Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T04:31:39.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Near-critical swirling flow of a viscoelastic fluid in a circular pipe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2017

Zvi Rusak ,
Nguyen Ly ,
John A. Tichy  and
Shixiao Wang
Zvi Rusak*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590, USA
Nguyen Ly
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590, USA
John A. Tichy
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590, USA
Shixiao Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The interaction between flow inertia and elasticity in high-Reynolds-number, axisymmetric and near-critical swirling flows of an incompressible and viscoelastic fluid in an open finite-length straight circular pipe is studied at the limit of low elasticity. The stresses of the viscoelastic fluid are described by the generalized Giesekus constitutive model. This model helps to focus the analysis on low fluid elastic effects with shear thinning of the viscosity. The application of the Giesekus model to columnar streamwise vortices is first investigated. Then, a nonlinear small-disturbance analysis is developed from the governing equations of motion. It reveals the complicated interactions between flow inertia, swirl and fluid rheology. An effective Reynolds number that links between steady states of swirling flows of a viscoelastic fluid and those of a Newtonian fluid is revealed. The effects of the fluid viscosity, relaxation time, retardation time and mobility parameter on the flow development in the pipe and on the critical swirl for the appearance of vortex breakdown are explored. It is found that in vortex flows with either an axial jet or an axial wake profile, increasing the shear thinning by decreasing the ratio of the viscoelastic characteristic times from one (with fixed values of the Weissenberg number and the mobility parameter) increases the critical swirl ratio for breakdown. Increasing the fluid elasticity by increasing the Weissenberg number from zero (with a fixed ratio of the viscoelastic characteristic times and a fixed value of the mobility parameter) or increasing the fluid mobility parameter from zero (with fixed values of the Weissenberg number and the ratio of viscoelastic times) causes a similar effect. The results may explain the trend of changes in the appearance of breakdown zones as a function of swirl level that were observed in the experiments by Stokes et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 429, 2001, pp. 67–115), where Boger fluids were used. This work extends for the first time the theory of vortex breakdown to include effects of non-Newtonian fluids.

JFM classification

Non-Newtonian Flows: Non-Newtonian Flows Vortex Flows: Vortex breakdown Vortex Flows: Vortex instability
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 814 , 10 March 2017 , pp. 325 - 360
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Althaus, W., Bruecker, C. & Weimer, M. 1995 Breakdown of slender vortices. In Fluid Vortices, pp. 373–426. Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1962 Theory of the vortex breakdown phenomenon. J. Fluid Mech. 14, 593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beran, P. S. 1994 The time-asymptotic behavior of vortex breakdown in tubes. Comput. Fluids 23 (7), 913–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beran, P. S. & Culick, F. E. C. 1992 The role of non-uniqueness in the development of vortex breakdown in tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 242, 491–527.Google Scholar
Bird, R. B., Armstrong, R. C. & Hassager, O. 1987a Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids. Volume 1: Fluid Mechanics, 2nd edn. Wiley.Google Scholar
Bird, R. B., Armstrong, R. C. & Hassager, O. 1987b Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids. Volume 2: Kinetic Theory, 2nd edn. Wiley.Google Scholar
Bohme, G., Rubart, L. & Stenger, M. 1992 Vortex breakdown in shear-thinning liquids: experiment and numerical simulation. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 45, 1–20.Google Scholar
Boger, D. V. 1977/78 A highly elastic constant viscosity fluid. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 3, 87–91.Google Scholar
Chiao, S.-M. F. & Chang, H.-C. 1990 Instability of Criminiale–Filbey fluid in a disk-and-cylinder system. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 36, 361–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darmofal, D. L. 1996 Comparisons of experimental and numerical results for axisymmetric vortex breakdown in pipes. Comput. Fluids 25 (4), 353–371.Google Scholar
Day, C., Harris, J. A., Soria, J., Boger, D. V. & Welsh, C. M. 1996 Behavior of elastic fluid in cylindrical swirling flow. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 12, 250–255.Google Scholar
Escudier, M. P. 1988 Vortex breakdown: observations and explanations. Prog. Aeronaut. Sci. 25, 189–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudier, M. P. & Cullen, L. M. 1996 Flow of shear-thinning liquid in a cylindrical container with a rotating end wall. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 12, 381–387.Google Scholar
Giesekus, H. 1982 A simple constitutive equation for polymer fluids based on the concept of deformation-dependent tensorial mobility. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 11 (1–2), 69–109.Google Scholar
Giesekus, H. 1983 Stressing behaviour in simple shear flow as predicted by a new constitutive model for polymer fluids. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 12 (3), 367–374.Google Scholar
Haj-Hariri, H. & Homsy, G. M. 1997 Three-dimensional instability of viscoelastic elliptic vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 353, 357–381.Google Scholar
Hall, M. G. 1972 Vortex breakdown. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 4, 195–217.Google Scholar
Hill, C. T., Huppler, J. D. & Bird, R. B. 1966 Secondary flows in the disk-and-cylinder system. Chem. Engng Sci. 21, 815–817.Google Scholar
James, D. F. 2009 Boger fluids. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, H. 1929 The Earth. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leibovich, S. 1978 The structure of vortex breakdown. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 10, 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibovich, S. 1984 Vortex stability and breakdown: survey and extension. AIAA J. 22, 1192–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, J. M. 1994 On the bifurcation structure of axisymmetric vortex breakdown in a constricted pipe. Phys. Fluids 6 (11), 3683–3693.Google Scholar
Malkiel, E., Cohen, J., Rusak, Z. & Wang, S. 1996 Axisymmetric vortex breakdown in a pipe – theoretical and experimental studies. Proc. 36th Israel Ann. Conf. Aerospace Sci. (Tel Aviv and Haifa, Israel). pp. 24–34. Technion.Google Scholar
Mattner, T. W., Joubert, P. N. & Chong, M. S. 2002 Vortical flow. Part 1. Flow through a constant-diameter pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 463, 259–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldroyd, J. G. 1950 On the formulation of rheological equations of state. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 200 (1063), 523–541.Google Scholar
Oldroyd, J. G. 1958 Non-Newtonian effects in steady motion of some idealized elastico-viscous liquid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 245 (1241), 278–297.Google Scholar
Rusak, Z. 1998 The interaction of near-critical swirling flows in a pipe with inlet azimuthal vorticity perturbations. Phys. Fluids 10 (7), 1672–1684.Google Scholar
Rusak, Z., Granata, J. & Wang, S. 2015 An active feedback flow control theory of the axisymmetric vortex breakdown process. J. Fluid Mech. 774, 488–528.Google Scholar
Rusak, Z. & Judd, K. P. 2001 The stability of non-columnar swirling flows in diverging streamtubes. Phys. Fluids 13 (10), 2835–2844.Google Scholar
Rusak, Z. & Lamb, D. 1999 Prediction of vortex breakdown in leading-edge vortices above slender delta wings. J. Aircraft 36 (4), 659–667.Google Scholar
Rusak, Z., Wang, S., Xu, L. & Taylor, S. 2012 On the global nonlinear stability of a near-critical swirling flow in a long finite-length pipe and the path to vortex breakdown. J. Fluid Mech. 712, 295–326.Google Scholar
Sarpkaya, T. 1971 Stationary and travelling vortex breakdowns. J. Fluid Mech. 45, 545–559.Google Scholar
Sarpkaya, T. 1995 Turbulent vortex breakdown. Phys. Fluids 7 (10), 2301–2303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, J. R., Graham, L. J. W., Lawson, N. J. & Boger, D. V. 2001 Swirling flow of viscoelastic fluids. Part 1. Interaction between inertia and elasticity. J. Fluid Mech. 429, 67–115.Google Scholar
Umeh, C. O. U., Rusak, Z., Gutmark, E., Villalva, R. & Cha, D. J. 2010 Experimental and computational study of nonreacting vortex breakdown in a swirl-stabilized combustor. AIAA J. 48 (11), 2576–2585.Google Scholar
Vlassopoulos, D. & Hatzikiriakos, S. G. 1995 A generalized Giesekus constitutive model with retardation time and its association to the spurt effect. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 57 (2), 119–136.Google Scholar
Wang, S. & Rusak, Z. 1996 On the stability of an axisymmetric rotating flow in a pipe. Phys. Fluids 8 (4), 1007–1016.Google Scholar
Wang, S. & Rusak, Z. 1997a The dynamics of a swirling flow in a pipe and transition to axisymmetric vortex breakdown. J. Fluid Mech. 340, 177–223.Google Scholar
Wang, S. & Rusak, Z. 1997b The effect of slight viscosity on a near critical swirling flow. Phys. Fluids 9 (7), 1914–1927.Google Scholar