Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T06:06:01.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laser-Doppler anemometer measurements in drag-reducing channel flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

M. M. Reischman  and
W. G. Tiederman
M. M. Reischman
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater
W. G. Tiederman
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objective of this study was to make velocity measurements in drag-reducing flows which would be sufficient in scope and accuracy to test proposed models of drag-reducing flows and to yield new information about the mechanisms of drag reduction. Consequently, measurements of the mean and turbulence intensity of the streamwise velocity component were made in fully developed, turbulent, drag-reducing flow in a two-dimensional channel with a laser-Doppler anemometer. The anemometer was operated in the individual-realization mode and corrections were made to eliminate statistical biasing of the data. Two polyacrylamides and a polyethylene oxide were used to produce seven flows which had drag reductions ranging from 24 to 41 %. Measurements were also made in water to establish the standard characteristics of the flow channel.

The data show that the drag-reducing mean velocity profile can be divided into three zones: a viscous sublayer, a buffer or interactive region and a logarithmic region. There is no evidence that the viscous sublayers of the drag-reducing channel flows are thicker than those in the solvent flows. In addition the normalized streamwise fluctuations are essentially the same in both the solvent and drag-reducing sublayers. The changes caused by the polymer addition occur in the buffer region. The drag-reducing buffer region is thicker and the velocity profile in the outer flow region adjusts in order to accommodate this buffer-region thickening. The measurements of the streamwise velocity fluctuations also show that the polymer additives redistribute the primary turbulent activity over a broadened buffer region. The normalized magnitude of these fluctuations is, however, considerably lower in these two-dimensional drag-reducing channel flows than in those previously reported by Rudd (1972), Logan (1972) and Kumor & Sylvester (1973). Moreover, the mean velocity profiles in the buffer region do not confirm the hypothesis of Virk, Mickley & Smith (1970) that the data will follow their proposed ‘ultimate profile’ when the drag reduction is less than that given by the maximum asymptote. The mean velocity measurements also show that the proposed methods for predicting the upward shift in the outer portion of the mean velocity profile are inconsistent and lack universality. However, these results do confirm the previous suggestions of Virk (1971), Tomita (1970) and Lumley (1973) that the buffer region is the area of importance and change in drag-reducing flows.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 70 , Issue 2 , 29 July 1975 , pp. 369 - 392
Copyright
© 1975 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Donohue, G. L., Mclaughlin, D. K. & Tiederman, W. G. 1972 Phys. Fluids, 15, 1970.
Donohue, G. L. & Tiederman, W. G. 1971 The effect of a dilute, drag-reducing macromolecular solution on the viscous sublayer of a turbulent channel flow (16 mm motion picture). ASME/ESL Film Library, New York.
Donohue, G. L., Tiederman, W. G. & Reischman, M. M. 1972 J. Fluid Mech. 56, 559.
Eckelmann, H. & Reichardt, H. 1971 Proc. Turbulence in Liquids Symp., University of Missouri-Rolla (ed. J. L. Zakin & G. K. Patterson), p. 144.
Edwards, R. V., Angus, J. C., French, M. J. & Dunning, J. W. 1971 J. Appl. Phys. 42, 837.
Elata, C., Lehrer, J. & Kahanovitz, A. 1966 Israel J. Tech. 4, 87.
Goldstein, R. J. & Adrian, R. J. 1971 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 42, 1317.
Hjelmfelt, A. T. & Mockros, L. F. 1965 Appl. Sci. Res. 18, 149.
Hoyt, J. W. 1972 Trans. A.S.M.E., J. Basic Engng, 94, 258.
Huang, T. T. 1974 Phys. Fluids, 17, 298.
Hussain, A. K. M. F. & Reynolds, W. C. 1970 Stanford University Rep. FM-6.
Karpuk, M. E. 1974 A laser-Doppler anemometer for viscous sublayer measurements. M.S. thesis, Oklahoma State University.
Kim, H. T., Kline, S. J. & Reynolds, W. C. 1971 J. Fluid Mech. 50, 133.
Kline, S. J., Reynolds, W. C., Schraub, F. A. & Runstadler, P. W. 1967 J. Fluid Mech. 30, 741.
Kumor, S. M. & Sylvester, N. D. 1973 A.I.Ch.E. Symp. Ser. no. 130 (ed. N. D. Sylvester), vol. 69, p. 1.
Logan, S. E. 1972 Laser velocimeter measurement of Reynolds stress and turbulence in dilute polymer solutions. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology.
Lumley, J. L. 1969 Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1, 367–384.
Lumley, J. L. 1973 J. Polymer Sci.: Macromol. Rev. 7, 263.
Mclaughlin, D. K. & Tiederman, W. G. 1973 Phys. Fluids, 16, 2082.
Melling, A. & Whitelaw, J. W. 1973 Proc. Turbulence in Liquids Symp., University of Missouri-Rolla (ed. J. L. Zakin & G. K. Patterson), p. 115.
Meyer, W. A. 1966 A.I.Ch.E. J. 12, 522.
Patel, V. C. & Head, M. R. 1969 J. Fluid Mech. 28, 181.
Reischman, M. M. 1973 Laser anemometer measurements in drag-reducing channel flows. Ph.D. thesis, Oklahoma State University.
Rudd, M. J. 1971 Drag reduction. Ch.E. Prog. Symp. Ser. no. 11, vol. 67 (ed. J. G. Savins & P. S. Virk), p. 21.
Rudd, M. J. 1972 J. Fluid Mech. 51, 673.
Seyer, F. A. & Metzner, A. B. 1969 A.I.Ch.E. J. 15, 427.
Tennekes, H. & Lumley, J. L. 1972 A First Course in Turbulence. M.I.T. Press.
Tiederman, W. G., Mclaughlin, D. K. & Reischman, M. M. 1973 Proc. Turbulence in Liquids Symp., University of Missouri-Rolla (ed. J. L. Zakin & G. K. Patterson), p. 172.
Tomita, Y. 1970 Bull. Japan Soc. Mech. Engrs, 13, 935.
Van Driest, E. R. 1970 J. Hydronautics, 4, 120.
Virk, P. W. 1971 J. Fluid Mech. 45, 417.
Virk, P. W., Mickley, H. S. & Smith, K. A. 1970 Trans. A.S.M.E., J. Appl. Mech. E 37, 488.
Zimm, B. H. 1956 J. Chem. Phys. 24, 264.