Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:47:37.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurements with a pulsed-wire and a hot-wire anemometer in the highly turbulent wake of a normal flat plate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2006

L. J. S. Bradbury
L. J. S. Bradbury
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Surrey, Guildford, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes an investigation into the response of both the pulsed-wire anemometer and the hot-wire anemometer in a highly turbulent flow. The first part of the paper is concerned with a theoretical study of some aspects of the response of these instruments in a highly turbulent flow. It is shown that, under normal operating conditions, the pulsed-wire anemometer should give mean velocity and longitudinal turbulent intensity estimates to an accuracy of better than 10% without any restriction on turbulence level. However, to attain this accuracy in measurements of turbulent intensities normal to the mean flow direction, there is a lower limit on the turbulent intensity of about 50%. An analysis is then carried out of the behaviour of the hot-wire anemometer in a highly turbulent flow. It is found that the large errors that are known to develop are very sensitive to the precise structure of the turbulence, so that even qualitative use of hot-wire data in such flows is not feasible. Some brief comments on the possibility of improving the accuracy of the hot-wire anemometer are then given.

The second half of the paper describes some comparative measurements in the highly turbulent flow immediately downstream of a normal flat plate. It is shown that, although it is not possible to interpret the hot-wire results on their own, it is possible to calculate the hot-wire response with a surprising degree of accuracy using the results from the pulsed-wire anemometer. This provides a rather indirect but none the less welcome check on the accuracy of the pulsed-wire results, which, in this very highly turbulent flow, have a certain interest in their own right.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 77 , Issue 3 , 8 October 1976 , pp. 473 - 497
Copyright
© 1976 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradbury, L. J. S. & Castro, I. P. 1971 A pulsed-wire technique for velocity measurements in highly turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 49, 657.Google Scholar
Bradbury, L. J. S. & Moss, W. D. 1975 Pulsed wire anemometer measurements in the flow past a normal flat plate in uniform flow and in sheared flow. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Wind Effects on Buildings & Structures, London.
Cook, N. J. & Redfearn, D. 1976 The calibration and use of a. hot wire probe for highly turbulent and reversing flows. J. Ind. Aerodyn. 1, 221.Google Scholar
Davies, M. E. 1975 Wakes of oscillating bluff bodies. Ph.D. thesis, Aeronautics Department, Imperial College.
Downing, P. M. 1972 Reverse flow sensing hot wire anemometer. J. Sci. Instrum. 5, 819.Google Scholar
Gaster, M. 1971 Vortex shedding from slender cones. Proc. Uitam Symp. Recent Res. on Unsteady Boundary Layers, vol. 2, p. 499.Google Scholar
Gaster, M. & Bradbury, L. J. S. 1976 The measurement of the spectra of highly turbulent flows by a randomly triggered pulsed-wire anemometer. J. Fluid Mech. 77, 499.Google Scholar
Gaster, M. & Roberts, J. B. 1975 Spectral analysis of randomly sampled signals. J. Inst. Math. Appl. 15, 195.Google Scholar
Guenkel, A. A., Patel, R. P. & Weber, M. E. 1971 A shrouded hot-wire probe for highly turbulent flows and rapidly reversing flows. Ind. Engng Chem. Fund. 10, 627.Google Scholar
Tani, I., Iuchi, M. & Komoda, H., 1961 Experimental investigations of flow separation over a step. Aero. Res. Inst., Univ. Tokyo Rep. no. 364.Google Scholar
Tutu, N. K. & Chevray, R. 1975 Cross-wire anemometry in high intensity turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 71, 785.Google Scholar