Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:54:49.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the far wake and induced drag of aircraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2008

PHILIPPE R. SPALART
PHILIPPE R. SPALART*
Affiliation:
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, PO Box 3707, Seattle, WA 98124, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A set of matched asymptotic expansions is proposed for the flow far behind an aircraft, with the primary purpose of identifying lift, thrust and drag, particularly induced drag, in a unified manner in integral statements of the momentum equation. The fluid in the far wake is inviscid and incompressible, and variations of total pressure are allowed, as are vortex sheets. A notable feature is that the Trefftz-plane approximation is not invoked; instead the wake is taken as fully rolled-up, and the analysis proceeds without the assumption of light loading. Attention is paid to the absolute convergence of integrals over infinite domains and handling of discontinuities. The expansion includes a sink term, which appears new, so that the mass flux through a transverse plane is non-zero, as is the flux of mechanical energy. The lift can be formally attributed to the velocity induced by the bound vortex of the wing, which is at odds with some treatments, although consistent with Prandtl's analysis over a ground plane. The drag contains the integral of ρ(v2 + w2 − u2)/2, as in many treatments of the subject, u being the perturbation velocity along the wake. The negative sign for u2 appears paradoxical on two counts, one of which is resolved here. First, its very presence instead of the + sign, which would lead to the perturbation kinetic energy and therefore a compelling explanation of induced drag, is explained by the longitudinal energy flux. This energy, the integral of ρu2, is continuously provided by the unsteady starting-vortex system and was deposited earlier by the aircraft. Second, it appears that negative drag could be predicted by this equation. This is shown to be impossible, because of inequalities between the integrals of (v2 + w2) and of u2, but the proof is valid only if the vorticity is of only one sign on each side. A general proof of positivity has not been derived, because of nonlinearities, but neither has a counter-example.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 603 , 25 May 2008 , pp. 413 - 430
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Batchelor, G. K. 1964 Axial flow in trailing line vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 20, 645–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. T. 1990 Wing Theory. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroo, I. R. 2001 Drag due to lift: concepts for prediction and reduction. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 33, 587–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maskell, E. C. 1972 Progress towards a method for the measurement of the components of the drag of a wing of finite span. R. Aircraft Est. Tech. Rep. 72232.Google Scholar
Milne-Thompson, L. M. 1958 Theoretical Aerodynamics. Dover.Google Scholar
Moin, P., Leonard, A. & Kim, J. 1986 Evolution of a curved vortex filament into a vortex ring. Phys. Fluids 29, 955–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. W. & Saffman, P. G. 1973 Axial flow in laminar trailing vortices. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 333, 491–508.Google Scholar
Prandtl, L. & Tietjens, O. G. 1934 Applied Hydro- and Aeromechanics. Dover.Google Scholar
Sears, W. R. 1974 On calculation of induced drag and conditions downstream of a lifting wing. J. Aircraft 11, 191–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalart, P. R. 1996 On the motion of laminar wing wakes in a stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 327, 139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalart, P. R. 1998 Airplane trailing vortices. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 107–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalart, P. R. 2003 On the simple actuator disk. J. Fluid Mech. 494, 399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spreiter, J. R. & Sacks, A. H. 1951 The rolling up of the trailing vortex sheet and its effect on the downwash behind wings. J. Aero. Sci. 18, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyke, M. 1975 Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics. Parabolic, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar