Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T04:55:50.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Properties of a bidisperse particle–gas suspension Part 2. Viscous relaxation time small compared with collision time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

V. Kumaran
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
Donald L. Koch
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

Abstract

The properties of a dilute bidisperse particle–gas suspension under low Reynolds number, high Stokes number conditions are studied in the limit τv [Lt ] τc, where τc is the time between successive collisions of a particle, and τv is the viscous relaxation time. In this limit, the particles relax close to their terminal velocity between successive collisions, and we use a perturbation analysis in the small parameter ε, which is proportional to τvc, about a base state in which all the particles settle at their terminal velocities. The mean velocities of the two species are O(ε) different from their terminal velocities, and the mean-square velocities are O(ε) smaller than the square of the terminal velocity. The distribution functions for the two species, which incorporate the first effects of collisions between particles settling at their terminal velocities, are derived. The velocity distribution is highly anisotropic in this limit, and the mean-square velocity in the vertical direction is twice that in the horizontal plane. The distribution function for each species is singular at its terminal velocity, and the distributions are non-zero in a finite region in velocity space between the two terminal velocities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. 1988 A new theory for the instability of a uniform fluidized bed. J. Fluid Mech. 193, 75110.Google Scholar
Didwania, A. K. & Homsy, G. M. 1982 Resonant sideband instabilities in wave propogation in fluidized beds. J. Fluid Mech. 122, 433438.Google Scholar
Koch, D. L. 1990 Kinetic theory for monodisperse gas–solid suspension. Phys. Fluids A 2, 17111723.Google Scholar
Koch, D. L. 1992 Anomalous diffusion of momentum in a dilute gas–solid suspension. Phys. Fluids A 4, 13371346.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. & Koch, D. L. 1993a Properties of a bidisperse particle–gas suspension. Part 1. Collision time small compared with viscous relaxation time. J. Fluid Mech. 247, 623641.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. & Koch, D. L. 1993b Approximate velocity distribution functions for a bidisperse particle–gas suspension. Intl J. Multiphase Flow (submitted.)Google Scholar
Lumley, J. L. 1978 Two phase and non Newtonian Flows. In Turbulence (ed. P. Bradshaw). Springer.