Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:34:15.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimal heat flux for delaying transition to turbulence in a high-speed boundary layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2021

Reza Jahanbakhshi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD21218, USA
Tamer A. Zaki*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD21218, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

The optimal steady wall heat flux is sought to delay transition to turbulence in a Mach 4.5 boundary layer, when the free stream disturbance is the nonlinearly most dangerous condition that causes the earliest breakdown to turbulence in the adiabatic flow. The transition-delay strategy is pursued using direct numerical simulations, and the problem is formulated as a constrained optimization where the objective is to minimize the viscous drag force and the control vector is the heat flux at the wall. The optimization is performed using an ensemble-variational approach. The algorithm identifies regions of the flow that are most sensitive to thermal treatment: most of the heating and cooling is applied upstream of the synchronization point of the slow and the fast modes. Attenuation of key instability waves by the optimal heat flux mitigates the nonlinear interactions that preceded breakdown to turbulence in the reference flow, and hence transition is appreciably delayed. Detailed analysis of the acoustic, entropic and solenoidal components of the momentum density vector reveals the stabilizing effects of the optimal heat flux. In addition, the influence of the thermal treatment is not limited to the pretransitional flow where it is concentrated, but rather it persists downstream even within the newly formed fully turbulent boundary layer.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: Department of Aerospace, Physics and Space Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA.

References

REFERENCES

Bertolotti, F.P., Herbert, T. & Spalart, P.R. 1992 Linear and nonlinear stability of the Blasius boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 242, 441474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitter, N.P. & Shepherd, J.E. 2015 Stability of highly cooled hypervelocity boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 778, 586620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bountin, D., Maslov, A. & Gromyko, Y. 2018 Analysis of disturbances in a hypersonic boundary layer on a cone with heating/cooling of the nose tip. Phys. Fluids 30 (5), 054103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candler, G.V. 2019 Rate effects in hypersonic flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51, 379402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chien, K.-Y. 1973 Hypersonic, turbulent, cold-wall, skin-friction and heat-transfer measurements on an axisymmetric sharp cone. Tech. Rep.. AD 764 059. Naval Ordnance Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCarlo, J.P., Sanator, R.J. & Torrillo, D.T. 1965 Hypersonic boundary-layer transition data for a cold-wall slender cone. AIAA J. 3 (4), 758760.Google Scholar
Deem, R. & Murphy, J. 1965 Flat plate boundary layer transition at hypersonic speeds. In 2nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 65-128.Google Scholar
Demetriades, A. 1978 New experiments on hypersonic boundary layer stability including wall temperature effects. In Proceedings of 26th Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute, Pullman, Washington, pp. 39–55. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Doak, P.E. 1989 Momentum potential theory of energy flux carried by momentum fluctuations. J. Sound Vib. 131 (1), 6790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, L., Beekman, I. & Martin, M.P. 2010 Direct numerical simulation of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. Part 2. Effect of wall temperature. J. Fluid Mech. 655, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducros, F., Laporte, F., Soulères, T., Guinot, V., Moinat, P. & Caruelle, B. 2000 High-order fluxes for conservative skew-symmetric-like schemes in structured meshes: application to compressible flows. J. Comput. Phys. 161 (1), 114139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedorov, A. 2011 Transition and stability of high-speed boundary layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 7995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedorov, A., Soudakov, V., Egorov, I., Sidorenko, A., Gromyko, Y., Bountin, D., Polivanov, P. & Maslov, A. 2015 High-speed boundary-layer stability on a cone with localized wall heating or cooling. AIAA J. 53 (9), 25122524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedorov, A. & Tumin, A. 2011 High-speed boundary-layer instability: old terminology and a new framework. AIAA J. 49 (8), 16471657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fong, K.D., Wang, X., Huang, Y., Zhong, X., McKiernan, G.R., Fisher, R.A. & Schneider, S.P. 2015 Second mode suppression in hypersonic boundary layer by roughness: design and experiments. AIAA J. 53 (10), 31383144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franko, K.J. & Lele, S.K. 2013 Breakdown mechanisms and heat transfer overshoot in hypersonic zero pressure gradient boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 730, 491532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasperas, G. 1989 Effect of wall temperature distribution on the stability of the compressible boundary layer. In 20th Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conference, AIAA Paper 89-1894.Google Scholar
Haack, A., Gerding, M. & Lübken, F.-J. 2014 Characteristics of stratospheric turbulent layers measured by LITOS and their relation to the Richardson number. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 119 (18), 1060510618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, W.D. 1978 Influence of free-stream disturbances on boundary-layer transition. NASA Technical Memorandum 78635.Google Scholar
Herbert, T. 1988 Secondary instability of boundary layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20 (1), 487526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, T. 1997 Parabolized stability equations. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 29 (1), 245283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahanbakhshi, R. & Zaki, T.A. 2019 Nonlinearly most dangerous disturbance for high-speed boundary-layer transition. J. Fluid Mech. 876, 87121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnsen, E., et al. 2010 Assessment of high-resolution methods for numerical simulations of compressible turbulence with shock waves. J. Comput. Phys. 229 (4), 12131237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawai, S. & Larsson, J. 2012 Wall-modeling in large eddy simulation: length scales, grid resolution, and accuracy. Phys. Fluids 24 (1), 015105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogmann, P. 1977 An experimental study of boundary-layer transition on a slender cone at Mach 5. In Symposium on laminar–turbulent transition, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, AGARD-CP-224, p. 26:1–12.Google Scholar
Larsson, J. & Lele, S.K. 2009 Direct numerical simulation of canonical shock/turbulence interaction. Phys. Fluids 21 (12), 126101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leyva, I.A. 2017 The relentless pursuit of hypersonic flight. Phys. Today 70 (11), 3036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leyva, I., Laurence, S., Beierholm, A., Hornung, H., Wagnild, R. & Candler, G. 2009 Transition delay in hypervelocity boundary layers by means of co2/acoustic instability interactions. In 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, AIAA Paper 2009-1287.Google Scholar
Lysenko, V.I. & Maslov, A. 1981 Transition reversal and one of its causes. AIAA J. 19 (6), 705708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lysenko, V.I. & Maslov, A.A. 1984 The effect of cooling on supersonic boundary-layer stability. J. Fluid Mech. 147, 3952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, L.M. 1969 Boundary layer stability theory. Tech. Rep. 900-277. Jet Propulsion Laboratory.Google Scholar
Mack, L.M. 1975 Linear stability theory and the problem of supersonic boundary-layer transition. AIAA J. 13 (3), 278289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, L.M. 1984 Boundary-layer linear stability theory. Tech. Rep. California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory.Google Scholar
Malik, M.R. 1989 Prediction and control of transition in supersonic and hypersonic boundary layers. AIAA J. 27 (11), 14871493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marxen, O. & Zaki, T.A. 2019 Turbulence in intermittent transitional boundary layers and in turbulence spots. J. Fluid Mech. 860, 350383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masad, J.A., Nayfeh, A.H. & Al-Maaitah, A.A. 1992 Effect of heat transfer on the stability of compressible boundary layers. Comput. Fluids 21 (1), 4361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mons, V., Chassaing, J.-C., Gomez, T. & Sagaut, P. 2016 Reconstruction of unsteady viscous flows using data assimilation schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 316, 255280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mons, V., Wang, Q. & Zaki, T.A. 2019 Kriging-enhanced ensemble variational data assimilation for scalar-source identification in turbulent environments. J. Comput. Phys. 398, 108856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morkovin, M.V. 1987 Transition at hypersonic speeds. NASA Contractor Report No. NAS1-18107.Google Scholar
Nocedal, J. & Wright, S. 2006 Numerical Optimization. Springer.Google Scholar
Paredes, P., Choudhari, M.M. & Li, F. 2018 Transition delay via vortex generators in a hypersonic boundary layer at flight conditions. In Fluid Dynamics Conference, AIAA Paper 2018-3217.Google Scholar
Park, J. & Zaki, T.A. 2019 Sensitivity of high-speed boundary-layer stability to base-flow distortion. J. Fluid Mech. 859, 476515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, J.L. 1980 Review of the influence of cooled walls on boundary-layer transition. AIAA J. 18 (8), 10101012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanator, R.J., DeCarlo, J.P. & Torrillo, D.T. 1965 Hypersonic boundary-layer transition data for a cold-wall slender cone. AIAA J. 3 (4), 758760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, S.P. 1999 Flight data for boundary-layer transition at hypersonic and supersonic speeds. J. Spacecr. Rockets 36 (1), 820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadloo, M.S. & Hadjadj, A. 2017 Laminar-turbulent transition in supersonic boundary layers with surface heat transfer: a numerical study. Numer. Heat Transfer, A: Appl. 72 (1), 4053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S.K., Shadloo, M.S. & Hadjadj, A. 2018 Laminar-to-turbulent transition in supersonic boundary layer: effects of initial perturbation and wall heat transfer. Numer. Heat Transfer, A: Appl. 73 (9), 583603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetson, K. & Kimmel, R. 1992 On hypersonic boundary-layer stability. In 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, p. 737. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, W. 1893 LII. The viscosity of gases and molecular force. Lond. Edinb. Dubl. Phil. Mag. J. Sci. 36 (223), 507531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unnikrishnan, S. & Gaitonde, D.V. 2019 Interactions between vortical, acoustic and thermal components during hypersonic transition. J. Fluid Mech. 868, 611647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volpiani, P.S., Bernardini, M. & Larsson, J. 2018 Effects of a nonadiabatic wall on supersonic shock/boundary-layer interactions. Phys. Rev. Fluids 3 (8), 083401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, J.E. 1967 Hypersonic turbulent boundary layer studies at cold wall conditions. In Proceedings of 1967 Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute, pp. 427–451. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wazzan, A.R. & Taghavi, H. 1982 The effect of heat transfer on three-dimensional spatial stability and transition of flat plate boundary layer at Mach 3. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 25 (9), 13211331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, F.M. 2006 Viscous Fluid Flow, vol. 3. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Xiao, D. & Papadakis, G. 2019 Nonlinear optimal control of transition due to a pair of vortical perturbations using a receding horizon approach. J. Fluid Mech. 861, 524555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, R., Wen, C.Y., Tian, X.D., Long, T.H. & Yuan, W. 2018 Numerical simulation of local wall heating and cooling effect on the stability of a hypersonic boundary layer. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 121, 986998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuccher, S., Luchini, P. & Bottaro, A. 2004 Algebraic growth in a Blasius boundary layer: optimal and robust control by mean suction in the nonlinear regime. J. Fluid Mech. 513, 135160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar