Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T23:46:28.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On steady compressible flows with compact vorticity; the compressible Stuart vortex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2000

D. I. MEIRON
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
D. W. MOORE
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Queens Gate London SW7 2BZ, UK
D. I. PULLIN
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

Abstract

Numerical and analytical solutions to the steady compressible Euler equations corresponding to a compressible analogue of the linear Stuart vortex array are presented. These correspond to a homentropic continuation, to finite Mach number, of the Stuart solution describing a linear vortex array in an incompressible fluid. The appropriate partial differential equations describing the flow correspond to the compressible homentropic Euler equations in two dimensions, with a prescribed vorticity–density–streamfunction relationship. In order to construct a well-posed problem for this continuation, it was found, unexpectedly, to be necessary to introduce an eigenvalue into the vorticity–density–streamfunction equation. In the Rayleigh–Janzen expansion of solutions in even powers of the free-stream Mach number M, this eigenvalue is determined by a solvability condition. Accurate numerical solution by both finite-difference and spectral methods are presented for the compressible Stuart vortex, over a range of M, and of a parameter corresponding to a confined mass-flow rate. These also confirm the nonlinear eigenvalue character of the governing equations. All solution branches followed numerically were found to terminate when the maximum local Mach number just exceeded unity. For one such branch we present evidence for the existence of a very small range of M over which smooth transonic shock-free flow can occur.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)