis, University of California at Davis.
Chang, C. & Powell, R. L. 1993 Dynamic simulation of bimodal suspensions of hydrodynamically interacting spherical particles. J. Fluid Mech. 253, 1–25.Google Scholar
Chang, C. & Powell, R. L. 1994a The rheology of bimodal hard-sphere dispersions. Phys. Fluids, 6, 1628–1636.Google Scholar
Chang, C. & Powell, R. L. 1994b Calculation of the grand mobility functions for two unequal rigid spheres in low-Reynolds-number flow by the multipole-moment method. Particulate Sci. Technol. (to appear).Google Scholar
Chong, J. S., Christiansen, E. B. & Baer, A. D. 1971 Rheology of concentrated suspensions. J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 15, 2007–2021.Google Scholar
Durlofsky, L. & Brady, J. F. 1989 Dynamic simulation of bounded suspensions of hydrodynamically interacting particles. J. Fluid Mech. 200, 39–67.Google Scholar
Durlofsky, L., Brady, J. F. & Bossis, G. 1987 Dynamic simulation of hydrodynamically interacting particles. J. Fluid Mech. 180, 21–49.Google Scholar
Eckstein, E. C., Brailey, D. G. & Shapiro, A. H. 1977 Self-diffusion of particles in shear flow of a suspension. J. Fluid Mech. 79, 191–208.Google Scholar
Evans, D. J. 1979 The frequency dependent shear viscosity of methane. Molec. Phys. 37, 1745–1754.Google Scholar
Fijnaut, H. M. 1981 Wave vector dependence on the effective diffusion coefficient of Brownian particles. J. Chem. Phys. 74, 6857–6863.Google Scholar
Gadala-Maria, F. & Acrivos, A. 1980 Shear-induced structure in a concentrated suspension of solid spheres. J. Rheol. 24, 799–814.Google Scholar
Gawlinski, E. T. & Stanley, H. E. 1981 Continuum percolation in two dimensions: Monte Carlo tests of scaling and universality for non-interacting discs. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 14, L291–L299.Google Scholar
Glendinning, A. B. & Russel, W. B. 1982 A pairwise additive description of sedimentation and diffusion in concentrated suspensions of hard spheres. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 89, 124–143.Google Scholar
Graham, A. L., Altobelli, S. A., Fukushima, E., Mondy, L. A. & Stephens, T. S. 1991 Note: NMR imaging of shear-induced diffusion and structure in concentrated suspensions undergoing Couette flow. J. Rheol. 35, 191–201.Google Scholar
Hoshen, J. & Kopelman, R. 1976 Percolation and cluster distribution. I. Cluster multiple labeling technique and critical concentration algorithm. Phys. Rev. B 14, 3438–3445.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, D. J. 1992 The extended resistance functions for two unequal rigid spheres in low-Reynolds-number flow. Phys. Fluids A 4, 16–29.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, D. J. & Onishi, Y. 1984 Calculation of the resistance and mobility functions for two unequal rigid spheres in low-Reynolds-number flow. J. Fluid Mech. 139, 261–290.Google Scholar
Kim, I. C. & Torquato, S. 1990 Monte Carlo calculations of connectedness and mean cluster size for bidispersions of overlapping spheres. J. Chem. Phys. 93, 5998–6002.Google Scholar
Kim, S. & Karrila, S. J. 1991 Microhydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Applications. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Koch, D. L. 1989 On hydrodynamic diffusion and drift in sheared suspensions. Phys. Fluids A 1, 1742–1745.Google Scholar
Lee, S. B. & Torquato, S. 1988 Pair connectedness and mean cluster size for continuum-percolation models: Computer-simulation results. J. Chem. Phys. 89, 6427–6433.Google Scholar
Leighton, D. & Acrivos, A. 1987a Measurement of self-diffusion in concentrated suspensions of spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 109–131.Google Scholar
Leighton, D. & Acrivos, A. 1987b The shear-induced migration of particles in concentrated suspensions. J. Fluid Mech. 181, 415–439.Google Scholar
Miller, R. R., Lee, E. & Powell, R. L. 1991 Rheology of solid propellant dispersions. J. Rheol. 35, 901–920.Google Scholar
Nadim, A. 1988 The measurement of shear-induced diffusion in concentrated suspensions with Couette device. Phys. Fluids 31, 2781–2785.Google Scholar
O'Brien, R. W. 1979 A method for the calculation of the effective transport properties of suspensions of interacting particles. J. Fluid Mech. 19, 17–39.Google Scholar
Ottewill, R. H. & Williams, N. St. J. 1987 Study of particle motion in concentrated dispersions by tracer diffusion. Nature 325, 232–234.Google Scholar
Phan, S. E. & Leighton, D. 1993 Measurement of the shear-induced tracer diffusivity in concentrated suspensions. J. Fluid Mech. (submitted).Google Scholar
Phillips, R. J., Armstrong, R. C., Brown, R. A., Graham, A. L. & Abbott, J. R. 1992 A constitutive equation for concentrated suspensions that accounts for shear-induced particle migration. Phys. Fluids A 4, 30–40.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. J., Brady, J. F. & Bossis, G. 1988 Hydrodynamic transport properties of hard-sphere dispersions. I. Suspensions of freely mobile particles. Phys. Fluids 31, 3462–3472.Google Scholar
Pusey, P. N. & Van Megen, W. J. 1983 Measurement of the short-time self-mobility of particles in concentrated suspension. Evidence of many-particle hydrodynamic interactions. J. Phys. Paris 44, 285–291.Google Scholar
Rallison, J. M. & Hinch, E. J. 1986 The effect of particle interactions on dynamic light scattering from a dilute suspension. J. Fluid Mech. 167, 131–168.Google Scholar
Seaton, N. A. & Glandt, E. E. 1987 Aggregation and percolation in a system of adhesive spheres. J. Chem. Phys. 86, 4668–4677.Google Scholar
Sevick, E. M., Monson, P. A. & Ottino, J. M. 1988 Monte Carlo calculations of cluster statistics in continuum models of composite morphology. J. Chem. Phys. 88, 1198–1206.Google Scholar
Van Megen, W., Underwood, S. M. & Snook, I. 1986 Tracer diffusion in concentrated colloidal dispersions. J. Chem. Phys. 85, 4065–1072.Google Scholar
Weinbaum, S., Ganatos, P. & Yan, Z. Y. 1990 Numerical multipole and boundary integral equation techniques in Stokes flow. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 22, 275–316.Google Scholar