Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-30T19:05:52.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A non-singular integral equation formulation to analyse multiscale behaviour in semi-infinite hydraulic fractures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2015

E. V. Dontsov  and
A. P. Peirce
E. V. Dontsov
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BCV6T 1Z2, Canada
A. P. Peirce*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BCV6T 1Z2, Canada
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study revisits the problem of a steadily propagating semi-infinite hydraulic fracture in which the processes of toughness-related energy release, viscous dissipation and leak-off compete on multiple length scales. This problem typically requires the solution of a system of integro-differential equations with a singular kernel, which is complicated by the need to capture extremely disparate length scales. In this study the governing equations are rewritten in the form of one non-singular integral equation. This reformulation enables the use of standard numerical techniques to capture the complete multiscale behaviour accurately and efficiently. This formulation also makes it possible to approximate the problem by a separable ordinary differential equation, whose closed-form solution captures the multiscale behaviour sufficiently accurately to be used in practical applications. We also consider a similar reformulation of the equations governing the propagation of a buoyancy-driven semi-infinite hydraulic fracture. The resulting numerical solution is able to capture the near-tip multiscale behaviour efficiently and agrees well with published solutions calculated in the large-toughness limit.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Boundary layer structure Geophysical and Geological Flows: Magma and lava flow Low-Reynolds-number flows: Porous media
Type
Rapids
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 781 , 25 October 2015 , R1
Copyright
© 2015 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA.

References

Carter, E. D. 1957 Optimum fluid characteristics for fracture extension. In Drilling and Production Practices (ed. Howard, G. C. & Fast, C. R.), pp. 261–270. American Petroleum Institute.Google Scholar
Desroches, J., Detournay, E., Lenoach, B., Papanastasiou, P., Pearson, J. R. A, Thiercelin, M. & Cheng, A. H.-D. 1994 The crack tip region in hydraulic fracturing. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 447, 39–48.Google Scholar
Detournay, E. 2004 Propagation regimes of fluid-driven fractures in impermeable rocks. Intl J. Geomech. 4, 35–45.Google Scholar
Garagash, D. & Detournay, E. 2000 The tip region of a fluid-driven fracture in an elastic medium. J. Appl. Mech. 67, 183–192.Google Scholar
Garagash, D. I., Detournay, E. & Adachi, J. I. 2011 Multiscale tip asymptotics in hydraulic fracture with leak-off. J. Fluid Mech. 669, 260–297.Google Scholar
Gordeliy, E. & Peirce, A. P. 2013 Implicit level set schemes for modeling hydraulic fractures using the XFEM. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng 266, 125–143.Google Scholar
Kovalyshen, Y. & Detournay 2013 Propagation of a semi-infinite hydraulic fracture in a poroelastic medium. In Poromechanics V – Proceedings of the 5th Biot Conference on Poromechanics, pp. 431–437.Google Scholar
Lecampion, B., Peirce, A. P., Detournay, E., Zhang, X., Chen, Z., Bunger, A. P., Detournay, C., Napier, J., Abbas, S., Garagash, D. & Cundall, P. 2013 The impact of the near-tip logic on the accuracy and convergence rate of hydraulic fracture simulators compared to reference solutions. In Effective and Sustainable Hydraulic Fracturing (ed. Bunger, A. P., McLennan, J. & Jeffrey, R.), chap. 43, pp. 855–873. Intech, ISBN: 978-953-51-1137-5.Google Scholar
Lenoach, B. 1995 The crack tip solution for hydraulic fracturing in a permeable solid. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 43, 1025–1043.Google Scholar
Lister, J. R. 1990 Buoyancy-driven fluid fracture: the effects of material toughness and of low-viscosity precursors. J. Fluid Mech. 210, 263–280.Google Scholar
Peirce, A. 2010 A Hermite cubic collocation scheme for plane strain hydraulic fractures. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng 199, 1949–1962.Google Scholar
Peirce, A. & Detournay, E. 2008 An implicit level set method for modeling hydraulically driven fractures. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng 197, 2858–2885.Google Scholar
Peirce, A. P. 2015 Modeling multi-scale processes in hydraulic fracture propagation using the implicit level set algorithm. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng 283, 881–908.Google Scholar
Roper, S. M. & Lister, J. R. 2007 Buoyancy-driven crack propagation: the limit of large fracture toughness. J. Fluid Mech. 580, 359–380.Google Scholar
Spence, D., Sharp, P. & Turcotte, D. 1987 Buoyancy-driven crack propagation: a mechanism for magma migration. J. Fluid Mech. 174, 135–153.Google Scholar
Spence, D. & Turcotte, D. 1985 Magma-driven propagation of cracks. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 575–580.Google Scholar