Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T18:02:46.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plane turbulent buoyant jets. Part 1. Integral properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2006

Nikolas E. Kotsovinos  and
E. J. List
Nikolas E. Kotsovinos
Affiliation:
W. M. Keck Laboratory of Hydraulics and Water Resources, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena Present address: School of Engineering, University of Patras, Greece.
E. J. List
Affiliation:
W. M. Keck Laboratory of Hydraulics and Water Resources, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An integral technique suggested for the analysis of turbulent jets by Corrsin & Uberoi (1950) and Morton, Taylor & Turner (1956) is re-examined in an attempt to improve the description of the entrainment. It is determined that the hypothesis of Priestley & Ball (1955), that the entrainment coefficient is a linear function of the jet Richardson number, is reasonable, and that two empirically determined plume parameters are sufficient to describe the transition of buoyant jets to plumes. The results of a series of experiments in which both time-averaged velocity and time-averaged temperature profiles were recorded in a substantial number of plane turbulent buoyant jets of varying initial Richardson numbers are used to verify the basic ideas. In addition, measurements of the mean tracer flux in a series of buoyant jets indicate that as much as 40% of the transport in plumes is by the turbulent flux.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 81 , Issue 1 , 9 June 1977 , pp. 25 - 44
Copyright
© 1977 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradbury, L. 1965 The structure of the self-preserving turbulent plane jet. J. Fluid Mech. 23, 31–64.Google Scholar
Brooks, N. H. & Koh, R. C. Y. 1965 Discharge of sewage effluent from a line source into a stratified ocean. 11th Cong. Int. Assoc. Hydraul. Res. paper 2.19.
Cormack, D. E. 1975 Studies of a phenomenological turbulence model. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.
Corrsin, S. & Uberoi, M. 1950 Further experiments on the flow and heat transfer in a heated turbulent air jet. N.A.C.A. Rep. no. 998.Google Scholar
Crow, S. C. & Champagne, F. H. 1971 Orderly structure in jet turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 48, 547–591.Google Scholar
Hegge Zijnen, B. G. Van Der 1958 Measurements of the distribution of heat and matter in a plane turbulent jet of air. Appl. Sci. Res. 7, 277–292.Google Scholar
Jenkins, P. E. & Goldschmidt, V. W. 1973 Mean temperature and velocity in a plane turbulent jet. Trans. A.S.M.E., J. Fluids Engng 95, 581–584.Google Scholar
Kotsovinos, N. E. 1975 A study of the entrainment and turbulence in a plane buoyant jet. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.
Lee, S. L. & Emmons, H. W. 1961 A study of natural convection above a line fire. J. Fluid Mech. 11, 353–368.Google Scholar
List, E. J. & Imberger, J. 1973 Turbulent entrainment in buoyant jets and plumes. J. Hydraul. Div., Proc. A.S.C.E. 99 (HY9), 1461–1474.Google Scholar
List, E. J. & Imberger, J. 1975 Closure of discussion to ‘Turbulent entrainment in buoyant jets and plumes’. J. Hydraul. Div., Proc. A.S.C.E. 101 (HY5), 617–620.Google Scholar
Lumley, J. L. & Khajeh-nouri, B. 1974 Computational modeling of turbulent transport. Adv. in Geophysics, 18A: 162–192.
Miller, D. R. & Comings, E. W. 1957 Static pressure distribution in the free turbulent jet. J. Fluid Mech. 3, 1–16.Google Scholar
Morton, B. R. 1959 Forced plumes. J. Fluid Mech. 5, 151–163.Google Scholar
Morton, B., Taylor, G. I. & Turner, J. S. 1956 Turbulent gravitational convection from maintained and instantaneous sources. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 234, 1–23.Google Scholar
Priestley, C. H. B. & Ball, F. K. 1955 Continuous convection from an isolated source of heat. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 81, 144–157.Google Scholar
Reichardt, H. 1942 Gesetzmassigkeiten der freien Turbulenz. VDI Forschungsheft 13, 1–22.Google Scholar
Rouse, H., Yih, C.-S. & Humphreys, H. W. 1952 Gravitational convection from a boundary source. Tellus, 4, 201–210.Google Scholar
Saffman, P. G. 1970 A model of inhomogeneous turbulent flow. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 317, 417–433.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H. 1960 Boundary Layer Theory, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill.
Stevenson, W. 1970 Optical frequency shifting by means of a rotating diffraction grating. Appl. Optics 9, 649–652.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. W. 1956 Irrotational motion associated with free turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 593–606.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1932 The transport of vorticity and heat through fluids in turbulent motion. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 135, 685–702.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1958 Flow induced by jets. J. Aero. Sci. 25, 464–465.Google Scholar
Tollmien, W. 1926 Die Berechnung turbelenter Ausbreitungsvorgange. Z. angew. Math. Mech. 6, 468–478.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1975 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.