Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:43:57.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Isotropic turbulence in compact space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2017

Elias Gravanis*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Cyprus University of Technology, P.O. Box 50329, 3603, Limassol, Cyprus
Evangelos Akylas
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Cyprus University of Technology, P.O. Box 50329, 3603, Limassol, Cyprus
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

Isotropic turbulence is typically studied numerically through direct numerical simulations (DNS). The DNS flows are described by the Navier–Stokes equation in a ‘box’, defined through periodic boundary conditions. Ideal isotropic turbulence lives in infinite space. The DNS flows live in a compact space and they are not isotropic in their large scales. Hence, the investigation of important phenomena of isotropic turbulence, such as anomalous scaling, through DNS is affected by large-scale effects in the currently available Reynolds numbers. In this work, we put isotropic turbulence – or better, the associated formal theory – in a ‘box’, by imposing periodicity at the level of the correlation functions. This is an attempt to offer a framework where one may investigate isotropic theories/models through the data of DNS in a manner as consistent with them as possible. We work at the lowest level of the hierarchy, which involves the two-point correlation functions and the Karman–Howarth equation. Periodicity immediately gives us the discrete wavenumber space of the theory. The wavenumbers start from 1.835, 2.896, 3.923, and progressively approach integer values, in an interesting correspondence with the DNS wavenumber shells. Unlike the Navier–Stokes equation, infinitely smooth periodicity is obstructed in this theory, a fact expressed by a sequence of relations obeyed by the normal modes of the Karman–Howarth equation at the endpoints of a unit period interval. Similar relations are imparted to the two-point functions under the condition that the energy spectrum and energy transfer function are realizable. Hence, these relations are necessary conditions for realizability in this theory. Naturally constructed closure schemes for the Karman–Howarth equation do not conform to such relations, thereby destroying realizability. A closure can be made to conform to a finite number of them by adding corrective terms, in a procedure that possesses certain analogies with the renormalization of quantum field theory. Perhaps the most important one is that we can let the spectrum be unphysical (through sign-changing oscillations of decreasing amplitude) for the infinitely large wavenumbers, as long as we can controllably extend the regime where the spectrum remains physical, deep enough in the dissipation subrange so as to be realistically adequate. Indeed, we show that one or two such ‘regularity relations’ are needed at most for comparisons of the predictions of the theory with the current resolution level results of the DNS. For the implementation of our arguments, we use a simple closure scheme previously proposed by Oberlack and Peters. The applicability of our ideas to more complex closures is also discussed.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arfken, G. B. & Weber, H. J. 2005 Mathematical Methods for Physicists. Elsevier Academic.Google Scholar
Donzis, D. A. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 2010 The bottleneck effect and the Kolmogorov constant in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 657, 171188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, G. H. 1949 Divergent Series. Clarendon.Google Scholar
Ishihara, T., Gotoh, T. & Kaneda, Y. 2009 Study of high-Reynolds number isotropic turbulence by direct numerical simulation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, T., Kaneda, Y., Yokokawa, M., Itakura, K. & Uno, A. 2003 Spectra of energy dissipation, enstrophy and pressure by high-resolution direct numerical simulations of turbulence in a periodic box. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 72, 983986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, T., Kaneda, Y., Yokokawa, M., Itakura, K. & Uno, A. 2005 Energy spectrum in the near dissipation range of high resolution direct numerical simulation of turbulence. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 74, 1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, T., Kaneda, Y., Yokokawa, M., Itakura, K. & Uno, A. 2007 Small-scale statistics in high-resolution direct numerical simulation of turbulence: Reynolds number dependence of one-point velocity gradient statistics. J. Fluid Mech. 592, 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Karman, T. & Howarth, L. 1938 On the statistical theory of isotropic turbulence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 164, 192215.Google Scholar
Lamaison, G., Bos, W., Shao, L. & Bertoglio, J.-P. 2007 Decay of scalar variance in isotropic turbulence in a bounded domain. J. Turbul. 8, N4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundgren, T. S. 2003 Linearly Forced Isotropic Turbulence, pp. 461473. Center for Turbulence Research Annual Research Briefs.Google Scholar
McComb, W. D. 1990 The Physics of Fluid Turbulence. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moin, P. & Mahesh, K. 1998 Direct numerical simulations: a tool in turbulence research. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 539578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monin, A. S. & Yaglom, A. M. 1971 Statistical Fluid Mechanics. MIT.Google Scholar
Oberlack, M. 2002 On the decay exponent of isotropic turbulence. Proc. Appl. Maths Mech. 1, 294297.3.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberlack, M. & Peters, N. 1993 Closure of the two-point correlation equation as a basis for Reynolds stress models. Appl. Sci. Res. 51, 533538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peskin, M. E. & Schroeder, D. V. 1995 An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Touil, H., Bertoglio, J.-P. & Shao, L. 2002 The decay of turbulence in a bounded domain. J. Turbul. 31, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y. 2010 Renormalization group theory for fluid and plasma turbulence. Phys. Rep. 488 (1), 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar