Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:21:36.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Instability of the flow of two immiscible liquids with different viscosities in a pipe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

Daniel D. Joseph
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, 107 Akerman Hall. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Michael Renardy
Affiliation:
Mathematics Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 610 Walnut St., Madison, WI 53705
Yuriko Renardy
Affiliation:
Mathematics Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 610 Walnut St., Madison, WI 53705

Abstract

We study the flow of two immiscible fluids of different viscosities and equal density through a pipe under a pressure gradient. This problem has a continuum of solutions corresponding to arbitrarily prescribed interface shapes. The question therefore arises as to which of these solutions are stable and thus observable. Experiments have shown a tendency for the thinner fluid to encapsulate the thicker one. This has been ‘explained’ by the viscous-dissipation principle, which postulates that the amount of viscous dissipation is minimized for a given flow rate. For a circular pipe, this predicts a concentric configuration with the more viscous fluid located at the core. A linear stability analysis, which is carried out numerically, shows that while this configuration is stable when the more viscous fluid occupies most of the pipe, it is not stable when there is more of the thin fluid. Therefore the dissipation principle does not always hold, and the volume ratio is a crucial factor.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1984 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Charles, M. E. & Redberger, R. J. 1961 The reduction of pressure gradients in oil pipelines by the addition of water. Numerical analysis of stratified flows. Can. J. Chem. Engng 40, 7075.Google Scholar
Everage, A. E. 1973 Theory of bicomponent flow of polymer melts. I. Equilibrium Newtonian tube flow. Trans. Soc. Rheol. 17, 629646.Google Scholar
Hasson, D. & Nir, A. 1970 Annular flow of two immiscible liquids. II. Analysis of core-liquid ascent. Can. J. Chem. Engng 48, 521526.Google Scholar
Hickox, C. E. 1971 Instability due to viscosity and density stratification in axisymmetric pipe flow. Phys. Fluids 14, 251262.Google Scholar
Hooper, A. P. & Boyd, W. G. C. 1983 Shear-flow instability at the interface between two viscous fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 128, 507528.Google Scholar
Joseph, D. D., Nguyen, K. & Beavers, G. S. 1984 Non-uniqueness and stability of the configuration of flow of immiscible fluids with different viscosities. J. Fluid Mech. 141, 319345.Google Scholar
Joseph, D. D., Renardy, M. & Renardy, Y. 1983 Instability of the flow of immiscible liquids with different viscosities in a pipe. Maths Res. Center Tech. Summary Rep. 2503.Google Scholar
Lurie, K. A., Cherkaev, A. V. & Fedorov, A. V. 1982 Regularization of optimal design problems for bars and plates. J. Opt. Theor. Appl. 37, 499543.Google Scholar
MacLean, D. L. 1973 A theoretical analysis of bicomponent flow and the problem of interface shape. Trans. Soc. Rheol. 17, 385399.Google Scholar
Minagawa, N. & White, J. L. 1975 Co-extrusion of unfilled and TiO2-filled polyethylene: influence of viscosity and die cross-section on interface shape. Polymer Engng. & Sci. 15, 825830.Google Scholar
Orszag, S. A. & Kells, L. C. 1980 Transition to turbulence in plane Poiseuille and plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 96, 159205.Google Scholar
Raitum, U. E. 1978 The extension of extremal problems connected with a linear elliptic equation. Sov. Math. Dokl. 19, 13421345.Google Scholar
Raitum, U. E. 1979 On optimal control problems for linear elliptic equations. Sov. Math. Dokl. 20, 129132.Google Scholar
Renardy, Y. & Joseph, D. D. 1983 Two-fluid Couette flow between concentric cylinders. Maths Res. Center Tech. Summary Rep. 2622. Submitted to J. Fluid Mech.Google Scholar
Renardy, M. & Joseph, D. D. 1984 Hopf bifurcation in two-component flow. Maths Res. Center Tech. Summary Rep. (to appear).Google Scholar
Southern, J. H. & Ballman, R. L. 1973 Stratified bicomponent flow of polymer melts in a tube. Appl. Polymer Symp. no. 20, 175189.Google Scholar
Tartar, L. 1975 Problèmes de contrôle des coefficients dans des équations aux dérivées partielles. Lecture Notes in Economics & Mathematical Systems, vol. 107, p. 420. Springer.
White, J. L. & Lee, B.-L. 1975 Theory of interface distortion in stratified two-phase flow. Trans. Soc. Rheol. 19, 457479.Google Scholar
Williams, M. C. 1975 Migration of two liquid phases in capillary extrusion: an energy interpretation. AIChE J. 21, 12041207.Google Scholar
Yih, C. S. 1967 Instability due to viscosity stratification. J. Fluid Mech. 27, 337352.Google Scholar
Yu, H. S. & Sparrow, E. M. 1969 Experiments on two-component stratified flow in a horizontal duct. Trans. ASME C: J. Heat Transfer 91, 5158.Google Scholar