Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T03:13:43.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the direct initiation of gaseous detonations by an energy source

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Longting He  and
Paul Clavin
Longting He
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Recherche en Combustion, URA 1117 CNRS and Université d’ Aix-Marseille I, Service 252, Centre St-Jérôme, 13397 Marseille CEDEX 20 France
Paul Clavin
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Recherche en Combustion, URA 1117 CNRS and Université d’ Aix-Marseille I, Service 252, Centre St-Jérôme, 13397 Marseille CEDEX 20 France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new criterion for the direct initiation of cylindrical or spherical detonations by a localized energy source is presented. The analysis is based on nonlinear curvature effects on the detonation structure. These effects are first studied in a quasi-steady-state approximation valid for a characteristic timescale of evolution much larger than the reaction timescale. Analytical results for the square-wave model and numerical results for an Arrhenius law of the quasi-steady equations exhibit two branches of solutions with a C-shaped curve and a critical radius below which generalized Chapman–Jouguet (CJ) solutions cannot exist. For a sufficiently large activation energy this critical radius is much larger than the thickness of the planar CJ detonation front (typically 300 times larger at ordinary conditions) which is the only intrinsic lengthscale in the problem. Then, the initiation of gaseous detonations by an ideal point energy source is investigated in cylindrical and spherical geometries for a one-step irreversible reaction. Direct numerical simulations show that the upper branch of quasi-steady solutions acts as an attractor of the unsteady blast waves originating from the energy source. The critical source energy, which is associated with the critical point of the quasi-steady solutions, corresponds approximately to the boundary of the basin of attraction. For initiation energy smaller than the critical value, the detonation initiation fails, the strong detonation which is initially formed decays to a weak shock wave. A successful initiation of the detonation requires a larger energy source. Transient phenomena which are associated with the intrinsic instability of the quasi-steady detonations branch develop in the induction timescale and may induce additional mechanisms close to the critical condition. In conditions of stable or weakly unstable planar detonations, these unsteady phenomena are important only in the vicinity of the critical conditions. The criterion of initiation derived in this paper works to a good approximation and exhibits the huge numerical factor, 106–108, which has been experimentally observed in the critical value of the initiation energy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 277 , 25 October 1994 , pp. 227 - 248
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barenblatt, G. I., Guirguis, R. H., Kamel, M. M., Kuhl, A. L., Oppenheim, A. K. & Zeldovich, Ya. B. 1980 Self-similar explosion waves of variable energy at the front. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 841–859.Google Scholar
Bdzil, J. B. 1981 Steady-state two-dimensional detonation. J. Fluid Mech. 108, 195–226.Google Scholar
Desbordes, D. 1986 Correlations between shock flame predetonation zone size and cell spacing in critically initiated spherical detonations. Prog. Astronaut. Aeronaut. 106, 166.Google Scholar
Erpenbeck, J. J. 1962 Stability of steady-state equilibrium detonations. Phys. Fluids 5, 604–614.Google Scholar
Erpenbeck, J. J. 1963 Structure and stability of the square-wave detonation. In 9th Symp. (Intl) on Combustion, pp. 442–453. Academic.
Fickett, N. & Davis, W. C. 1979 Detonation. University of California Press. Berkeley.
Gelfand, B. E., Frolov, S. M. & Nettleton, M. A. 1991 Gaseous detonations - A selected review. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 17, 327.Google Scholar
He, L. T. 1991 A study of the ignition phenomena. Applications to H2/O2 mixtures. Thèse de l’Université d’Aix-Marseille I (France).
He, L. T. & Clavin, P. 1992 Critical conditions for detonation initiation in cold gaseous mixtures by nonuniform hot pockets of reactive gases. In 24th Symp. (Intl) on Combustion, pp. 1861–1867. The Combustion Institute.
He, L. T. & Clavin, P. 1993 Premixed hydrogen-oxygen flames. Part I: and Part II Flame structure and quasi-isobaric ignition near the flammability limits. Combust. Flame 93, 391–420.Google Scholar
He, L. T. & Larrouturou, B. 1994 Moving grid numerical simulations of planar time-dependent detonations. J. Comput. Phys. (submitted).Google Scholar
Joulin, G. & Clavin, P. 1976 Analyse asymptotique des conditions d’extinction des flammes laminaires. Acta Astronautica 3, 223–240.Google Scholar
Klein, R. & Stewart, D. S. 1993 The influence of the reaction rate - state dependence on the curvature-detonation speed relation. SIAM J. Appl. Maths 54, 1401.Google Scholar
Korobeinikov, V. P. 1971 Gas dynamics of explosions. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 3, 317–346.Google Scholar
Laffitte, P. 1925 Recherches experimentales sur l’onde explosive et l’onde de choc. Ann. Phys. 10, 623–634.Google Scholar
Landau, L. & Lifchitz, E. 1989 Mecanique des Fluids, 2nd Edn. MIR.
Lee, H. I. & Stewart, D. S. 1990 Calculation of linear detonation instability: one-dimensional instability of plane detonations. J. Fluid Mech. 216, 103.Google Scholar
Lee, J. H. 1977 Initiation of gaseous detonation. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 28, 75–104.Google Scholar
Lee, J. H. 1984 Dynamic parameters of gaseous detonations. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16, 311–336.Google Scholar
Liñan, A. 1974 The asymptotic structure of counter flow diffusion flames for large activation energies. Acta Astronautica 1, 1007–1039.Google Scholar
Sedov, L. I. 1946 Propagation of strong blast waves. Prikl. Mat. Mech. 10, 241–250.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1950a The dynamics of the combustion products behind plane and spherical detonation front in explosives. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 200, 235–247.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1950b The formation of a blast wave by a very intense explosion I. Theoretical discussion. Proc. R. Soc. Lond A 201, 159–174.Google Scholar
Zeldovich, Ya. B. 1940 On the theory of detonation propagation in gaseous systems. In Selected Works of Yakov Borisvich Zeldovich, Volume I Chemical Physics and Hydrodynamics (ed. J. P. Ostriker, G. I. Barenblatt & R. A. Sunyaev), 1992, pp. 411–451. Princeton University Press.
Zeldovich, Ya. B. 1942 Distribution of pressure and velocity in the products of a detonation explosion, and in particular in the case of a spherical propagation of the detonation waves. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. (USSR) 12, 389–406.Google Scholar
Zeldovich, Ya, B., Kogarko, S. M. & Simonov, N. N. 1956 An experimental investigation of spherical detonation of gases. Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys. 1 (8), 1689–1731.Google Scholar