Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T08:17:46.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parametrically excited, standing cross-waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

John Miles
John Miles
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Luke's (1967) variational formulation for surface waves is extended to incorporate the motion of a wavemaker and applied to the cross-wave problem. Whitham's average-Lagrangian method then is invoked to obtain the evolution equations for the slowly varying complex amplitude of the parametrically excited cross-wave that is associated with symmetric excitation of standing waves in a rectangular tank of width π/k, length l and depth d for which kl = O(1) and kd [Gt ] 1. These evolution equations are Hamiltonian and isomorphic to those for parametric excitation of surface waves in a cylinder that is subjected to a vertical oscillation, for which phase-plane trajectories, stability criteria and the effects of damping are known (Miles 1984a). The formulation and results differ from those of Garrett (1970) in consequence of his linearization of the boundary condition at the wavemaker and his neglect of self-interaction of the cross-waves in the free-surface conditions (although Garrett does incorporate self-interaction in his calculation of the equilibrium amplitude of the cross-waves). These differences have only a small effect on the criterion for the stability of plane waves, but the self-interaction is crucial for the determination of the stability of the cross-waves.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 186 , January 1988 , pp. 119 - 127
Copyright
© 1988 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnard, B. J. S. & Pritchard, W. C. 1972 Cross-waves. Part 2. Experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 55, 245–255.Google Scholar
Garrett, C. J. R. 1970 On cross-waves. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 837–849.Google Scholar
Havelock, T. H. 1929 Forced surface waves on water. Phil. Mag. 8 (7), 569–576.Google Scholar
Jones, A. F. 1984 The generation of cross-waves in a long deep tank by parametric resonance. J. Fluid Mech. 138, 53–74.Google Scholar
Larraza, A. & Putterman, S. 1984 Theory of non-propagating surface-wave solitons. J. Fluid Mech. 148, 443–449.Google Scholar
Lin, J. D. & Howard, L. N. 1960 Non-linear standing waves in a rectangular tank due to forced oscillation. M.I.T. Hydrodynamics Laboratory Rep. 44.
Luke, J. C. 1967 A variational principle for a fluid with a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 27, 395–397.Google Scholar
Mahony, J. J. 1972 Cross-waves. Part 1. Theory. J. Fluid Mech. 55, 229–244.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1984a Nonlinear Faraday resonance. J. Fluid Mech. 146, 285–302; Corrigenda. J. Fluid Mech. 154 (1985), 535.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1984b Parametrically excited solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 148, 451–460; Corrigenda. J. Fluid Mech. 154 (1985), 535.Google Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord 1915 Deep water waves, progressive or stationary, to the third order of approximation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 91, 345–353; also Scientific Papers, vol. 6, pp. 306–314. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitham, G. B. 1974 Linear and Nonlinear Waves, §13.2. Wiley-Interscience.
Wu, J., Keolian, R. & Rudnick, I. 1984 Observation of a non-propagating hydrodynamic soliton. Phys. Rev. Lett 52, 1421–1424.Google Scholar