Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T01:00:12.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The response of sheared turbulence to additional distortion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2006

A. A. Townsend
Affiliation:
Emmanuel College, Cambridge

Abstract

In unidirectional flows, the ratios of Reynolds shear stress to total intensity (except near positions of zero stress) remain remarkably constant from one flow to another, but curvature or strong divergence of the mean flow causes very considerable changes in the stress ratios. A scheme for calculating the changes is described, based on the rapid-distortion approximation of the equations of motion. The results depend to some extent on the effective history of distortion of the turbulence and on the magnitude of an eddy viscosity that models the effect of nonlinear transfer of energy to smaller eddies of the dissipation sequence, but the correspondence with measured values in a distorted wake and in a curved mixing layer is fairly good. In particular, the curious behaviour of stress ratios in the curved mixing-layer can be reproduced qualitatively without any difficulty. Small perturbations of wall turbulence provide a simple application, and earlier calculations of the energy transfer between wind and water waves have been repeated including the changes in the stress ratios predicted by the scheme. In the latter case, very large changes in the distributions of pressure and shear stress are found, and the rates of energy transfer are much larger and in better agreement with observations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1980 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. & Proudman, I. 1954 Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 7, 83.
Bradshaw, P. 1969 J. Fluid Mech. 36, 177.
Castro, I. P. & Bradshaw, P. 1976 J. Fluid Mech. 73, 265.
Deissler, R. G. 1965 Phys. Fluids 8, 391.
Elliott, C. J. 1976 Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Gent, P. R. & Taylor, P. A. 1976 J. Fluid Mech. 77, 105.
Hunt, J. C. R. 1973 J. Fluid Mech. 61, 625.
Launder, B. E., Reece, G. J. & Rodi, W. 1975 J. Fluid Mech. 67, 569.
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1969 Phys. Fluids 12, 737.
Miles, J. W. 1957 J. Fluid Mech. 3, 185.
Moffatt, H. K. 1965 The interaction of turbulence with strong wind shear. In Proc. URSIIUGG Coll. on Atmos. Turbulence & Radio Wave Propag. Moscow: Nauka.
Pearson, J. R. A. 1959 J. Fluid Mech. 5, 274.
Savill, A. M. 1979 Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Townsend, A. A. 1970 J. Fluid Mech. 41, 13.
Townsend, A. A. 1972 J. Fluid Mech. 55, 719.
Townsend, A. A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.
Tucker, H. J. & Reynolds, A. J. 1968 J. Fluid Mech. 32, 657.