Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T16:30:46.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The mixing layer: deterministic models of a turbulent flow. Part 2. The origin of the three-dimensional motion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

G. M. Corcos  and
S. J. Lin
G. M. Corcos
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
S. J. Lin
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Present address: Scientific Research Associates, Glastonbury, Conn.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experimental evidence suggests that in the turbulent mixing layer the fundamental mechanism of growth is two-dimensional and little affected by the presence of vigorous three-dimensional motion. To quantify this apparent property and study the growth of streamwise vorticity, we write for the velocity field \[ {\boldmath V}(x, t) = {\boldmath U}(x, z, t) + {\boldmath u}(x, y, z, t), \] where U is two-dimensional and u is three-dimensional. In a first version of the problem U is independent of u, while in the second U is the spanwise average of V. In both cases the equation for u is linearized around U. The equations for U and u are solved simultaneously by a finite-difference calculation starting with a slightly disturbed parallel shear layer.

The solutions provide a detailed description of the growth of the three-dimensional motion. They show that its characteristics are dictated by the distribution of spanwise vorticity which results from roll-up and pairing. Pairing inhibits its growth. The solutions also demonstrate that even when the three-dimensional flow attains large amplitudes it has a negligible effect on the interaction of spanwise vortices and thus on the growth of the layer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 139 , February 1984 , pp. 67 - 95
Copyright
© 1984 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benney, D. J. 1961 J. Fluid Mech. 10, 209.
Bernal, L. P. 1981 The coherent structure of turbulent mixing layers. I. Similarity of the primary structure. II. Secondary streamwise vortex structure. Ph.D. thesis, Calif. Inst. of Tech.
Bernal, L. P., Breidenthal, R. E., Brown, G. L., Konrad, J. H. & Roshko, A. 1980 In Turbulent Shear Flows 2 (ed. L. J. S. Bradbury, F. Durst, B. E. Launder, F. W. Schmidt & J. H. Whitelaw), p. 305. Springer.
Brachet, M. E. & Orszag, S. 1982 Secondary instability of free shear layer flows. Preprint submitted for publication.
Breidenthal, R. 1980 Phys. Fluids 23, 1929.
Breidenthal, R. 1981 J. Fluid Mech. 109, 1.
Cain, A. B., Reynolds, W. C. & Ferziger, J. H. 1981 A three-dimensional simulation of transition and early turbulence in a time-developing mixing layer. Stanford Univ. Dept. Mech. Engng Rep. TF-14.Google Scholar
Corcos, G. M. 1979 The mixing layer: deterministic models of a turbulent flow. Univ. Calif., Berkeley, Coll. Engng Rep. FM-79-2a.Google Scholar
Corcos, G. M. & Sherman, F. S. 1976 J. Fluid Mech. 73, 241.
Corcos, G. M. & Sherman, F. S. 1984 J. Fluid Mech. 139, 29.
Couët, B. & Leonard, A. 1980 Mixing layer simulation by an improved three-dimensional vortex-in-cell algorithm. In Proc. 7th Intl Conf. on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics, Stanford—Ames.
Konrad, D. H. 1977 An experimental investigation of mixing in two-dimensional turbulent shear flows with applications to diffusion-limited chemical reactions. Ph.D. thesis, Calif. Inst. of Tech. (Also Project Squid Tech. Rep. CIT-8-PU, Dec. 1976.)
Liepmann, H. W. & Laufer, J. 1949 Investigation of free turbulent mixing. NACA TN 1257.Google Scholar
Lin, S. J. & Corcos, G. M. 1984 The mixing layer: deterministic models of a turbulent flow: Part 3. The effect of plane strain on the dynamics of streamwise vortices. J. Fluid Mech. (to be published).Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, R. T. & Widnall, S. E. 1982 J. Fluid Mech. 114, 59.
Riley, J. J. & Metcalfe, R. W. 1980 Direct numerical simulation of a perturbed turbulent mixing layer. AIAA 18th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Pasadena, CA: AIAA Reprint 080–0274.Google Scholar
Stuart, J. T. 1963 In Laminar Boundary Layers (ed. L. Rosenhead), chap. 9, 4. Oxford University Press.
Stuart, J. T. 1967 J. Fluid Mech. 29, 417.
Wygnanski, I. J. & Fiedler, H. E. 1969 J. Fluid Mech. 38, 577.