Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:20:40.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Role of Klebanoff modes in active flow control of separation: direct numerical simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2018

Shirzad Hosseinverdi Open the ORCID record for Shirzad Hosseinverdi [Opens in a new window]  and
Hermann F. Fasel
Shirzad Hosseinverdi*
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Hermann F. Fasel
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Our previous research has shown that an active flow control strategy using two-dimensional (2-D) harmonic blowing and suction with properly chosen frequency and amplitude can significantly reduce the separation region, delay transition to turbulence and can even relaminarize the flow. How such effective flow control for transition delay and relaminarization is affected by free-stream turbulence (FST) remains an open question. In order to answer this question, highly resolved direct numerical simulations (DNS) are carried out where very low-amplitude isotropic FST fluctuations are introduced at the inflow boundary of the computational domain. With FST the effectiveness of the flow control is not diminished, and the extent of the separated flow region is reduced by the same amount as for the zero FST case. However, a striking difference observed in the DNS is the fact that in the presence of even very low levels of FST, the flow transitions shortly downstream of the reattachment location of the bubble, contrary to the case without FST. It appears that this different behaviour for even very small levels of FST is caused by an interaction between the high-amplitude 2-D disturbances introduced by the flow control forcing and 3-D Klebanoff modes (K-modes) that are generated by the FST. The streamwise elongated streaks due to the K-modes cause a spanwise-periodic modulation of the basic flow and subsequently of the primary 2-D wave. The disturbances associated with this modulation exhibit strong growth and initiate the breakdown process to turbulence. Linear secondary instability investigations with respect to low-frequency 3-D disturbances are carried out based on the linearized Navier–Stokes equations. The response of the forced flow to the low-frequency 3-D disturbances reveals that the time-periodic base flow is unstable with respect to a wide range of 3-D modes. In particular, the wavelength associated with the spanwise spacing of the K-mode falls into the range of, and is in fact very close to, the most unstable 3-D disturbances. Results from the secondary instability analysis and the comparison with DNS results, support the conjecture that the forcing amplitude has a major impact on the onset and amplification rate of the K-modes: lowering the forcing amplitude postpones the onset of the growth of the K-modes and reduces the growth rate of the K-modes for a given FST intensity. The net effect of these two events is a delay of the transition onset. Nevertheless, the instability mechanism that governs the transition process is the same as previously identified, i.e. interaction of the K-mode and 2-D primary wave. Furthermore, for low levels of FST, the amplitude of the low-frequency K-modes scales linearly with the FST intensity in the approach boundary layer up to the secondary instability regime.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Boundary layer separation Flow Control: Flow Control Instability: Transition to turbulence
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 850 , 10 September 2018 , pp. 954 - 983
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2018 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balzer, W. & Fasel, H. F. 2016 Numerical investigation of the role of free-stream turbulence in boundary-layer separation. J. Fluid Mech. 801, 289–321.Google Scholar
Benton, S. I. & Visbal, M. R. 2016 Investigation of high-frequency separation control mechanisms for delay of unsteady separation. In 8th AIAA Flow Control Conference, AIAA 2016-4241. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA).Google Scholar
Brandt, L., Henningson, D. S. & Ponziani, D. 2002 Weakly nonlinear analysis of boundary layer receptivity to free-stream disturbances. Phys. Fluids 14 (4), 1426–1441.Google Scholar
Brandt, L., Schlatter, P. & Henningson, D. S. 2004 Transition in boundary layers subject to free-stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 517, 167–198.Google Scholar
Diwan, S. S. & Ramesh, O. N. 2009 On the origin of the inflectional instability of a laminar separation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 629, 263–298.Google Scholar
Dong, M. & Wu, X. 2013 On continuous spectra of the Orr–Sommerfeld/Squire equations and entrainment of free-stream vortical disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 732, 616–659.Google Scholar
Embacher, M. & Fasel, H. F. 2014 Direct numerical simulations of laminar separation bubbles: investigation of absolute instability and active flow control of transition to turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 747, 141–185.Google Scholar
Fasel, H. F. 2002 Numerical investigation of the interaction of the Klebanoff-mode with a Tollmien–Schlichting wave. J. Fluid Mech. 450, 1–33.Google Scholar
Fransson, J. H., Brandt, L., Talamelli, A. & Cossu, C. 2005 Experimental study of the stabilization of Tollmien–Schlichting waves by finite amplitude streaks. Phys. Fluids 17 (5), 054110.Google Scholar
Gaster, M. 1967 The structure and behaviour of laminar separation bubbles. In ARC, Reports and Memoranda, No. 3595. Aeronautical Research Council.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. 2014 Effect of free-stream turbulence on boundary layer transition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 372 (2020), 1–18.Google Scholar
Grosch, C. E. & Salwen, H. 1978 The continuous spectrum of the Orr–Sommerfeld equation. Part 1. The spectrum and the eigenfunctions. J. Fluid Mech. 87 (1), 33–54.Google Scholar
Herbert, T. 1988 Secondary instability of boundary layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20 (1), 487–526.Google Scholar
Hosseinverdi, S., Balzer, W. & Fasel, H. F. 2012 Direct numerical simulations of the effect of free-stream turbulence on ‘long’ laminar separation bubbles. In 42th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, AIAA 2012-2972. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA).Google Scholar
Hosseinverdi, S. & Fasel, H. F. 2017 Numerical investigation of the interaction of active flow control and Klebanoff modes. In 47th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, AIAA 2017-4419. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA).Google Scholar
Huerre, P. & Monkewitz, P. A. 1990 Local and global instabilities in spatially developing flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 22 (1), 473–537.Google Scholar
Jacobs, R. G. & Durbin, P. A. 2001 Simulations of bypass transition. J. Fluid Mech. 428, 185–212.Google Scholar
Jones, L. E., Sandberg, R. D. & Sandham, N. D. 2008 Direct numerical simulations of forced and unforced separation bubbles on an airfoil at incidence. J. Fluid Mech. 602, 175–207.Google Scholar
Kendall, J. M. 1985 Experimental study of disturbances produced in a pretransitional laminar boundary layer by weak freestream turbulence. In 18th Fluid Dynamics and Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conference, AIAA 1985-1695. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA).Google Scholar
Kendall, J. M. 1990 Boundary layer receptivity to freestream turbulence. In 21st Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conference, AIAA 1990-1504. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA).Google Scholar
Klebanoff, P. S. 1971 Effect of free-stream turbulence on a laminar boundary layer. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 16 (11), 1323.Google Scholar
Landahl, M. T. 1975 Wave breakdown and turbulence. SIAM J. Appl. Maths 28 (4), 735–756.Google Scholar
Leib, S. J., Wundrow, D. W. & Goldstein, M. E. 1999 Effect of free-stream turbulence and other vortical disturbances on a laminar boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 380, 169–203.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Zaki, T. A. & Durbin, P. A. 2008a Boundary-layer transition by interaction of discrete and continuous modes. J. Fluid Mech. 604, 199–233.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Zaki, T. A. & Durbin, P. A. 2008b Floquet analysis of secondary instability of boundary layers distorted by Klebanoff streaks and Tollmien–Schlichting waves. Phys. Fluids 20 (12), 124102.Google Scholar
Lumley, J. L. 1967 The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows. Atmos. Turbul. Radio Wave Propag. 166–178.Google Scholar
Marxen, O. & Henningson, D. S. 2011 The effect of small-amplitude convective disturbances on the size and bursting of a laminar separation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 671, 1–33.Google Scholar
Marxen, O., Lang, M. & Rist, U. 2012 Discrete linear local eigenmodes in a separating laminar boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 711, 1–26.Google Scholar
Marxen, O., Lang, M., Rist, U. & Wagner, S. 2003 A combined experimental/numerical study of unsteady phenomena in a laminar separation bubble. Flow Turbul. Combust. 71 (1), 133–146.Google Scholar
Marxen, O. & Rist, U. 2010 Mean flow deformation in a laminar separation bubble: separation and stability characteristics. J. Fluid Mech. 660, 37–54.Google Scholar
Meitz, H. L. & Fasel, H. F. 2000 A compact-difference scheme for the Navier–Stokes equations in vorticity–velocity formulation. J. Comp. Phys. 157 (1), 371–403.Google Scholar
Morkovin, M. V., Reshotko, E. & Herbert, T. 1994 Transition in open flow systems: a reassessment. Bull. APS 39 (9), 1–31.Google Scholar
Postl, D., Balzer, W. & Fasel, H. F. 2011 Control of laminar separation using pulsed vortex generator jets: direct numerical simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 676, 81–109.Google Scholar
Rempfer, D. & Fasel, H. F. 1994 Evolution of three-dimensional coherent structures in a flat-plate boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 260, 351–375.Google Scholar
Ricco, P., Luo, J. & Wu, X. 2011 Evolution and instability of unsteady nonlinear streaks generated by free-stream vortical disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 677, 1–38.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, D., Gennaro, E. M. & Juniper, M. P. 2013 The two classes of primary modal instability in laminar separation bubbles. J. Fluid Mech. 734, R4-1–R4-11.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, D. & Theofilis, V. 2010 Structural changes of laminar separation bubbles induced by global linear instability. J. Fluid Mech. 655, 280–305.Google Scholar
Schrader, L. U., Amin, S. & Brandt, L. 2010 Transition to turbulence in the boundary layer over a smooth and rough swept plate exposed to free-stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 646, 297–325.Google Scholar
Schubauer, G. B. & Skramstad, H. K.1948 Laminar-boundary-layer oscillations and transition on a flat plate. NACA Tech. Rep. 909.Google Scholar
Sirovich, L. 1987 Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. coherent structures. Q. Appl. Maths 45 (3), 561–571.Google Scholar
Spalart, P. R. & Strelets, M. K. 2000 Mechanisms of transition and heat transfer in a separation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 403, 329–349.Google Scholar
von Terzi, D. A.2004 Numerical investigation of transitional and turbulent backward-facing step flows. PhD thesis, The University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Wu, X. & Dong, M. 2016 Entrainment of short-wavelength free-stream vortical disturbances in compressible and incompressible boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 797, 683–728.Google Scholar