Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T00:16:17.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moment generating functions and scaling laws in the inertial layer of turbulent wall-bounded flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2016

Xiang I. A. Yang*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
Ivan Marusic
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Charles Meneveau
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

Properties of single- and two-point moment generating functions (MGFs) are examined in the inertial region of wall-bounded flows. Empirical evidence for power-law scaling of the single-point MGF $\langle \text{exp}(qu^{+})\rangle$ (where $u^{+}$ is the normalized streamwise velocity fluctuation and $q$ a real parameter) with respect to the wall-normal distance is presented, based on hot-wire data from a $Re_{{\it\tau}}=13\,000$ boundary-layer experiment. The parameter $q$ serves as a ‘dial’ to emphasize different parts of the signal such as high- and low-speed regions, for positive and negative values of $q$, respectively. Power-law scaling $\langle \text{exp}(qu^{+})\rangle \sim (z/{\it\delta})^{-{\it\tau}(q)}$ can be related to the generalized logarithmic laws previously observed in higher-order moments, such as in $\langle u^{+2p}\rangle ^{1/p}$, but provide additional information not available through traditional moments if considering $q$ values away from the origin. For two-point MGFs, the scalings in $\langle \text{exp}[qu^{+}(x)+q^{\prime }u^{+}(x+r)]\rangle$ with respect to $z$ and streamwise displacement $r$ in the logarithmic region are investigated. The special case $q^{\prime }=-q$ is of particular interest, since this choice emphasizes rare events with high and low speeds at a distance $r$. Applying simple scaling arguments motivated by the attached eddy model, a ‘scaling transition’ is predicted to occur for $q=q_{cr}$ such that ${\it\tau}(q_{cr})+{\it\tau}(-q_{cr})=1$, where ${\it\tau}(q)$ is the set of scaling exponents for single-point MGFs. This scaling transition is not visible to traditional central moments, but is indeed observed based on the experimental data, illustrating the capabilities of MGFs to provide new and statistically robust insights into turbulence structure and confirming essential ingredients of the attached eddy model.

Type
Rapids
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cebeci, T. & Bradshaw, P. 1977 Momentum Transfer in Boundary Layers. Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. & Krogstad, P.-Å. 2014 A universal scaling for low-order structure functions in the log-law region of smooth-and rough-wall boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 752, 140156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, P., Nickels, T. & Krogstad, P.-Å. 2006 The logarithmic structure function law in wall-layer turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 550, 5160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frish, U. 1995 Turbulence: The Legacy of an Kolmogorov. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopf, E. 1952 Statistical hydromechanics and functional calculus. J. Ration. Mech. Anal. 1 (1), 87123.Google Scholar
Hultmark, M., Vallikivi, M., Bailey, S. & Smits, A. 2012 Turbulent pipe flow at extreme Reynolds numbers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (9), 094501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiménez, J. 2011 Cascades in wall-bounded turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44 (1), 2745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, J. 2013 Near-wall turbulence. Phys. Fluids 25 (10), 101302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Kármán, T. 1930 Mechanische änlichkeit und turbulenz. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 1930, 5876.Google Scholar
Lee, M. & Moser, R. D. 2015 Direct numerical simulation of a turbulent channel flow up to $Re_{{\it\tau}}=5200$ . J. Fluid Mech. 774, 395415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusic, I., Chauhan, K., Kulandaivelu, V. & Hutchins, N. 2015 Evolution of zero-pressure-gradient boundary layers from different tripping conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 783, 379411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusic, I. & Kunkel, G. J. 2003 Streamwise turbulence intensity formulation for flat-plate boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 15 (8), 24612464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusic, I., Monty, J. P., Hultmark, M. & Smits, A. J. 2013 On the logarithmic region in wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 716, R3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meneveau, C. & Chhabra, A. B. 1990 Two-point statistics of multifractal measures. Physica A 164 (3), 564574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meneveau, C. & Marusic, I. 2013 Generalized logarithmic law for high-order moments in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 719, R1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meneveau, C. & Sreenivasan, K. 1991 The multifractal nature of turbulent energy dissipation. J. Fluid Mech. 224, 429484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monin, A. & Yaglom, A.2007 Statistical fluid mechanics: mechanics of turbulence. Volume II. Translated from the 1965 Russian original.Google Scholar
O’Neil, J. & Meneveau, C. 1993 Spatial correlations in turbulence: predictions from the multifractal formalism and comparison with experiments. Phys. Fluids A 5 (1), 158172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A. & Chong, M. 1982 On the mechanism of wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 173217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A., Henbest, S. & Chong, M. 1986 A theoretical and experimental study of wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech 165, 163199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prandtl, L.1925 Report on investigation of developed turbulence. NACA Rep. TM-1231.Google Scholar
Schultz, M. P. & Flack, K. A. 2007 The rough-wall turbulent boundary layer from the hydraulically smooth to the fully rough regime. J. Fluid Mech. 580, 381405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Silva, C., Marusic, I., Woodcock, J. & Meneveau, C. 2015 Scaling of second-and higher-order structure functions in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 769, 654686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smits, A. J., Mckeon, B. J. & Marusic, I. 2011 High-Reynolds number wall turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 353375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woodcock, J. & Marusic, I. 2015 The statistical behaviour of attached eddies. Phys. Fluids 27 (1), 015104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar