Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T09:12:15.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nonlinear effects in reflecting and colliding internal wave beams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2005

ALI TABAEI
Affiliation:
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
T. R. AKYLAS
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
KEVIN G. LAMB
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1

Abstract

Using small-amplitude expansions, we discuss nonlinear effects in the reflection from a sloping wall of a time-harmonic (frequency $\omega$) plane-wave beam of finite cross-section in a uniformly stratified Boussinesq fluid with constant buoyancy frequency $N_{0}$. The linear solution features the incident and a reflected beam, also of frequency $\omega$, that is found on the same (opposite) side to the vertical as the incident beam if the angle of incidence relative to the horizontal is less (greater) than the wall inclination. As each of these beams is an exact nonlinear solution, nonlinear interactions are confined solely in the vicinity of the wall where the two beams meet. At higher orders, this interaction region acts as a source of a mean and higher-harmonic disturbances with frequencies $n\omega$ ($n\,{=}\,2,3,\ldots$); for $n\omega\,{<}\,N_{0}$ the latter radiate in the far field, forming additional reflected beams along $\sin^{-1}(n\omega/N_{0})$ to the horizontal. Depending on the flow geometry, higher-harmonic beams can be found on the opposite side of the vertical from the primary reflected beam. Using the same approach, we also discuss collisions of two beams propagating in different directions. Nonlinear interactions in the vicinity of the collision region induce secondary beams with frequencies equal to the sum and difference of those of the colliding beams. The predictions of the steady-state theory are illustrated by specific examples and compared against unsteady numerical simulations.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)