Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T09:48:00.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scalar transport and alpha-effect for a family of cat's-eye flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

S. Childress  and
A. M. Soward
S. Childress
Affiliation:
Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, 251 Mercer Street, New York, NY 10012, USA
A. M. Soward
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper we study advection–diffusion of scalar and vector fields for the steady velocity field \[ (u, v, w) = \left(\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y},-\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x},K\psi\right),\quad \psi = \sin x \sin y + \delta \cos x \cos y. \] If δ > 0 the streamlines ψ = constant form a periodic array of oblique cat's-eyes separated by continuous channels carrying finite fluid flux. In the problems treated, advection dominates diffusion, and fields are transported both in thin boundary layers and within the channels. Effective transport of a passive scalar and the alphaeffect generated by interaction of the flow with a uniform magnetic field are examined. For the latter problem, we determine the alpha-matrix as a function of δ. Our results consist of (i) numerical solution of steady problems in the limit of large Reynolds number R with β = δR½ held fixed and O(1), and (ii) analytic asymptotic solutions for large R, obtained using the Wiener–Hopf technique, which are valid for large β. The asymptotic method gives reliable values of the effective diffusion and of alpha-matrices down to β ≈ 1.5.

When β > 0 the transport and alpha-effect are greatly enhanced by flux down the channels. Consequently, the alpha-effect found here may have application to the construction of efficient fast dynamos, but this requires spatial dependence of the mean field and the inclusion of three-dimensional effects, as in the established fast-dynamo analysis with δ = 0.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 205 , August 1989 , pp. 99 - 133
Copyright
© 1989 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anufriyev, A. P. & Fishman, V. M. 1982 Magnetic field structure in the two-dimensional motion of a conducting fluid. Geomag. Aeron. 22, 245–248.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1956 On steady laminar flow with closed streamlines at large Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 177–190.Google Scholar
Benney, D. J. & Bergeron, R. F. 1969 A new class of nonlinear waves in parallel flows. Stud. Appl. Maths 48, 181–204.Google Scholar
Brown, S. N. & Stewartson, K. 1978 The evolution of the critical layer of a Rossby wave. Part II. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 10, 1–24.Google Scholar
Childress, S. 1979 Alpha-effect in flux ropes and sheets. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 20, 172–180 (denoted by ‘C’ in text).Google Scholar
Childress, S. & Soward, A. M. 1985 On the rapid generation of magnetic fields. In Chaos in Astrophysics (ed. J. R. Buchler, J. M. Perdang & E. A. Spiegel). NATO ASI Series C: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Vol. 161, pp. 223–244.
Dombre, T., Frisch, U., Greene, J. M., Hénon, M., Mehr, A. & Soward, A. M. 1986 Chaotic streamlines in the ABC flows. J. Fluid Mech. 167, 353–391.Google Scholar
Galloway, D. & Frisch, U. 1986 Dynamo action in a family of flows with chaotic streamlines. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 36, 53–83.Google Scholar
Lagerstrom, P. A. 1975 Solutions of the Navier–Stokes equation at large Reynolds number. SIAM J. Appl. Maths 28, 202–214.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1978 Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids. Cambridge University Press.
Moffatt, H. K. & Proctor, M. R. E. 1985 Topological constraints associated with fast dynamo action. J. Fluid Mech. 154, 493–507.Google Scholar
Noble, B. 1958 Methods Based on the Wiener–Hopf Technique. Pergamon.
Perkins, F. W. & Zweibel, E. G. 1987 A high magnetic Reynolds number dynamo. Phys. Fluids 30, 1079–1084.Google Scholar
Prandtl, L. 1904 Über Flussigkeitsbewegung bei sehr kleiner Reibung. Proc. 3rd Intl Math. Cong. Heidelberg, pp. 484–491.
Rhines, P. B. & Young, W. R. 1983 How rapidly is a passive scalar mixed within closed streamlines? J. Fluid Mech. 133, 133–145.Google Scholar
Roberts, G. O. 1972 Dynamo action of fluid motions with two-dimensional periodicity. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 271, 411–454.Google Scholar
Soward, A. M. & Childress, S. 1986 Analytic theory of dynamos. Adv. Space Res. 6, 7–18.Google Scholar
Soward, A. M. 1987 Fast dynamo action in steady flow. J. Fluid Mech. 180, 267–295 (denoted by ‘S’ in the text).Google Scholar
Soward, A. M. 1989 On dynamo action in a steady flow at large magnetic Reynolds number. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. (submitted).Google Scholar
Stewartson, K. 1968 On an integral equation. Mathematika 15, 22–29.Google Scholar
Zel'dovich, Ya. B., Ruzmaikin, A. A. & Sokolov, D. D. 1983 Magnetic Fields in Astrophysics. Gordon and Breach.