Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-tx7qf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-08T07:52:58.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reflection of multiple incident shock waves and shock interaction train

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2025

Zhu-Di Li  and
Chen-Yuan Bai Open the ORCID record for Chen-Yuan Bai [Opens in a new window]
Zhu-Di Li
Affiliation:
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Fluid Mechanics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, PR China
Chen-Yuan Bai*
Affiliation:
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Fluid Mechanics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, PR China
*
Corresponding author: Chen-Yuan Bai, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The reflection of multiple incident shock waves that converge to a single point on the reflecting surface is studied in this paper. The number of the incident shocks, denoted $K$, is arbitrary. The interaction between the reflected shock of one incident shock and the other incident shocks may produce various possible configurations, such as type-I, type-II and type-IV shock interferences. The number of possible reflection configurations is shown to be an exponential function of ($K-1$) with base 2. The possibility of pre-, middle- and post-Mach reflections, which means Mach reflection occurs for the first, middle and last incident shock, is revealed through numerical simulation for $K=3$. For the particular case where the incident shocks are produced by equal variation of wedge surface deflection, the conventional von Neumann condition and detachment condition for the $k\mathrm{th}$ incident shock to have Mach reflection are derived. It is shown that the von Neumann condition for regular reflection is lowered and the detachment condition for Mach reflection is elevated as $k$ increases. The shock reflection patterns for $ K=1,2,\ldots ,10$ are obtained by numerical simulations. We observe a shock interaction train structure, where we have pre-Mach reflection followed by ($K-1$) type-I or type-II shock interferences. We also observe that the Mach stem height decreases with $K$ well above the von Neumann condition and becomes non-monotonic near the von Neumann condition.

JFM classification

Aerodynamics: High-speed flow Compressible Flows: Shock waves Compressible Flows: Supersonic flow
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 1008 , 10 April 2025 , A28
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azevedo, D.J. 1989 Analytical prediction of shock patterns in a high-speed wedge bounded duct. PhD thesis, Dept. Mech. & Aero. Engng, State University NY, Buffalo.Google Scholar
Azevedo, D.J. & Liu, C.S. 1993 Engineering approach to the prediction of shock patterns in bounded high-speed flows. AIAA J. 31 (1), 83–90.Google Scholar
Bai, C.Y. & Wu, Z.N. 2017 Size and shape of shock waves and slipline for Mach reflection in steady flow. J. Fluid Mech. 818, 116–140.Google Scholar
Bai, C.Y. 2024 Reflection of a centred compression wave. J. Fluid Mech. 984, A3.Google Scholar
Ben-Dor, G., Ivanov, M., Vasilev, E.I. & Elperin, T. 2002 Hysteresis processes in the regular reflection to Mach reflection transition in steady flows. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 38 (4-5), 347–387.Google Scholar
Ben-Dor, G. 2007 Shock Wave Reflection Phenomena. Springer.Google Scholar
Busemann, A. 1942 Die achsensymmetrische kegelige Uberschallstromung. Luftfahrtforschung 19, 137–144.Google Scholar
Chernyshov, M.V., Savelova, K.E. & Kapralova, A.S. 2021 Approximate analytical models of Shock-Wave structure at steady Mach reflection. Fluids 6 (9), 305.Google Scholar
Choe, S.G. 2022 A method for predicting Mach stem height in steady flows. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G. J. Aerosp. Engng 236 (1), 3–10.Google Scholar
Chpoun, A., Passerel, D., Li, H. & Ben-Dor, G. 1995 Reconsideration of oblique shock wave reflections in steady flows. Part 1. Experimental investigation. J. Fluid Mech. 301, 19–35.Google Scholar
Gao, B. & Wu, Z.N. 2010 A study of the flow structure for Mach reflection in steady supersonic flow. J. Fluid Mech. 656, 29–50.Google Scholar
Grasso, F. & Paoli, R. 1999 An analytical study of Mach reflection in nonequilibrium steady flows. Phys. Fluids 11 (10), 3150–3167.Google Scholar
Guan, X.K., Bai, C.Y. & Wu, Z.N. 2018 Steady Mach reflection with two incident shock waves. J. Fluid Mech. 855, 882–909.Google Scholar
Guan, X.-K., Bai, C.-Y. & Wu, Z.-N. 2020 Double solution and influence of secondary waves on transition criteria for shock interference in pre-Mach reflection with two incident shock waves. J. Fluid Mech. 887, A22.Google Scholar
Guan, X.K., Bai, C.Y., Lin, J. & Wu, Z.N. 2020 Mach reflection promoted by an upstream shock wave. J. Fluid Mech. 903, A44.Google Scholar
Hekiri, H. & Emanuel, G. 2015 Structure and morphology of a triple point. Phys. Fluids 27 (5), 056102.Google Scholar
Hornung, H.G., Oertel, H. & Sandeman, R.J. 1979 Transition to Mach reflection of shock waves in steady and pseudo-steady flows with and without relaxation. J. Fluid Mech. 90 (3), 541–560.Google Scholar
Hornung, H.G. & Robinson, M.L. 1982 Transition from regular to Mach reflection of shock waves Part 2. The steady-flow criterion. J. Fluid Mech. 123, 155–164.Google Scholar
Ivanov, M.S., Vandromme, D., Fomin, V.M., Kudryavtsev, A.N., Hadjadj, A. & Khotyanovsky, D.V. 2001 Transition between regular and Mach reflection of shock waves: new numerical and experimental results. Shock Waves 11 (3), 199–207.Google Scholar
Li, H. & Ben-Dor, G. 1997 A parametric study of Mach reflection in steady flows. J. Fluid Mech. 341, 101–125.Google Scholar
Li, H., Chpoun, A. & Ben-Dor, G. 1999 Analytical and experimental investigations of the reflection of asymmetric shock waves in steady flows. J. Fluid Mech. 390, 25–43.Google Scholar
Mach, E. 1878 Uber den verlauf von Funkenwellen in der Ebene und im Raume. Sitzungsbr Akad Wiss Wien. 78, 819–838.Google Scholar
Mouton, C.A. & Hornung, H.G. 2007 Mach stem height and growth rate predictions. AIAA J. 45, 1977–1987.Google Scholar
Ogawa, H., Moder, S., Timofeev, E.V. & Boyce, R.R. 2015 Startability and Mach Reflection Hysteresis of Shortened Busemann Intakes for Axisymmetric Scramjet Engines. In 29th International Symposium on Shock Waves 1, pp. 641–646. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roye, L., Henderson, F. & Menikoff, R. 1998 Triple-shock entropy theorem and its consequences. J. Fluid Mech. 366, 179–210.Google Scholar
Schotz, M., Levy, A., Ben-Dor, G. & Igra, O. 1997 Analytical prediction of the wave configuration size in steady flow Mach reflections. Shock Waves 7 (6), 363–372.Google Scholar
Shoesmith, B. & Timofeev, E. 2021 Modelling of Mach reflections in internal axisymmetric steady supersonic flow. Shock Waves 31 (8), 945–957.Google Scholar
Vinoth, P., Sushmitha, J. & Rajesh, G. 2022 Prediction of Mach stem height in compressible open jets. Part 1. Overexpanded jets. J. Fluid Mech. 942, A48.Google Scholar
Von Neumann, J. 1943 Oblique reflection of shock. Explos. Res. Rep. 12. Navy Department, Bureau of Ordinance.Google Scholar
Von Neumann, J. 1945 Refraction, intersection and reflection of shock waves. NAVORD Rep. 203-245. Navy Department, Bureau of Ordinance.Google Scholar
Vuillon, J., Zeiton, D. & Ben-Dor, G. 1995 Reconstruction of oblique shock wave reflection in steady flows. Part 2. Numerical investigation. J. Fluid Mech. 301, 37–50.Google Scholar