Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T07:13:38.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of coherent structures in bubble transport by turbulent shear flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

K. J. Sene ,
J. C. R. Hunt  and
N. H. Thomas
K. J. Sene
Affiliation:
Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK
J. C. R. Hunt
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UKand Meteorological Office, Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 2SZ, UK
N. H. Thomas
Affiliation:
FAST Team, Chemical Engrg and FRED Ltd, Research Park, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using Auton's force law for the unsteady motion of a spherical bubble in inhomogeneous unsteady flow, two key dimensionless groups are deduced which determine whether isolated vortices or shear-layer vortices can trap bubbles. These groups represent the ratio of inertial to buoyancy forces as a relaxation parameter [tcy ] = ΔU2/2gx and a trapping parameter [Gcy ] = ΔU/VT where ΔU is the velocity difference across the vortex or the shear layer, x is streamwise distance measured from the effective origin of the mixing layer and VT is the terminal slip speed of the bubble or particle. It is shown here that whilst buoyancy and drag forces can lead to bubbles moving in closed orbits in the vortex flows (either free or forced), only inertial forces result in convergent trajectories. Bubbles converge on the downflow side of the vortex at a location that depends on the inertial and lift forces. It is important to note that the latter have been omitted from many earlier studies.

A discrete-vortex model is used to simulate the large-scale unsteady flows within horizontal and vertical mixing layers between streams with velocity difference ΔU. Trajectories of non-interacting small bubbles are computed using the general force law. In the horizontal mixing layer it is found that Γ needs to have a value of about 3 to trap about 50% of the bubbles if Π is about 0.5 and greater if Π is less. The pairing of vortices actually enhances their trapping of bubbles. In the vertical mixing layer bubbles are trapped mainly within the growing vortices but bubbles are concentrated on the downflow side of the vortices as Γ and Π increase. In a companion paper we show that lateral dispersion of bubbles can be approximately described by an advective diffusion equation with the diffusivity about equal to the eddy viscosity, i.e. rather less than the diffusivity of heat or other passive scalars.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 259 , 25 January 1994 , pp. 219 - 240
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashurst, W. T. 1977 Numerical simulations of turbulent mixing layers. In Turbulent Shear Flows 1, p. 402. Springer.
Ashurst, W. T. & Meiburg, E. 1988 Three-dimensional shear layers via vortex dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 189, 87.Google Scholar
Auton, T. R. 1983 The dynamics of bubbles, drops and particles in motion in liquids. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
Auton, T. R., Hunt, J. C. R. & Prud'homme, M. 1988 The force exerted on a body in inviscid unsteady nonuniform rotational flow. J. Fluid Mech. 197, 241.Google Scholar
Brown, G. L. & Roshko, A. 1974 On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 64, 775.Google Scholar
Chein, R. & Chung, J. N. 1987 Effects of vortex pairing on particle dispersion in turbulent shear flow. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 13, 785.Google Scholar
Chorin, A. J. 1973 Numerical study of slightly viscous flow. J. Fluid Mech. 57, 785.Google Scholar
Chung, J. N. & Troutt, T. R. 1988 Simulation of particle dispersion in an axisymmetric jet. J. Fluid Mech. 186, 199.Google Scholar
Clift, R., Grace, J. R. & Weber, M. E. 1978 Bubbles, Drops and Particles. Academic.
Fiedler, H. E. 1974 Transport of heat across a plane turbulent mixing layer. Adv. Geophys. 18A, 93.Google Scholar
Ghoniem, A. F., Chorin, A. J. & Oppenheim, A. K. 1981 Numerical modelling of turbulent combustion in premixed gases. In 18th Symp. on Combustion. The Combustion Institute.
Goldring, B. T., Mawer, W. T. & Thomas, N. H. 1980 Level surges in the circulating water downshaft of large generating stations. Proc. Third Intl Pressure Surges Conf., Coventry, UK. BHRA.
Hulin, J.-P., Fierfort, C. & Coudol, R. 1982 Experimental study of vortex emission behind bluff obstacles in a gas-liquid vertical two-phase flow. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 8, 475.Google Scholar
Hussain, A. K. M. F. 1983 Coherent structures – reality and myth. Phys. Fluids 26, 2816.Google Scholar
Kiya, M., Arie, M. & Harigane, K. 1980 Numerical simulation of gross structure in turbulent mixing layers by the discrete vortex model. Bull. JSME 23, 1959.Google Scholar
Leonard, A. 1980 Review of vortex dynamics for flow simulation. J. Comput. Phys. 37, 289.Google Scholar
Moore, D. W. 1981 On the point vortex method. SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 2, 65.Google Scholar
Nielsen, P. 1984 On the motion of suspended sand particles. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 616.Google Scholar
Peters, N. & Williams, F. A. 1980 Coherent structures in turbulent combustion. In Proc. Intl Conf. on The Role of Coherent Structures in Modelling Turbulence and Mixing, Madrid, Spain.
Sene, K. 1985 Aspects of bubbly two-phase flow. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
Sene, K., Thomas, N. H. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1993 Experimental study and diffusion modelling of bubbly mixing layers. Intl J. Multiphase Flow (to be submitted).Google Scholar
Shibiyama, T. & Horikawa, K. 1980 Laboratory study of sediment transport mechanism due to wave action. Proc. JSME 296, 131.Google Scholar
Soo, S. L. 1967 Fluid Dynamics of Multiphase Systems. Blaisdall.
Spalart, P. R. & Leonard, A. 1981 Computation of separated flows by a vortex tracing algorithm. AIAA 14th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conf., Palo Alto, California.
Thomas, N. H. 1982 Air demand distortion in hydraulic models. Proc. Intl Conf. on Hydraulic Modelling of Civil Engineering Structures, Coventry, UK. BHRA.
Thomas, N. H., Auton, T. R., Sene, K. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1983 Entrapment and transport of bubbles by transient large eddies in multiphase turbulent shear flows. In Proc. Intl Conf. on Physical Modelling of Multiphase Flows, Coventry, UK. BHRA.
Tooby, P. F., Wicks, G. L. & Isaacs, J. D. 1977 The motion of a small sphere in a rotating velocity field: a possible mechanism for suspending particles in turbulence. J. Geophys. Res. 82, 2096.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flows, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
Wallis, G. B. 1969 One-Dimensional Two-Phase Flow. McGraw-Hill.
Wood, D. H. & Bradshaw, P. 1982 A turbulent mixing layer constrained by a solid surface. Part 1. Measurements before reaching the surface. J. Fluid Mech. 122, 57.Google Scholar
Wygnanski, I. & Weisbrot, I. 1988 On the pairing process in an excited plane turbulent mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 161.Google Scholar