Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:25:45.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Logarithmic scaling of turbulence in smooth- and rough-wall pipe flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2013

M. Hultmark*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
M. Vallikivi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
S. C. C. Bailey
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
A. J. Smits
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

Measurements of the streamwise component of the turbulent fluctuations in fully developed smooth and rough pipe flow are presented over an unprecedented Reynolds number range. For Reynolds numbers $R{e}_{\tau } \gt 20\hspace{0.167em} 000$, the streamwise Reynolds stress closely follows the scaling of the mean velocity profile, independent of the roughness, and over the same spatial extent. This observation extends the findings of a logarithmic law in the turbulence fluctuations as reported by Hultmark, Vallikivi & Smits (Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 108, 2012) to include rough flows. The onset of the logarithmic region is found at a location where the wall distance is equal to ∼100 times the Kolmogorov length scale, which then marks sufficient scale separation for inertial scaling. Furthermore, in the logarithmic region the square root of the fourth-order moment also displays logarithmic behaviour, in accordance with the observation that the underlying probability density function is close to Gaussian in this region.

Type
Papers
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. J., Shockling, M. A., Kunkel, G. J. & Smits, A. J. 2007 Turbulent flow in smooth and rough pipes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 365, 699714.Google ScholarPubMed
Bailey, S. C. C, Kunkel, G. J., Hultmark, M., Vallikivi, M., Hill, J. P., Meyer, K. A., Tsay, C., Arnold, C. B. & Smits, A. J. 2010 Turbulence measurements using a nanoscale thermal anemometry probe. J. Fluid Mech. 663, 160179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Graaff, D. B. & Eaton, J. K. 2000 Reynolds-number scaling of the flat-plate turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 422, 319346.Google Scholar
Flack, K. A., Schultz, M. P. & Shapiro, T. A. 2005 Experimental support for Townsend’s Reynolds number similarity hypothesis on rough walls. Phys. Fluids 17, 035102.Google Scholar
Hama, F. R. 1954 Boundary layer characteristics for smooth and rough surfaces. Trans. Soc. Nav. Archit. Mar. Engrs 62, 333358.Google Scholar
Hultmark, M. 2012 A theory for the streamwise turbulent fluctuations in high Reynolds number pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 707, 575584.Google Scholar
Hultmark, M., Ashok, A. & Smits, A. J. 2011 A new criterion for end conduction effects in hot wire anemometry. Exp. Fluids 22, 055401.Google Scholar
Hultmark, M., Bailey, S. C. C. & Smits, A. J. 2010 Scaling of near-wall turbulence in pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 649, 103113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultmark, M. & Smits, A. J. 2010 Temperature corrections for constant temperature and constant current hot-wire anemometers. Meas. Sci. Technol. 21, 105404.Google Scholar
Hultmark, M., Vallikivi, M., Bailey, S. C. C. & Smits, A. J. 2012 Turbulent pipe flow at extreme Reynolds numbers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 094501.Google Scholar
Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2007 Evidence of very long meandering streamwise structures in the logarithmic region of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, N., Nickels, T. B., Marusic, I. & Chong, M. S. 2009 Hot-wire spatial resolution issues in wall-bounded turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 635, 103136.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J. 2004 Turbulent flows over rough walls. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 173196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, J. & Hoyas, S. 2008 Turbulent fluctuations above the buffer layer of wall-bounded flows. J. Fluid Mech. 611, 215236.Google Scholar
Klewicki, J. C. & Falco, R. E. 1990 On accurately measuring statistics associated with small-scale structure in turbulent boundary layers using hot-wire probes. J. Fluid Mech. 219, 119142.Google Scholar
Kunkel, G. J., Allen, J. J. & Smits, A. J. 2007 Further support for Townsend’s Reynolds number similarity hypothesis in high Reynolds number rough-wall pipe flow. Phys. Fluids 19 (5), 055109.Google Scholar
Langelandsvik, L. I., Kunkel, G. J. & Smits, A. J. 2007 Flow in a commercial steel pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 595, 323339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusic, I. & Kunkel, G. J. 2003 Streamwise turbulence intensity formulation for flat-plate boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 15, 24612464.Google Scholar
Marusic, I., Mathis, R. & Hutchins, N. 2010a High Reynolds number effects in wall turbulence. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 31, 418428.Google Scholar
Marusic, I., Mathis, R. & Hutchins, N. 2010b Predictive model for wall-bounded turbulent flow. Science 329, 193196.Google Scholar
Marusic, I., McKeon, B. J., Monkewitz, P. A., Nagib, H. M., Smits, A. J. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 2010c Wall-bounded turbulent flows: recent advances and key issues. Phys. Fluids 22, 065103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusic, I., Monty, J., Hultmark, M. & Smits, A. J. 2013 On the logarithmic region in wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 716, R3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathis, R., Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2009 Large-scale amplitude modulation of the small-scale structures in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 628, 311337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, B. J., Li, J., Jiang, W., Morrison, J. F. & Smits, A. J. 2003 Pitot probe corrections in fully developed turbulent pipe flow. Meas. Sci. Tech. 14 (8), 14491458.Google Scholar
McKeon, B. J., Li, J., Jiang, W., Morrison, J. F. & Smits, A. J. 2004 Further observations on the mean velocity distribution in fully developed pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 501, 135147.Google Scholar
McKeon, B. J. & Smits, A. J. 2002 Static pressure correction in high Reynolds number fully developed turbulent pipe flow. Meas. Sci. Tech. 13, 16081614.Google Scholar
Meneveau, C. & Marusic, I. 2013 Generalized logarithmic law for high-order moments in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 719, R1.Google Scholar
Millikan, C. B. 1938 A critical discussion of turbulent flows in channels and circular tubes. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Applied Mechanics, pp. 386392. Wiley.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. F., McKeon, B. J., Jiang, W. & Smits, A. J. 2004 Scaling of the streamwise velocity component in turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 508, 99131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, H. C. H., Monty, J. P., Hutchins, N., Chong, M. S. & Marusic, I. 2011 Comparison of turbulent channel and pipe flows with varying Reynolds number. Exp. Fluids 51 (5), 12611281.Google Scholar
Perry, A. E. & Abell, C. J. 1975 Scaling laws for pipe-flow turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 67, 257271.Google Scholar
Perry, A. E. & Abell, C. J. 1977 Asymptotic similarity of turbulence structures in smooth- and rough-walled pipes. J. Fluid Mech. 79, 785799.Google Scholar
Perry, A. E., Henbest, S. M. & Chong, M. S. 1986 A theoretical and experimental study of wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 165, 163199.Google Scholar
Raupach, M. R., Antonia, R. A. & Rajagopalan, S. 1991 Rough-wall turbulent boundary layers. Appl. Mech. Rev. 44, 125.Google Scholar
Shockling, M. A., Allen, J. J. & Smits, A. J. 2006 Roughness effects in turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 564, 267285.Google Scholar
Smits, A. J., McKeon, B. J. & Marusic, I. 2011a High Reynolds number wall turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 353375.Google Scholar
Smits, A. J., Monty, J., Hultmark, M., Bailey, S. C. C., Hutchins, M. & Marusic, I. 2011b Spatial resolution correction for turbulence measurements. J. Fluid Mech. 676, 4153.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tsuji, Y., Lindgren, B. & Johansson, A. V. 2005 Self-similar profile of probability density functions in zero-pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. Fluid Dyn. Res. 37, 293316.Google Scholar
Vallikivi, M., Hultmark, M., Bailey, S. C. C. & Smits, A. J. 2011 Turbulence measurements in pipe flow using a nano-scale thermal anemometry probe. Exp. Fluids 51, 15211527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wosnik, M., Castillo, L. & George, W. K. 2000 A theory for turbulent pipe and channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 421, 115145.Google Scholar
Zagarola, M. V. & Smits, A. J. 1998 Mean-flow scaling of turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 373, 3379.Google Scholar