Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T11:03:27.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A numerical simulation of the interaction of a compliant wall and inviscid flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Anthony D. Lucey  and
Peter W. Carpenter
Anthony D. Lucey
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
Peter W. Carpenter
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A method for numerically simulating the hydroelastic behaviour of a passive compliant wall of finite dimensions is presented. Using unsteady potential flow, the perturbation pressures which arise from wall disturbances of arbitrary form are calculated through a specially developed boundary-element method. These pressures may then be coupled to a suitable solution procedure for the wall mechanics to produce an interactive model for the wall/flow system. The method is used to study the two-dimensional disturbances which may occur on a Kramer-type compliant wall of finite length. Finite-difference methods are used to yield wall solutions driven by the fluid pressure after some perturbation from the equilibrium position. Thus, histories of surface deflection and wall energy are obtained. Such a modelling of the physics of the system requires no presupposition of disturbance form.

A thorough investigation of divergence instability is carried out. Most of the results presented in this paper concern the response of the compliant wall while (and after) a point pressure pulse, carried in the applied flow, travels over the compliant panel. Above a critical flow speed and once sufficient time has passed, the compliant wall is shown to adopt the particular profile of an unstable mode. After this divergence mode has been established, instability is realized as a slowly travelling downstream wave. These features are in agreement with the findings of experimental studies. The role of wall damping is clarified: damping serves only to reduce the growth rate of the instability, leaving its onset flow speed unchanged. The present predictions provide an improvement upon some of the unrealistic aspects of predictions yielded by travelling-wave and standing-wave treatments of divergence instability.

The response of a long compliant panel after a single-point pressure-pulse initiation, applied at its midpoint, is simulated. At flow speeds higher than a critical value, parts of the formerly (at subcritical flow speeds) upstream-travelling wave system change to travel downstream and show amplitude growth. The development of this ‘upstream-incoming’ wave illustrates how divergence instability can occur at locations upstream of the point of initial excitation. Faster flexural waves transmit energy upstream, thereafter these disturbances can evolve into slow downstreamtravelling divergence waves. The spread of the instability to locations both downstream and upstream of the point of initial excitation indicates that divergence is an absolute instability. This behaviour and the effects of wall damping clarified by the present work strongly suggest that divergence is a Class C instability.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 234 , January 1992 , pp. 121 - 146
Copyright
© 1992 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkins, D. J. 1982 The effect of uniform flow on the dynamics and acoustics of force-excited infinite plates. Tech. Memo, AMTE (N) TM 82087. Admiralty Marine Technology Establishment, Teddington, UK.
Balasubramanian, R. & Orszag, S. A. 1983 Numerical studies of laminar and turbulent drag reductions. NASA Contract Rep. 3669.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1960 Effects of a flexible boundary on hydrodynamic stability. J. Fluid Mech. 9, 513–532.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1963 The threefold classification of unstable disturbances in flexible surfaces bounding inviscid flows. J. Fluid Mech. 16, 436–450.Google Scholar
Brazier-Smith, P. R. & Scott, J. F. 1984 Stability of fluid flow in the presence of a compliant surface. Wave Motion 6, 547–560.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. W. 1990 Status of transition delay using compliant walls. In Viscous Drag Reduction in Boundary Layers (ed. D. M. Bushnell & J. M. Hefner), pp. 113–113. AIAA.
Carpenter, P. W. & Gajjar, J. S. B. 1990 A general theory for two- and three-dimensional wall-mode instabilities in boundary layers over isotropic and anisotropic compliant walls. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 1, 349–378.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. W. & Garrad, A. D. 1985 The hydrodynamic stability of flows over Kramer-type compliant surfaces. Part 1. Tollmien-Schlichting instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 155, 465–510.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. W. & Garrad, A. D. 1986 The hydrodynamic stability of flows over Kramer-type compliant surfaces. Part 2. Flow-induced surface instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 170, 199–232.Google Scholar
Daniel, A. P., Gaster, M. & Willis, G. J. K. 1987 Boundary layer stability on compliant surfaces. British Maritime Technology Ltd., UK, Report, April 1987.
Domaradzki, J. A. & Metcalfe, R. W. 1987 Stabilization of laminar boundary layers by compliant membranes. Phys. Fluids 30, 695–705.Google Scholar
Dowell, E. H. 1975 Aeroelasticity of Plates and Shells. Noordhoff.
D', J. M. & Dalton, C. 1990 The dynamic response of compliant materials to an impulsive pressure field. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Engng 29, 811–831.Google Scholar
Dugundji, J., Dowell, E. & Perkin, B. 1963 Subsonic flutter of panels on a continuous elastic foundation. AIAA J. 1, 1146–1154.Google Scholar
Duncan, J. H., Waxman, A. M. & Tulin, M. P. 1985 The dynamics of waves at the interface between a viscoelastic coating and a fluid flow. J. Fluid Mech. 158, 177–197.Google Scholar
Ellen, C. H. 1973 The stability of simple supported rectangular surfaces in uniform subsonic flow. Trans. ASME, E: J. Appl. Mech. 95, 68–72.Google Scholar
Evrensel, C. A. & Kalnins, A. 1988 Response of a compliant slab to a viscous incompressible fluid flow. Trans ASME E: J. Appl. Mech. 55, 660–666.Google Scholar
Gad-el-Hak, M. 1985a The response of elastic and viscoelastic surfaces to a turbulent boundary layer. Trans. ASME E: J. Appl. Mech. 53, 206–212.Google Scholar
Gad-el-Hak, M. 1986b Boundary-layer interactions with compliant coatings: An overview. Appl. Mech. Rev. 39, 511–523.Google Scholar
Gad-el-Hak, M., Blackwelder, R. F. & Riley, J. F. 1984 On the interaction of compliant coatings with boundary-layer flows. J. Fluid Mech. 140, 257–280.Google Scholar
Garrad, A. D. & Carpenter, P. W. 1982 A theoretical investigation of flow-induced instabilities in compliant coatings. J. Sound Vib. 84, 483–500.Google Scholar
Gaster, M. 1987 Is the dolphin a red herring? In Proc. IUTAM Symp. on Turbulence Management & Relaminarisation, Bangalore, India (ed. H. W. Liepmann & R. Narasimha), pp. 304–304. Springer.
Hansen, R. J. & Hunsten, D. L. 1974 An experimental study of turbulent flows over compliant surfaces. J. Sound Vib. 34, 297–308.Google Scholar
Hansen, R. J. & Hunsten, D. L. 1983 Fluid-property effects on flow-generated waves on a compliant surface. J. Fluid Mech. 133, 161–177.Google Scholar
Hess, J. L. 1973 Higher order numerical solution of the integral equation for the two-dimensional Neumann problem. Computer Meth. Appl. Mech Engng 2, 1–15.Google Scholar
Hess, J. L. & Smith, A. M. O. 1966 Calculation of potential flow about arbitrary bodies. Prog. Aeronaut. Sci. 8, 1–138.Google Scholar
Hunt, B. 1978 The panel method for subsonic aerodynamic flows: A survey of mathematical formulations and numerical methods and an outline to the new British Aerospace scheme. In Computational Fluid Mechanics (ed. W. Kollmann), pp. 165–165, Hemisphere.
Kendall, J. M. 1970 The turbulent boundary layer over a wall with progressive waves. J. Fluid Mech. 41, pp. 281–281.Google Scholar
Kramer, M. O. 1960 Boundary-layer stabilisation by distributed damping. J. Am. Soc. Naval Engrs 72, 25–33; J. Aero/Space Sci. 27, 69.Google Scholar
Landahl, M. T. 1962 On the stability of a laminar incompressible boundary-layer over a flexible surface. J. Fluid Mech. 13, 609–632.Google Scholar
Lucey, A. D. 1989 Hydroelastic instability of flexible surfaces. PhD. thesis, University of Exeter, UK.
Lucey, A. D., Carpenter, P. W. & Dixon, A. E. 1991 The rôle of wall instabilities in boundarylayer transition over compliant walls. In Proc. Boundary Layer Transition and Control, Cambridge, UK, April 1991. pp. 35.1–35.10. Royal Aeronautical Society.
McMichael, J. M., Klebanoff, P. S. & Mease, N. E. 1980 Experimental investigation of drag on a compliant surface. In Viscous Drag Reduction (ed. G. R. Hough). AIAA Prog. Astro. Aero., vol. 72, pp. 438–438.
Metcalfe, R. W., Battistoni, F., Ekroot, J. & Orszag, S. A. 1991 Evolution of boundary layer flow over a compliant wall during transition to turbulence. In Proc. Boundary Layer Transition and Control, Cambridge, UK, April 1991, pp. 36.1–36.14. Royal Aeronautical Society.
Puryear, F. W. 1962 Boundary-layer control drag reduction by compliant surfaces. US Department of Navy, David Taylor Basin Rep. 1668.Google Scholar
Riley, J. R., Gad-el-Hak, M. & Metcalfe, R. W. 1988 Compliant coatings. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 393–420.Google Scholar
Sen, P. K. & Arora, D. S. 1988 On the stability of a laminar boundary-layer flow over a flat plate with a compliant surface. J. Fluid Mech. 197, 201–240.Google Scholar
Weaver, D. S. & Unny, T. S. 1971 The hydroelastic stability of a flat plate. Trans. ASME E: J. Appl. Mech. 37, 823–827.Google Scholar
Willis, G. J. K. 1986 Hydrodynamic stability of boundary layers over compliant surfaces. Ph.D thesis, University of Exeter, UK.