Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T19:08:23.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pulsatile entrance flow in a curved pipe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

L. Talbot
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley
K. O. Gong
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Present address: IBM Corp., Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A.

Abstract

An experimental investitition was made of the entry flow in a curved pipe under conditions wherein a pulsatile component of flow was superimposed on a steady mean flow. Two experiments were conducted, one in a pipe of curvature ratio $\delta = \frac{1}{20}$ under conditions of Womersley parameter αw = 8·0 and alternative Dean number κ = 120, the second in a pipe of $\delta = \frac{1}{7}$ for αw = 12·5 and κ = 372. Laser-velocimetry measurements of the axial and secondary velocities were made throughout the cross-section at different instants of time within the cycle and at several axial locations downstream from the pipe entrance.

The flow in the first experiment was found to be quasisteady, with axial and secondary velocities varying in time at the several axial stations proportionally to the instantaneous mean velocity, but essentially the same in character as low-Dean-number steady entry flow. The flow in the second experiment was more complex, with separation of the axial flow appearing at the inner bend during deceleration, starting downstream and propagating upstream toward the pipe entrance. Helical motions imbedded within the Dean circulation were also observed, and during certain portions of the cycle the secondary motions within the central core took on a jet-like structure.

It suggested that the classifications employed by Smith to describe the different regimes of fully-developed pulsatile flow in curved pipes may also be useful to distinguish between different entry-flow regimes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1983 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, M. 1934 Z. angew. Math. Mech. 14, 257.
Agrawal, Y. C., Talbot, L. & Gong, K. 1978 J. Fluid Mech. 85, 497.
Austin, L. 1971 The development of viscous flow within helical coils. Ph.D. thesis, University of Utah.
Chandran, K. B., Swanson, W. M. & Ghista, D. M. 1974 Ann. Biomed. Engng 2, 392.
Chandran, K. B. & Yearwood, T. L. 1981 J. Fluid Mech. 111, 59.
Chandran, K. B., Yearwood, T. L. & Weiting, D. W. 1979 J. Biomed. 12, 793.
Choi, U. S., Talbot, L. & Cornet, I. 1979 J. Fluid Mech. 93, 465.
Collins, W. M. & Dennis, S. C. R. 1975 Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 28, 133.
Dennis, S. C. R. 1980 J. Fluid Mech. 99, 449.
Dennis, S. C. R. & Ng, M. C. 1982 Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 35, 305.
Gong, K. O. 1979 Experimental study of unsteady entrance flow in a curved pipe. Univ. of Calif. Coll. Engng, Berkeley, Rep. FM-79-1.Google Scholar
Lyne, W. H. 1971 J. Fluid Mech. 45, 13.
Munson, B. R. 1975 Phys. Fluids 18, 1607.
Nandakumar, K. & Masliyah, J. H. 1982 J. Fluid Mech. 119, 475.
Nerem, R. M. & Cornhill, J. F. 1980 Trans. A.S.M.E. K: J. Biomech. Engng 102, 181.
Singh, M. P. 1974 J. Fluid Mech. 65, 517.
Singh, M. P., Sinha, P. C. & Aggarwal, M. 1978 J. Fluid Mech. 87, 97.
Smith, F. T. 1975 J. Fluid Mech. 71, 15.
Stewartson, K., Cebeci, T. & Chang, K. C. 1980 Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 33, 59.
Talbot, L. & Wong, S. J. 1982 J. Fluid Mech. 122, 505.
Tobak, M. & Peake, D. J. 1982 Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 14, 61.
Zalosh, R. & Nelson, W. G. 1973 J. Fluid Mech. 59, 693.