Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T23:48:12.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On boundary-layer flow past two-dimensional obstacles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

F. T. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College, London SW7 2BZ
P. W. M. Brighton
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Silver Street, Cambridge Present address: Applied Mathematics Department, Science Group, Pilkington Brothers Ltd, Research & Development Laboratories, Lathom, Ormskirk, Lancs. L40 5UF.
P. S. Jackson
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Silver Street, Cambridge Present address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
J. C. R. Hunt
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Silver Street, Cambridge

Abstract

A complete description is sought for the two-dimensional laminar flow response of an incompressible boundary layer encountering a hump on an otherwise smooth boundary. Given that the typical Reynolds number Re (based on the development length L* of the boundary layer) is large, the flow characteristics depend on only two parameters, the non-dimensional length and height scales l, h of the obstacle. For short humps of length less than the familiar O(Re−⅜) triple-deck size the critical height scale, which produces a nonlinear interaction and hence the prospect of separation, is of order $Re^{-\frac{1}{2}}l^{\frac{1}{3}}$. For long humps whose length is greater than the triple-deck size the corresponding critical height scale is much bigger, of order $l^{\frac{5}{3}}$. Height scales below critical produce only a weak flow response while height scales above critical force relatively large-scale separated motions to occur. In the paper the flow structures and typical solutions produced by two representative cases, a short obstacle of length comparable with the oncoming boundary-layer thickness and a long obstacle of height comparable with the boundary-layer thickness, are mainly considered. The former case is controlled by the unknown pressure force induced locally in the flow near the hump and by two length scales, that of the hump itself and that of the longer triple deck. The latter case is governed mainly by the inviscid externally produced pressure force. Alternatively, however, all the dominant flow properties in both cases can be obtained as special or limiting solutions of the triple-deck problem. Comparisons between the cases studied are also presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1981 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brighton, P. W. M. 1977 Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
Counihan, J., Hunt, J. C. R. & Jackson, P. S. 1974 J. Fluid Mech. 64, 529.
Dijkstra, D. 1978 Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics, Tbilisi, U.S.S.R.
Fornberg, B. 1980 J. Fluid Mech. 98, 819.
Goldstein, S. 1948 Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 1, 43.
Hall, D. J. 1968 Ph.D. thesis, University of Liverpool.
Haussling, H. J. 1979 J. Atmos. Sci. 34, 589.
Hunt, J. C. R. 1971 J. Fluid Mech. 49, 159.
Jackson, P. S. 1973 Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
Jackson, P. S. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1975 Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 101, 929.
Kirchhoff, G. 1869 J. reine angew. Math. 70, 289.
Kiya, M. & Arie, M. 1975 J. Fluid Mech. 69, 803.
Lighthill, M. J. 1957 J. Fluid Mech. 3, 113.
Mason, P. J. & Sykes, R. I. 1979 Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 105, 393.
Messiter, A. F. 1979 Proc. U.S. Appl. Mech. Congr. 1978, University of California, Los Angeles.
Napolitano, M., Davis, R. T. & Werle, M. J. 1978 A.I.A.A. 11th Fluid & Plasma Dyn. Conf., Seattle, no. 78–1133.
Smith, F. T. 1973 J. Fluid Mech. 57, 803.
Smith, F. T. 1976a Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 29, 343.
Smith, F. T. 1976b Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 29, 365.
Smith, F. T. 1977 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 356, 443.
Smith, F. T. 1979a J. Fluid Mech. 92, 171.
Smith, F. T. 1979b J. Fluid Mech. 90, 725.
Smith, F. T. 1979c Lecture course on ‘Theory of Laminar Streaming Flows’, presented at C.I.S.M., Udine, Italy, October 1979; also to appear as review in J. Inst. Math. Applic. (1981).
Smith, F. T. & Daniels, P. G. 1981 J. Fluid Mech. 110, 1.
Smith, F. T. & Duck, P. W. 1980 J. Fluid Mech. 98, 727.
Smith, F. T., Sykes, R. I. & Brighton, P. W. M. 1977 J. Fluid Mech. 83, 163.
Sobey, I. J. 1977 J. Fluid Mech. 83, 33.
Stewartson, K. 1970 J. Fluid Mech. 44, 347.
Stewartson, K. 1974 Advs Appl. Mech. 14, 145.
Stratford, B. S. 1954 Aero. Res. Counc. R. & M. no. 3002.
Sychev, V. V. 1972 Izv. Akad. Nauk S.S.S.R. Mekh. Zhid. i Gaza, 3, 47.
Sykes, R. I. 1978 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 361, 225.
Sykes, R. I. 1980 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 373, 311.
Sykes, R. I. 1981 In preparation.