Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T15:12:08.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of superhydrophobicity in the adhesion of a floating cylinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2009

DUCK-GYU LEE  and
HO-YOUNG KIM
DUCK-GYU LEE
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-744, Korea
HO-YOUNG KIM*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-744, Korea
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Horizontal cylinders floating on liquid surfaces are mundanely observed, whose examples include the legs of aquatic arthropods and floating larvae, twigs and hairs. We study the force and energy required to lift the cylinder clear from the water surface, to evaluate the role of wettability, especially superhydrophobicity, in the adhesion of floating cylinders. We find that a drastic degree of energy saving is achieved when lifting a superhydrophobic cylinder as compared with a cylinder with moderate wettability. This can serve as a starting point to understand how the superhydrophobicity of the legs of water-walking insects help to propel them efficiently.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 624 , 10 April 2009 , pp. 23 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blake, T. D. & Haynes, J. M. 1969 Kinetics of liquid/liquid displacement. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 30, 421–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, J. W. M. & Hu, D. L. 2006 Walking on water: biolocomotion at the interface. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38, 339–369.Google Scholar
Bush, J. W. M., Hu, D. L. & Prakash, M. 2008 The integument of water-walking arthropods: form and function. Adv. Insect Physiol. 34, 117–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, C.-H. & Kim, C.-J. 2006 Large slip of aqueous liquid flow over a nanoengineered superhydrophobic surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 066001.Google Scholar
Derjaguin, B. V. & Dukhin, S. S. 1961 Theory of flotation of small and medium size particles. Trans. Inst. Mining Met. 70, 221–246.Google Scholar
Feng, X.-Q., Gao, X., Wu, Z., Jiang, L. & Zheng, Q.-S. 2007 Superior water repellency of water strider legs with hierarchical structures: experiments and analysis. Langmuir 23, 4892–4896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, X. & Jiang, L. 2004 Water-repellent legs of water striders. Nature 432, 36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, D. L. 2006 The hydrodynamics of water-walking insects and spiders. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Hu, D. L. & Bush, J. W. M. 2005 Meniscus-climbing insects. Nature 437, 733–736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, D. L., Chan, B. & Bush, J. W. M. 2003 The hydrodynamics of water strider locomotion. Nature 424, 663–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, D. L., Prakash, M., Chan, B. & Bush, J. W. M. 2007 Water-walking devices. Exp. Fluids 43, 769–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, J. B. 1998 Surface tension force on a partly submerged body. Phys. Fluids 10, 3009–3010.Google Scholar
Lauga, E. & Stone, H. A. 2003 Effective slip in pressure-driven Stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech. 489, 55–77.Google Scholar
Lee, D.-G. & Kim, H.-Y. 2008 Impact of a superhydrophobic sphere onto water. Langmuir 24, 142–145.Google Scholar
Liu, J.-L., Feng, X.-Q. & Wang, G.-F. 2007 Buoyant force and sinking conditions of a hydrophobic thin rod floating on water. Phys. Rev. E 76, 066103.Google Scholar
Philip, J. 1972 Flows satisfying mixed no-slip and no-shear conditions. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 23, 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapacchietta, A. V. & Neumann, A. W. 1977 Force and free-energy analyses of small particles at fluid interfaces. ii. spheres. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 59, 555–567.Google Scholar
Rapacchietta, A. V., Neumann, A. W. & Omenyi, S. N. 1977 Force and free-energy analyses of small particles at fluid interfaces. i. cylinders. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 59, 541–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Ruijter, M. J., Blake, T. D. & De Coninck, J. 1999 Dynamic wetting studied by molecular modeling simulations of droplet spreading. Langmuir 15, 7836–7847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sbragaglia, M. & Prosperetti, A. 2007 A note on the effective slip properties for microchannel flows with ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Fluids 19, 043603.Google Scholar
Shi, F., Niu, J., Liu, J., Liu, F., Wang, Z., Feng, X.-Q. & Zhang, X. 2007 Towards understanding why a superhydrophobic coating is needed by water striders. Adv. Mater. 19, 2257–2261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Y. S. & Sitti, M. 2007 Surface-tension-driven biologically inspired water strider robots: theory and experiments. IEEE Trans. Robot. 23, 578–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torkkeli, A., Saarilahti, J., Haara, A., Harma, H., Soukka, T. & Tolonen, P. 2001 Electrostatic transportation of water droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces. In Proc. of the 14th IEEE Intl Conf. on MEMS, Interlaken, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Vella, D., Lee, D.-G. & Kim, H.-Y. 2006 The load supported by small floating objects. Langmuir 22, 5979–5981.Google Scholar
Vella, D. & Metcalfe, P. D. 2007 Surface tension dominated impact. Phys. Fluids 19, 072108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar