Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:47:09.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Particle image velocimetry measurements of induced separation at the leading edge of a plate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

J. P. J. Stevenson ,
K. P. Nolan  and
E. J. Walsh
J. P. J. Stevenson
Affiliation:
Stokes Laboratories, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94 N5RH, Ireland
K. P. Nolan
Affiliation:
Thermal Management Research Group, Bell Labs Ireland, Alcatel-Lucent, Dublin, D15 Y6NT, Ireland
E. J. Walsh
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 0ES, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The free shear layer that separates from the leading edge of a round-nosed plate has been studied under conditions of low (background) and elevated (grid-generated) free stream turbulence (FST) using high-fidelity particle image velocimetry. Transition occurs after separation in each case, followed by reattachment to the flat surface of the plate downstream. A bubble of reverse flow is thereby formed. First, we find that, under elevated (7 %) FST, the time-mean bubble is almost threefold shorter due to an accelerated transition of the shear layer. Quadrant analysis of the Reynolds stresses reveals the presence of slender, highly coherent fluctuations amid the laminar part of the shear layer that are reminiscent of the boundary-layer streaks seen in bypass transition. Instability and the roll-up of vortices then follow near the crest of the shear layer. These vortices are also present under low FST and in both cases are found to make significant contributions to the production of Reynolds stress over the rear of the bubble. But their role in reattachment, whilst important, is not yet fully clear. Instantaneous flow fields from the low-FST case reveal that the bubble of reverse flow often breaks up into two or more parts, thereby complicating the overall reattachment process. We therefore suggest that the downstream end of the ‘separation isoline’ (the locus of zero absolute streamwise velocity that extends unbroken from the leading edge) be used to define the instantaneous reattachment point. A histogram of this point is found to be bimodal: the upstream peak coincides with the location of roll-up, whereas the downstream mode may suggest a ‘flapping’ motion.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Free shear layers Instability: Transition to turbulence Vortex Flows: Vortex shedding
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 804 , 10 October 2016 , pp. 278 - 297
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bearman, P. W. & Morel, T. 1983 Effect of free stream turbulence on the flow around bluff bodies. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 20 (2–3), 97–123.Google Scholar
Castro, I. P. 2005 The stability of laminar symmetric separated wakes. J. Fluid Mech. 532, 389–411.Google Scholar
Castro, I. P. & Epik, E. 1998 Boundary layer development after a separated region. J. Fluid Mech. 374, 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, I. P. & Haque, A. 1987 The structure of a turbulent shear layer bounding a separation region. J. Fluid Mech. 179, 439–468.Google Scholar
Castro, I. P. & Haque, A. 1988 The structure of a shear layer bounding a separation region. Part 2. Effects of free-stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 192, 577–595.Google Scholar
Chandrsuda, C. & Bradshaw, P. 1981 Turbulence structure of a reattaching mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 110, 171–194.Google Scholar
Charonko, J. J. & Vlachos, P. P. 2013 Estimation of uncertainty bounds for individual particle image velocimetry measurements from cross-correlation peak ratio. Meas. Sci. Technol. 24 (6), 065301.Google Scholar
Cherry, N. J., Hillier, R. & Latour, M. E. M. P. 1984 Unsteady measurements in a separated and reattaching flow. J. Fluid Mech. 144, 13–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djilali, N. & Gartshore, I. S. 1991 Turbulent flow around a bluff rectangular plate. Part I: Experimental investigation. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Engng 113 (1), 51–59.Google Scholar
Dryden, H. L. 1943 A review of the statistical theory of turbulence. In Turbulence: Classical Papers on Statistical Theory (ed. Friedlander, S. K. & Topper, L.), pp. 115–132. Interscience.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. K. & Johnston, J. P. 1982 Low frequency unsteadiness of a reattaching turbulent shear layer. In Turbulent Shear Flows 3, pp. 162–170. Springer.Google Scholar
Fransson, J. H. M., Matsubara, M. & Alfredsson, P. H. 2005 Transition induced by free-stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 527, 1–25.Google Scholar
Hernon, D., Walsh, E. J. & McEligot, D. M. 2007 Experimental investigation into the routes to bypass transition and the shear-sheltering phenomenon. J. Fluid Mech. 591, 461–479.Google Scholar
Hillier, R. & Cherry, N. J. 1981 The effects of stream turbulence on separation bubbles. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn. 8 (1–2), 49–58.Google Scholar
Hudy, L. M., Naguib, A. M. & Humphreys, W. M. Jr 2003 Wall-pressure-array measurements beneath a separating/reattaching flow region. Phys. Fluids 15 (3), 706–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R. & Durbin, P. A. 1999 Perturbed vortical layers and shear sheltering. Fluid Dyn. Res. 24 (6), 375–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, K. S., Sung, H. J. & Hyun, J. M. 2000 Visualizations of large-scale vortices in flow about a blunt-faced flat plate. Exp. Fluids 29 (2), 198–201.Google Scholar
Kalter, M. & Fernholz, H. H. 2001 The reduction and elimination of a closed separation region by free-stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 446, 271–308.Google Scholar
Kanevče, G. & Oka, S. 1973 Correcting hot-wire readings for influence of fluid temperature variations. In DISA Information, 15, pp. 21–24. DISA.Google Scholar
Kiya, M. & Sasaki, K. 1983 Structure of a turbulent separation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 137, 83–113.Google Scholar
Kiya, M. & Sasaki, K. 1985 Structure of large-scale vortices and unsteady reverse flow in the reattaching zone of a turbulent separation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 154, 463–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurian, T. & Fransson, J. H. M. 2009 Grid-generated turbulence revisited. Fluid Dyn. Res. 41 (2), 021403.Google Scholar
Lamballais, E., Silvestrini, J. & Laizet, S. 2010 Direct numerical simulation of flow separation behind a rounded leading edge: study of curvature effects. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 31 (3), 295–306.Google Scholar
Lane, J. C. & Loehrke, R. I. 1980 Leading edge separation from a blunt plate at low Reynolds number. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Engng 102 (4), 494–496.Google Scholar
Langari, M. & Yang, Z. 2013 Numerical study of the primary instability in a separated boundary layer transition under elevated free-stream turbulence. Phys. Fluids 25 (7), 074106.Google Scholar
Li, X. & Djilali, N. 1995 On the scaling of separation bubbles. JSME Intl J. B 38 (4), 541–548.Google Scholar
Lumley, J. L. 1970 Stochastic Tools in Turbulence. Dover.Google Scholar
Nolan, K. P. & Walsh, E. J. 2012 Particle image velocimetry measurements of a transitional boundary layer under free stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 702, 215–238.Google Scholar
O’Neill, P. L., Nicolaides, D., Honnery, D. & Soria, J. 2004 Autocorrelation functions and the determination of integral length with reference to experimental and numerical data. In 15th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, pp. 13–17. The University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Ota, T., Asano, Y. & Okawa, J. 1981 Reattachment length and transition of the separated flow over blunt flat plates. Bull. JSME 24 (192), 941–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, P. E. 1987 The generation of nearly isotropic turbulence by means of grids. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 8 (2), 82–92.Google Scholar
Roach, P. & Brierley, D. H. 1992 The influence of a turbulent free-stream on zero pressure gradient transitional boundary layer development. Part I: Test cases T3A and T3B. In Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Flows and Transition to Turbulence, pp. 319–347. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruderich, R. & Fernholz, H. H. 1986 Experimental investigation of a turbulent shear flow with separation, reverse flow, and reattachment. J. Fluid Mech. 163, 283–322.Google Scholar
Sasaki, K. & Kiya, M. 1985 Effect of free-stream turbulence on turbulent properties of a separation–reattachment flow. Bull. JSME 28 (238), 610–616.Google Scholar
Sasaki, K. & Kiya, M. 1991 Three-dimensional vortex structure in a leading-edge separation bubble at moderate Reynolds numbers. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Engng 113 (3), 405–410.Google Scholar
Scarano, F. 2002 Iterative image deformation methods in PIV. Meas. Sci. Technol. 13 (1), R1–R19.Google Scholar
Stevenson, J. P. J., Walsh, E. J., Nolan, K. P. & Davies, M. R. D. 2014 Separation and free-stream turbulence: implications for surface aerodynamics and heat transfer. J. Phys. 525 (1), 012018.Google Scholar
Tafti, D. K. & Vanka, S. P. 1991 A numerical study of flow separation and reattachment on a blunt plate. Phys. Fluids A 3 (7), 1749–1759.Google Scholar
Tani, I. 1964 Low-speed flows involving bubble separations. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 5, 70–103.Google Scholar
Taniguchi, H., Sakai, H. & Funazaki, K. 2012 Effects of freestream turbulence on bypass transition of separated boundary layer on low-pressure turbine airfoils. J. Therm. Sci. 21 (3), 230–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Z. & Abdalla, A. E. 2009 Effects of free-stream turbulence on a transitional separated–reattached flow over a flat plate with a sharp leading edge. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 30 (5), 1026–1035.Google Scholar
Yang, Z. & Abdalla, I. E. 2005 Effects of free-stream turbulence on large-scale coherent structures of separated boundary layer transition. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 49 (3), 331–348.Google Scholar
Yang, Z. & Abdalla, I. E. 2008 On coherent structures in a separated/reattached flow. WSEAS Trans. Fluid Mech. 3, 143–153.Google Scholar
Yang, Z. & Voke, P. R. 2001 Large-eddy simulation of boundary-layer separation and transition at a change of surface curvature. J. Fluid Mech. 439, 305–333.Google Scholar