Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:45:09.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rising speed and dissolution rate of a carbon dioxide bubble in slightly contaminated water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 1999

F. TAKEMURA
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Laboratory, Agency of Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI), 1-2 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
A. YABE
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Laboratory, Agency of Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI), 1-2 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan

Abstract

The rising speed and dissolution rate of a carbon dioxide bubble in slightly contaminated water were investigated experimentally and numerically. We developed an experimental system that uses a charged-coupled device (CCD) camera coupled with a microscope to track the rising bubble. By precisely measuring the bubble size and rising speed, we were able to accurately estimate the drag coefficient and the Sherwood number for the dissolution rate of gas bubbles at Reynolds numbers below 100 in the transient regime, where the bubble changes from behaving as a fluid sphere to behaving as a solid particle. We also numerically estimated the drag coefficient and Sherwood number of the ‘stagnant cap model’ by directly solving the coupled Navier–Stokes and convection–diffusion equations. We compared our experimental results with our numerical results and proposed equations for estimating the drag coefficient and Sherwood number of the bubble affected by contamination and clarified that the gas–liquid interface of the carbon dioxide bubble in water is immobile. We also show that the experimental and numerical results are in good agreement and the stagnant cap model can explain the mechanism of the transient process where the bubble behaviour changes from that of a fluid sphere to that of a solid particle.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)