Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:49:33.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A parametric study of breaking bow waves using a 2D + T Technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

Eric Maxeiner ,
Mostafa Shakeri  and
James H. Duncan
Eric Maxeiner*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
Mostafa Shakeri
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
James H. Duncan
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A mechanical two-dimensional wave maker with a flexible surface was used to create waves similar to those formed at the bow of a moving ship. Utilizing the two-dimensional plus time (2D + T) approximation, the wave maker was programmed so that its deformable wave board created a time sequence of shapes that simulated the line of intersection between one side of the hull of a slender ship model moving at constant speed and an imaginary vertical plane oriented normal to the ship model track. However, instead of simulating a particular ship hull, the wave maker was set to produce a parametric set of flat plate motions that represent components of typical bow shapes. The resulting surface waves were measured using a cinematic laser-induced fluorescence technique and the resulting wave profiles were analysed. A large variation of wave crest shapes was observed. An assortment of wave characteristics including the maximum contact point height, maximum wave height and plunging jet geometry were measured and related to the corresponding wave maker motion parameters. Despite the variety of wave maker motions and resulting wave crest shapes, it was observed that the gross parameters describing the wave, such as the maximum wave height, maximum contact point height and wave phase speed, correlate strongly with the wave maker velocity along the water line. Details of the crest shape at the moment of incipient breaking showed a stronger dependence on the initial acceleration of the wave board.

JFM classification

Waves/Free-surface Flows: Surface gravity waves Waves/Free-surface Flows: Wave breaking
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 687 , 25 November 2011 , pp. 540 - 570
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Present address: Naval Research Laboratory, Coastal and Ocean Remote Sensing Branch, Washington, DC 20375, USA

§

Present address: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA

References

1. Aoki, K., Masuko, A., Miyata, H. & Kajitani, H. 1982 A numercial analysis of nonlinear waves generated by ships of arbitrary waterline. J. Soc. Nav. Archit. Japan 154, 17–28.Google Scholar
2. Banner, M. L. & Peregrine, D. H. 1993 Wave breaking in deep-water. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 25, 373–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Brocchini, M. & Peregrine, D. H. 2001 The dynamics of strong turbulence at free surfaces. Part 1. Description. J. Fluid Mech. 449, 225–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Calisal, S. M. & Chan, J. L. K. 1989 A numerical modelling of ship bow waves. J. Ship Res. 33, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Chapman, R. B. 1976 Free-surface effects for yawed surface-piercing plates. J. Ship Res. 20 (3), 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Colagrossi, A., Landrini, M. & Tulin, M. P. 2001 Numerical studies of breaking bow waves compared to experimental observations, In Proceedings of the 4th Numerical Towing Tank Symposium., Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
7. Delhommeau, G., Guilbaud, M., L David, C. Yang & Noblesse, F. 2009 Boundary between unsteady and overturning ship bow wave regimes. J. Fluid Mech. 620, 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Dommermuth, D. G., O’Shea, T. T., Wyatt, D. C., Sussman, M., Weymouth, G. D., Yue, D. K. P., Adam, P. & Hand, R. 2006 The numerical simulation o ship waves using Cartesian-grid and volume-of-fluid methods, 26th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Rome, Italy, 17–22 September.Google Scholar
9. Dong, R. R., Katz, J. & Huang, T. T. 1997 On the structure of bow waves on a ship model. J. Fluid Mech. 346, 77–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Duncan, J. H. 2001 Spilling breakers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 33, 519–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Fontaine, E., Faltinsen, O. M. & Cointe, R. 2000 New insight into the generation of ship bow waves. J. Fluid Mech. 421, 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Inui, T. 1981 From bulbous bow to free-surface shock wave – trends of 20 years’ research on ship waves at the Tokyo University Tank. J. Ship Res. 25 (3), 147–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Landrini, M., Colagrossi, A. & Tulin, M. P. 2001Breaking bow and stern waves: numerical simulations, In Proceedings 16th International Workshop on Water Waves Floating Bodies, Hiroshima, Japan.Google Scholar
14. Melville, W. K. 1996 The role of surface-wave breaking in air–sea interaction. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 28, 279–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Miyata, H. 1980 Characteristics of nonlinear waves in the near-field of ships and their effects on resistance. In Thirteenth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics. National Academy Press.Google Scholar
16. Miyata, H. & Inui, T. 1984 Nonlinear ship waves. In Adv. Appl. Mech., 24. pp. 215–288.Google Scholar
17. Noblesse, F., Hendrix, D., Faul, L. & Slutsky, J. 2006 Simple analytical expressions for the height, location and steepness of a ship bow wave. J. Ship Res. 50 (4), 360–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Noblesse, F., Delhommeau, G., Guilbaud, M., Hendrix, D. & Yang, C. 2008a Simple analytical relations for ship bow waves. J. Fluid Mech. 600, 105–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Noblesse, F., Delhommeau, G., Guilbaud, M. & Yang, C. 2008b Rise of water at a ship stem. J. Ship Res. 52 (2), 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Noblesse, F., Delhommeau, G., Kim, H. Y. & Yang, C. 2009 Thin-ship theory and influence of rake and flare. J. Engng Maths 64 (1), 49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Noblesse, F., Delhommeau, G., Yang, C., Kim, H. Y. & Queutey, P. 2011 Analytical bow waves for fine ship bows with rake and flare. J. Ship Res. 55 (1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Ogilvie, T. F. 1972 The wave generated by a fine ship bow. In Proceedings 9th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, vol. 2, pp. 1483–1525. National Academy.Google Scholar
23. Olivieri, A., Pistani, F., Wilson, R., Campana, E. F. & Stern, F. 2007 Scars and vortices induced by ship bow and shoulder wave breaking. J. Fluids Engng 129 (11), 1445–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Peltzer, R. 1984 White-water wake characteristics of surface vessels. NRL Memorandum Report 5335. Naval Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
25. Pogozelski, M., Katz, J. & Huang, T. T. 1997 The flow structure around a surface piercing strut. Phys. Fluids 9, 1387–1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Roberts, A. J. 1987 Transient free-surface flows generated by a moving vertical plate. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 40 (1), 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Roth, G. L., Mascenik, D. T. & Katz, J. 1999 Measurements of the flow structure and turbulence within a ship bow wave. Phys. Fluids 11 (11), 3512–3523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Shakeri, M., Tavakolinejad, M. & Duncan, J. H. 2009a An experimental investigation of divergent bow waves simulated by a two-dimensional plus temporal wave maker technique. J. Fluid Mech. 634, 217–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Shakeri, M., Maxeiner, E., Fu, T. & Duncan, J. H. 2009b An experimental examination of the approximation. J. Ship Res. 53 (2), 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Song, W. & Maruo, H. 1993 Bow impact and deck wetness: simulations based on nonlinear slender body theory. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 3. pp. 34–38. International Society of Offshore & Polar Engineers.Google Scholar
31. Standing, R. G. 1974 Phase and amplitude discrepancies in the surface wave due to a wedge-ended hull form. J. Fluid Mech. 62, 625–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Tulin, M. P. 1957 Theory of slender surfaces planing at high speeds. Schiffstechnik 4 (21), 125–133.Google Scholar
33. Tulin, M. P. & Hsu, C. C. 1986 Theory of high speed displacement ships with transom sterns. J. Ship Res. 30 (3), 186–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Tulin, M. & Wu, M. 1996 Divergent bow waves. In Proceedings of the 21st Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, pp. 661–679. National Academy Press.Google Scholar
35. Tulin, M. P. & Landrini, M. 2000 Breaking waves in the ocean and around ships. In Proceedings of the 23rd ONR Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Val de Reuil, France, vol. 4, National Academy, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
36. Waniewski, T., Brennan, C. & Raichlen, F. 2001 Measurements of air entrainment by bow waves. J. Fluids Engng 123, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Waniewski, T., Brennan, C. & Raichlen, F. 2002 Bow wave dynamics. J. Ship Res. 46 (1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar