Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T22:14:01.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relaminarization in highly accelerated turbulent boundary layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

R. Narasimha  and
K. R. Sreenivasan
R. Narasimha
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
K. R. Sreenivasan
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The mean flow development in an initially turbulent boundary layer subjected to a large favourable pressure gradient beginning at a point x0 is examined through analyses expected a priori to be valid on either side of relaminarization. The ‘quasi-laminar’ flow in the later stages of reversion, where the Reynolds stresses have by definition no significant effect on the mean flow, is described by an asymptotic theory constructed for large values of a pressure-gradient parameter Λ, scaled on a characteristic Reynolds stress gradient. The limiting flow consists of an inner laminar boundary layer and a matching inviscid (but rotational) outer layer. There is consequently no entrainment to lowest order in Λ−1, and the boundary layer thins down to conserve outer vorticity. In fact, the predictions of the theory for the common measures of boundary-layer thickness are in excellent agreement with experimental results, almost all the way from x0. On the other hand the development of wall parameters like the skin friction suggests the presence of a short bubble-shaped reverse-transitional region on the wall, where neither turbulent nor quasi-laminar calculations are valid. The random velocity fluctuations inherited from the original turbulence decay with distance, in the inner layer, according to inverse-power laws characteristic of quasi-steady perturbations on a laminar flow. In the outer layer, there is evidence that the dominant physical mechanism is a rapid distortion of the turbulence, with viscous and inertia forces playing a secondary role. All the observations available suggest that final retransition to turbulence quickly follows the onset of instability in the inner layer.

It is concluded that reversion in highly accelerated flows is essentially due to domination of pressure forces over the slowly responding Reynolds stresses in an originally turbulent flow, accompanied by the generation of a new laminar boundary layer stabilized by the favourable pressure gradient.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , 20 November 1973 , pp. 417 - 447
Copyright
© 1973 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Back, L. H., Massier, P. F. & Gier, H. L. 1964 Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 7, 549.
Back, L. H. & Seban, R. A. 1967 Proc. Heat Trans. Fluid Mech. Inst. 20, 410.
Badri Narayanan, M. A. & Ramjee, V. 1969 J. Fluid Mech. 35, 225.
Batchelor, G. K. & Proudman, I. 1954 Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 7, 83.
Blackwelder, R. F. & Kovasznay, L. S. G. 1972 J. Fluid Mech. 53, 61.
Bradshaw, P. 1969 J. Fluid Mech. 35, 387.
Chen, K. K. & Libby, P. A. 1968 J. Fluid Mech. 33, 273.
Coles, D. 1953 Jet Propulsion Lab., Caltech. Rep. no. 20–69.
Curie, N. 1962 The Laminar Boundary Layer Equations. Oxford University Press.
Dhawan, S. & Narasimha, R. 1958 J. Fluid Mech. 3, 418.
Head, M. R. & Bradshaw, P. 1971 J. Fluid Mech. 46, 385.
Jones, W. P. & Launder, B. E. 1972 J. Fluid Mech. 56, 337.
Kline, S. J., Moffatt, H. K. & Morkovin, M. V. 1969 J. Fluid Mech. 36, 481.
Kline, S. J., Reynolds, W. C., Schraub, F. A. & Runstadler, P. W. 1967 J. Fluid Mech. 30, 741.
Launder, B. E. 1964 Gas Turbine Lab., M.I.T. Rep. no. 77.
Launder, B. E. & Stinchcombe, H. S. 1967 Mech. Engng Dept., Imperial College Rep. TWF/TN/21.
Lighthill, M. J. 1950 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 202, 359.
Moretti, P. H. & Kays, W. M. 1964 Thermosci. Mech. Engng Dept., Stanford University Rep. PG-1.
Moretti, P. H. & Kays, W. M. 1965 Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 8, 1187.
Narasimha, R. & Prabhu, A. 1972 J. Fluid Mech. 54, 1.
Patel, V. C. 1965 J. Fluid Mech. 23, 185.
Patel, V. C. & Head, M. R. 1968 J. Fluid Mech. 34, 371.
Ralston, A. & Wilf, H. S. (eds.) 1960 Mathematical Methods for Digital Computers. Wiley.
Ramjee, V. 1968 Ph.D. thesis, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science.
Rao, K. N., Narasimha, R. & Badri Narayanan, M. A. 1971 J. Fluid Mech. 48, 33.
Rosenhead, L. (ed.) 1963 Laminar Boundary Layers. Oxford University Press.
Schraub, F. A. & Kline, S. J. 1965 Thermosci. Div. Mech. Engng Dept., Stanford University Rep. MD-12.
Spence, D. 1956 J. Aero. Sci. 23, 3.
Sreenivasan, K. R. 1972a Dept. Aeron. Engng, Ind. Inst. Sci. Rep. 72 FM 2.
Sreenivasan, K. R. 1972b Dept. Aeron. Engng, Ind. Inst. Sci. Rep. 72 FM 7.
Sreenivasan, K. R. & Narasimha, R. 1971 Dept. Aeron. Engng, Ind. Inst. Sci. Rep. 71 FM 11.
Stratford, B. S. 1959 J. Fluid Mech. 5, 1.
Taylor, G. I. 1929 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 124, 243.
Thwaites, B. 1949 Aero. Quart. 1, 245.
Townsend, A. A. 1956 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.
Townsend, A. A. 1961 J. Fluid Mech. 11, 97.
Van Dyke, M. 1964 Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics. Academic.
Vivekanandan, R. 1963 M.Sc. thesis, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science.