Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T07:29:35.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Momentum and energy of a solitary wave interacting with a submerged semi-circular cylinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2012

Christian A. Klettner  and
Ian Eames
Christian A. Klettner
Affiliation:
University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, UK
Ian Eames
Affiliation:
University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The interaction of a weakly viscous solitary wave with a submerged semi-circular cylinder was examined using high-resolution two-dimensional numerical calculations. Two simulations were carried out: (a) as a baseline calculation, the propagation of a solitary wave over uniform depth; and (b) a solitary wave interacting with a submerged semi-circular cylinder. Large-scale simulations were performed to resolve the viscous boundary layers on the free surface, bottom and around the obstacle. Integral measures such as momentum and energy are analysed and compared against analytical approximations. For uniform depth, the loss in momentum and energy arises from the traction caused by the finite length of the domain bottom and the dissipation which is predominantly within the bottom boundary layer, respectively. The force on the cylinder is composed of (form) drag, inertial and hydrostatic components, the last factor arising from gradients in the height of the free surface. Morison’s semi-empirical equation is shown to provide a leading-order description of the force on the semi-circular cylinder. These elevated rates of change (momentum and energy) return to uniform depth values after a short period of time, indicating a localized effect of the obstacle. To interpret the flow field, vorticity, streamline and second invariant of the velocity gradient tensor plots were used to highlight relative thickness of boundary layers, vorticity distribution throughout the domain and stagnation points in the flow.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Boundary layer separation
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 708 , 10 October 2012 , pp. 576 - 595
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Auton, T. R., Hunt, J. C. R. & Prud’homme, M. 1988 The force exerted on a body in inviscid unsteady non-uniform rotational flow. J. Fluid Mech. 197, 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Batchelor, G. K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
3. Benjamin, T. B. & Olver, P. J. 1982 Hamiltonian structure, symmetries and conservation laws for water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 125, 137–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Chian, C. & Ertekin, R. C. 1992 Diffraction of solitary waves by submerged horizontal cylinders. Wave Motion 15, 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Cooker, M. J., Peregrine, D. H., Vidal, C. & Dold, J. W. 1990 The interaction between a solitary wave and a submerged semicircular cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 215, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Eames, I. 2008 Disappearing bodies and ghost vortices. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 366, 2219–2232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Fernando, H. J. S., Samarawickrama, S. P., Balasubramanian, S., Hettiarachchi, S. S. L. & Voropayev, S. 2008 Effects of porous barriers such as coral reefs on coastal wave propagation. J. Hydro-Environmental Res. 1, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Grimshaw, R. 1971 The solitary wave in water of variable depth. J. Fluid Mech. 46, 611–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hirt, C. W., Amsden, A. A. & Cook, J. L. 1974 An arbitrary–Lagrangian–Eulerian computing method for all flow speeds. J. Comput. Phys. 14, 227–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Huang, C. J. & Dong, C. M. 2001 On the interaction of a solitary wave and a submerged dike. Coast. Engng 43, 265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Hunt, J. C. R. & Hussain, F. 1991 A note on velocity, vorticity and helicity of inviscid fluid elements. J. Fluid Mech. 229, 569–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Jeong, J. & Hussain, F. 1995 Identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 285, 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Jonsson, I. G., Thorup, P. & Tamasauskas, H. T. 2000 Accuracy of asymptotic series for the kinematics of high solitary waves. Ocean Engng 27, 511–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Keulegan, G. H. 1948 Gradual damping of solitary waves. Natl Bur. Stand. – U.S. Dept. Commerce 40, 487–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Klettner, C. A. 2010 On the fundamental principles of waves propagating over complex geometry. PhD thesis. University College London.Google Scholar
16. Klettner, C. A. & Eames, I. 2012 The laminar free surface boundary layer of a solitary wave. J. Fluid Mech. 696, 423–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Kulin, G. 1958 Solitary wave forces on submerged cylinders and plates. Natl Bur. Stand. – U.S. Dept. Commerce 40, 81–98.Google Scholar
18. Lamb, H. 1932 Hydrodynamics, 6th edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
19. Li, Y. & Raichlen, F. 2003 Energy balance model for breaking solitary wave runup. J. Waterways Port Coast. Ocean Engng 129, 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Lin, P. 2004 A numerical study of solitary wave interaction with rectangular obstacles. Coast. Engng 51, 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Lin, C., Chang, S. C., Ho, T. C. & Chang, K. A. 2006 Laboratory observation of solitary wave propagating over a submerged rectangular dike. J. Engng Mech. 132, 545–554.Google Scholar
22. Lin, M. Y. & Huang, L. H. 2010 Vortex shedding from a submerged rectangular obstacle attacked by a solitary wave. J. Fluid Mech. 651, 503–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1983 On integrals and invariants for inviscid, irrotational flow under gravity. J. Fluid Mech. 134, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Losada, M. A., Vidal, C. & Medina, R. 1989 Experimental study of the evolution of a solitary wave at an abrupt junction. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 14557–14566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Madsen, P. A., Fuhrman, D. R. & Schaeffer, H. A. 2008 On the solitary wave paradigm for tsunamis. J. Geophys. Res. 113, C12012.Google Scholar
26. Massey, B. 1998 Mechanics of Fluids, 7th edn. Chapman Hall.Google Scholar
27. McIntyre, M. E. 1981 On the ‘wave momentum’ myth. J. Fluid Mech. 106, 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Mei, C. C. 1989 The Applied Dynamics of Ocean Surface Waves. World Scientific.Google Scholar
29. Morison, J. R., O’Brien, M. P., Johnson, J. W. & Schaaf, S. A. 1950 The force exerted by surface waves on piles. Petrol. Trans. 189, 149–154.Google Scholar
30. Nicolle, A. & Eames, I. 2011 Flow through and around groups of bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 679, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Nithiarasu, P. 2005 An arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) formulation for free surface flows using the characteristic based split (CBS) scheme. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Engng 48, 1415–1428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Prosperetti, A. & Tryggvason, G. 2007 Computational Methods for Multiphase Flow. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Ramaswamy, B. & Kawahara, M. 1987 Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian finite element method for unsteady incompressible viscous free surface flow. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 7, 1053–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Sumer, B. M., Jensen, P. M., Sorensen, L. B., Fredsoe, J. & Liu, P. L. F. 2008 Turbulent solitary wave boundary layer. Proc. 8th Intl. Offshore and Polar Engng. Conference 775–781.Google Scholar
35. Tanaka, H., Sumer, B. M. & Lodahl, C. 1998 Theoretical and experimental investigation on laminar boundary layers under cnoidal wave motion. Coast. Engng Japan 40, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Zienkiewicz, O. C., Taylor, R. L. & Nithiarasu, P. 2005 The Finite Element Method for Fluid Dynamics, vol. 3, 5th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar