Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:22:11.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the reattachment of a shock layer produced by an instantaneous energy release

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

H. K. Cheng
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
J. W. Kirsch
Affiliation:
Science, System & Software, La Jolla, California
R. S. Lee
Affiliation:
McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Company – Western Division, Huntington Beach, California

Abstract

The behaviour of a strong shock wave, which is initiated by a point explosion and driven continuously outward by an inner contact surface (or a piston), is studied as a problem of multiple time scales for an infinite shock strength, $\dot{y}_{sh}/a_{\infty}\rightarrow \infty $, and a high shock-compression ratio, ρs ∼ 2γ/(γ − 1) ≡ ε−1 [Gt ] 1. The asymptotic analyses are carried out for cases with planar and cylindrical symmetry in which the piston velocity is a step function of time. The solution shows that the transition from an explosion-controlled régime to that of a reattached shock layer is characterized by an oscillation with slowly-varying frequency and amplitude. In the interval of a scaled time 1 [Lt ] t [Lt ] ε−2/3(1+ν), the oscillation frequency is shown to be (1 + ν) (2π)−1t−½(1−ν) and the amplitude varies as t−¼(3+ν) matching the earlier results of Cheng et al. (1961). The approach to the large-time limit, ε1/(1+ν)t → ∞ is found to involve an oscillation with a much reduced frequency, ¼π(1+ν)ε−½t−1, and with an amplitude decaying more rapidly like ε−⅘t−½(4+3ν); this terminal behaviour agrees with the fundamental mode of a shock/acoustic-wave interaction.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1971 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellman, R. & Cooke, K. L. 1963 Differential-Difference Equations. Academic.
Cheng, H. K. 1960 Hypersonic flow with combined leading edge bluntness and boundary layer displacement effects. Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory Report AF-1285-A-4.Google Scholar
Cheng, H. K. 1969 Viscous and inviscid slender-body problems in hypersonic flow. Univ. of Southern California Report USC AE108, pp. 98101.Google Scholar
Cheng, H. K., Hall, G. J., Golian, T. C. & Hertzberg, A. 1961 Boundary-layer displacement and leading-edge bluntness effects in high temperature hypersonic flow. J. Aero. Sci. 28, 353381, 410.Google Scholar
Cheng, H. K. & Kirsch, J. W. 1969 On the gas dynamics of an intense explosion with an expanding contact surface J. Fluid Mech. 39, 289306.Google Scholar
Chernyi, G. G. 1959 Gas Flow at High Supersonic Speed. Moscow: Fizmatgiz. English transl. by R. F. Probstein, appeared as Introduction to Hypersonic Flow, Academic, 1961.
Chu, B. T. 1952 On weak interaction of strong shock and Mach wave generated downstream of the shock J. Aero. Sci. 19, 433446.Google Scholar
Cleary, J. W. 1965 An experiment and theoretical investigation of the pressure distribution and flowfields of blunted cones at hypersonic Mach numbers. N.A.S.A. TN D-2969.Google Scholar
Cleary, J. W. & Axleson, J. A. 1964 Theoretical aerodynamic characteristics of sharp and circularly blunt-wedge airfoils. N.A.S.A. TR-202.Google Scholar
Cole, J. D. 1968 Perturbation Methods in Applied Mathematics. Ginn/Blaisdell.
Cole, J. D. & Kevorkian, J. 1963 Uniformly valid asymptotic approximations for certain nonlinear differential equations. Proc. Int. Symp. Nonlinear Differential Equations and Nonlinear Mechanics. Academic.
Cox, R. N. & Crabtree, L. F. 1965 Elements of Hypersonic Aerodynamics. Academic.
Ellinwood, J. W. 1967 Asymptotic hypersonic flow theory for blunted, slender cones and wedges J. Math. Phys. 46, 281298.Google Scholar
Erd'’lyi, A. 1961 An expansion procedure for singular perturbations Atti. Acad. Sci. Torino cl. Sci. Fix. Mat. Nat. 95, 651672.Google Scholar
Goldworthy, F. A. 1969 On the motion established by a constant energy explosion followed by an expanding piston J. Fluid Mech. 38, 2538.Google Scholar
Guiraud, J. P., Vallée, D. & Zolver, R. 1965 Bluntness effects of hypersonic small disturbance theory. In Basic Developments in Fluid Dynamics, vol. 1 (ed. M. Holt), 127247. Academic.
Hayes, W. D. & Probstein, R. F. 1966 Hypersonic Flow Theory, 1. Academic.
Henderson, A., Watson, R. D. & Wagner, R. D. 1966 Fluid dynamic studies to M = 41 in helium. Amer. Inst. Aero. Astro. J. 4, 21172124.Google Scholar
Kaplun, S. 1967 Fluid Mechanics and Singular Perturbation (ed. P. A. Lagerstrom, L. N. Howard and C. S. Liu). Academic.
Kirsch, J. W. 1969 The unsteady flow field created by an arbitrary expansion of a piston following an energetic, impulsive start. University of Southern California Ph.D. Thesis.
Kuzmak, G. E. 1959 Asymptotic solutions of nonlinear second-order differential equations with variable coefficients Prikl. Mat. Mekh. 23, 515526.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1949 The flow behind a stationary shock Phil. Mag. 40, 214220.Google Scholar
Mirels, H. 1962 Hypersonic flow over slender bodies associated with power-law shocks. Adv. Appl. Mech. 7, 154, 317319.Google Scholar
Moh, T. C. 1971 On shock wave and flow field produced by an instantaneous energy release in a stratified atmosphere with planar and spherical symmetry. USC Ph.D. thesis.
Parker, E. N. 1963 Interplanetary Dynamical Processes. Interscience.
Schneider, W. A. 1968 Asymptotic behaviour of hypersonic flow over blunted slender wedge Amer. Inst. Aero. Astro. J. 6, 22352236.Google Scholar
Stewartson, K. & Thompson, B. W. 1970 Eigenvalues for the blast wave. Phys. Fluids, 13, 227236.Google Scholar
Stollery, J. L. 1970 Hypersonic viscous interaction on curved surfaces J. Fluid Mech. 43, 497511.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, M. D. 1964 Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics. Academic.