Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T20:52:20.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modelling entrainment volume due to surface-parallel vortex interactions with an air–water interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Kelli Hendrickson Open the ORCID record for Kelli Hendrickson [Opens in a new window] ,
Xiangming Yu  and
Dick K.P. Yue Open the ORCID record for Dick K.P. Yue [Opens in a new window]
Kelli Hendrickson*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Xiangming Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Dick K.P. Yue
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider the entrainment volume that results from the quasi-two-dimensional interactions of rising surface-parallel vorticity with an air–water interface. Based on systematic (three-dimensional) direct numerical simulations (DNS) of the canonical problem of a rectilinear vortex pair impinging on and entraining air at the free surface, we develop a phenomenological model to predict the resulting entrainment volume in terms of four key parameters. We identify a new parameter, a circulation flux Froude number $Fr^2_\Xi =|\varGamma |W/a^2\,g$, that predicts the dimensionless volume $\forall$ of entrained air initiated by a coherent vortical structure of circulation $\varGamma$, effective radius $a$, vertical rise velocity $W$ with gravity $g$. For $Fr^2_\Xi$ below some critical value $Fr^2_{\Xi cr}$, no air is entrained. For $Fr^2_\Xi >Fr^2_{\Xi cr}$, the average initial entrainment $\overline {\forall }_o$ scales linearly with ($Fr^2_\Xi -Fr^2_{\Xi cr}$). We also find that $\overline {\forall }_o$ is linearly dependent on circulation Weber number $We_{\varGamma }$ for a range of vortex Bond number $5 \lesssim Bo_{\varGamma } \lesssim 50$, and parabolically dependent on circulation Reynolds $Re_{\varGamma }$ for $Re_{\varGamma }\lesssim 2580$. Outside of these ranges, surface tension and viscosity have little effect on the initial entrainment volume. For the canonical rectilinear vortex problem, the simple model predicts $\overline {\forall }_o$ extremely well for individual coherent structures over broad ranges of $Fr^2_\Xi$, $We_{\varGamma }$, $Bo_{\varGamma }$ and $Re_{\varGamma }$. We evaluate the performance of this parameterisation and phenomenological entrainment model for air entrainment due to the complex periodic vortex shedding and quasi-steady wave breaking behind a fully submerged horizontal circular cylinder. For the range of parameters we consider, the phenomenological model predicts the event-by-event dimensionless entrainment volume measured in the DNS satisfactorily for this complex application.

JFM classification

Multiphase and Particle-laden Flows: Multiphase flow Vortex Flows: Vortex interactions
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 938 , 10 May 2022 , A12
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

André, M.A. & Bardet, P.M. 2017 Free surface over a horizontal shear layer: vorticity generation and air entrainment mechanisms. J. Fluid Mech. 813, 1007–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspden, A., Nikiforkakis, N., Dalziel, S. & Bell, J.B. 2008 Analysis of implicit LES methods. Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 3 (1), 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldy, S. 1993 A generation-dispersion model of ambient and transient bubbles in the close vicinity of breaking waves. J. Geophys. Res. 98 (C10), 18277–18293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biń, A.K. 1993 Gas entrainment by plunging liquid jets. Chem. Engng Sci. 48 (21), 3585–3630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brackbill, J.U., Kothe, D.B. & Zemach, C. 1992 A continuum method for modeling surface tension. J. Comput. Phys. 100 (2), 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, B.K., Hendrickson, K. & Liu, Y. 2016 Nonlinear coupling of interfacial instabilities with resonant wave interactions in horizontal two-fluid plane Couette–Poiseuille flows: numerical and physical observations. J. Fluid Mech. 809, 438–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, A.M., Li, J. & Carrica, P.M. 2016 A mechanistic model of bubble entrainment in turbulent free surface flows. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 86, 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, W.-H.R., Dodd, M.S., Johnson, P.L. & Moin, P. 2021 Identifying and tracking bubbles and drops in simulations: a toolbox for obtaining sizes, lineages, and breakup and coalescence statistics. J. Comput. Phys. 432, 110156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colagrossi, A., Nikolov, G., Durante, D., Marrone, S. & Souto-Iglesias, A. 2019 Viscous flow past a cylinder close to a free surface: benchmarks with steady, periodic and metastable responses, solved by meshfree and mesh-based schemes. Comput. Fluids 181, 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, S.C. 1970 Stability theory for a pair of trailing vortices. AIAA J. 8 (12), 2172–2179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deane, G.B. & Stokes, M.D. 2002 Scale dependence of bubble creation mechanisms in breaking waves. Nature 418 (6900), 839–844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derakhti, M. & Kirby, J.T. 2014 Bubble entrainment and liquid-bubble interaction under unsteady breaking waves. J. Fluid Mech. 761, 464–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dommermuth, D.G. 1993 The laminar interactions of a pair of vortex tubes with a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 246, 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drazen, D.A., et al. 2010 A comparison of model-scale experimental measurements and computational predictions for a large transom-stern wave. In Proceedings of the 28th Symposium on Naval Ship Hydrodynamics. US Office of Naval Research.Google Scholar
Duncan, J.H. 1981 An experimental investigation of breaking waves produced by a towed hydrofoil. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 377 (1770), 331–348.Google Scholar
Duncan, J.H. 1983 The breaking and non-breaking wave resistance of a two-dimensional hydrofoil. J. Fluid Mech. 126, 507–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezure, T., Kimura, N., Miyakoshi, H. & Kamide, H. 2011 Experimental investigation on bubble characteristics entrained by surface vortex. Nucl. Engng Des. 241 (11), 4575–4584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falgout, R.D., Jones, J.E. & Yang, U.M. 2006 The design and implementation of hypre, a library of parallel high performance preconditioners. In Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations on Parallel Computers (ed. A.M. Bruaset & A. Tveito), vol. 51, pp. 267–294. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, T.C., Fullerton, A.M., Terrill, E.J. & Lada, G. 2006 Measurements of the wave fields around the R/V Athena I. In Proceedings of the 26th Symposium on Naval Ship Hydrodynamics. US Office of Naval Research.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, K., Weymouth, G.D., Yu, X. & Yue, D.K.-P. 2019 Wake behind a three-dimensional dry transom stern. Part 1: flow structure and large-scale air entrainment. J. Fluid Mech. 875, 854–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrickson, K., Weymouth, G.D. & Yue, D.K.-P. 2020 Informed component label algorithm for robust identification of connected components with volume-of-fluid method. Comput. Fluids 197, 104373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrickson, K. & Yue, D.K.-P. 2019 a Structures and mechanisms of air-entraining quasi-steady breaking ship waves. J. Ship Res. 63 (2), 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrickson, K. & Yue, D.K.-P. 2019 b Wake behind a three-dimensional dry transom stern. Part 2: analysis and modeling of incompressible highly-variable density turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 875, 884–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J.C.R., Wray, A. & Moin, P. 1988 Eddies, stream, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Tech. Rep. Center for Turbulence Research Report CTR-S88.Google Scholar
Jeong, J. & Hussain, F. 1995 On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 285, 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klettner, C.A. & Eames, I. 2012 Momentum and energy of a solitary wave interacting with a submerged semi-circular cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 708, 576–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, H. 1932 Hydrodynamics, 6th edn. Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Leng, X. & Chanson, H. 2019 Two-phase flow measurements of an unsteady breaking bore. Exp. Fluids 60 (3), 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugt, H.J. & Ohring, S. 1992 The oblique ascent of a viscous vortex pair toward a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 236 (461), 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugt, H.J. & Ohring, S. 1994 The oblique rise of a viscous vortex ring toward a deformable free surface. Meccanica 29, 313–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, G., Shi, F. & Kirby, J.T. 2011 A polydisperse two-fluid model for surf zone bubble simulation. J. Geophys. Res. 116 (5), C05010.Google Scholar
Maertens, A.P. & Weymouth, G.D. 2015 Accurate Cartesian-grid simulations of near-body flows at intermediate Reynolds numbers. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng 283, 106–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masnadi, N., Erinin, M.A., Washuta, N., Nasiri, F., Balaras, E. & Duncan, J.H. 2019 Air entrainment and surface fluctuations in a turbulent ship hull boundary layer. J. Ship Res. 63 (2), 185–201.Google Scholar
Ohring, S. & Lugt, H.J. 1991 Interaction of a viscous vortex pair with a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 227, 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlandi, P. 1990 Vortex dipole rebound from a wall. Phys. Fluids 2 (8), 1429–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S.B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popinet, S. 2009 An accurate adaptive solver for surface-tension-driven interfacial flows. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 5838–5866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popinet, S. 2018 Numerical models of surface tension. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 50, 49–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichl, P., Hourigan, K. & Thompson, M.C. 2005 Flow past a cylinder close to a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 533, 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rood, E.P. 1994 a Interpreting vortex interactions with a free surface. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Engng 116 (1), 91–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rood, E.P. 1994 b Myths, math, and physics of free-surface vorticity. Appl. Mech. Rev. 47 (6), S152–S156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rood, E.P. 1995 Vorticity interactions with a free surface. In Fluid Vortices, chap. 16, pp. 687–730. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarpkaya, T. 1996 Vorticity, free surface, and surfactants. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 28 (1), 83–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarpkaya, T. & Suthon, P. 1991 Interaction of a vortex couple with a free surface. Exp. Fluids 11 (4), 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, J., Lin, J.-C. & Rockwell, D. 1995 Metastable states of a cylinder wake adjacent to a free surface. Phys. Fluids 7 (9), 2099–2101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, J., Lin, J.-C. & Rockwell, D. 1997 Flow past a cylinder close to a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 330, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tran, T., de Maleprade, H., Sun, C. & Lohse, D. 2013 Air entrainment during impact of droplets on liquid surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 726, R3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weymouth, G.D. & Yue, D.K.-P. 2010 Conservative volume-of-fluid method for free-surface simulations on cartesian-grids. J. Comput. Phys. 229 (8), 2853–2865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widnall, S.E. 1975 The structure and dynamics of vortex filaments. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 7 (1), 141–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, D.C., Fu, T.C., Taylor, G.L., Terrill, E.J., Xing, T., Bhushan, S., O'Shea, T.T. & Dommermuth, D.G. 2008 A comparison of full-scale experimental measurements and computational predictions of the transom-stern wave of the R/V Athena I. In Proceedings of the 27th Symposium on Naval Ship Hydrodynamics. US Office of Naval Research.Google Scholar
Yu, X. 2019 Theoretical and numerical study of air entrainment and bubble size distribution in strong free-surface turbulent flow at large Froude and Weber number. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Yu, X., Hendrickson, K., Campbell, B.K. & Yue, D.K.-P. 2019 a Numerical investigation of shear-flow free-surface turbulence and air entrainment at large Froude and Weber numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 880, 209–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, X., Hendrickson, K. & Yue, D.K.-P. 2019 b Scale separation and dependence of entrainment bubble-size distribution in free-surface turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 885, R2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, D. & Tryggvason, G. 1990 The free-surface signature of unsteady, two-dimensional vortex flows. J. Fluid Mech. 218, 547–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar