Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:36:57.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identifying linear absolute instabilities from differential eigenvalue problems using sensitivity analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2019

L. S. de B. Alves*
Affiliation:
TEM, PGMec, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brazil
S. C. Hirata
Affiliation:
Unité de Mécanique de Lille, UML EA 7512, F-59000, Lille, France
M. Schuabb
Affiliation:
TEM, PGMec, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brazil
A. Barletta
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

Identifying the convective/absolute instability nature of a local base flow requires an analysis of its linear impulse response. One must find the appropriate singularity in the eigenvalue problem with complex frequencies and wavenumbers and prove causality. One way to do so is to show that the appropriate integration contour of this response, a steepest decent path through the relevant singularity, exists. Due to the inherent difficulties of such a proof, one often verifies instead whether this singularity satisfies the collision criterion. In other words, one must show that the branches involved in the formation of this singularity come from distinct halves of the complex wavenumber plane. However, this graphical search is computationally intensive in a single plane and essentially prohibitive in two planes. A significant computational cost reduction can be achieved when root finding procedures are applied instead of graphical ones to search for singularities. They focus on locating these points, with causality being verified graphically a posteriori for a small parametric sample size. The use of root-finding procedures require auxiliary equations, often derived by applying the zero group velocity conditions to the dispersion relation. This relation, in turn, is derived by applying matrix forming to the differential eigenvalue problem and taking the determinant of the resulting system of algebraic equations. Taking the derivative of the dispersion relation with respect to the wavenumbers generates the auxiliary equations. If the algebraic system is decoupled, this derivation is straightforward. However, its computational cost is often prohibitive when the algebraic system is coupled. Other methods exist, but often they can also be too costly and/or not reliable for two wavenumber plane searches. This paper describes an alternative methodology based on sensitivity analysis and adjoints that allow the zero group velocity conditions to be applied directly to the differential eigenvalue problem. In doing so, the direct and auxiliary differential eigenvalue problems can be solved simultaneously using standard shooting methods to directly locate singularities. Auxiliary dispersion relations no longer have to be derived, although it is shown that they are the algebraic equivalent of the auxiliary differential eigenvalue problems obtained by this alternative methodology. Using the latter dramatically reduces computational costs. The search for arbitrary singularities is then not only accelerated in single wavenumber planes but it also becomes viable in two wavenumber planes. Finally, the new method also allows group velocity calculations, greatly facilitating the verification of causality. Several test cases are presented to illustrate the capabilities of this new method.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© 2019 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alves, L. S. de B., Kelly, R. E. & Karagozian, A. R. 2008 Transverse jet shear layer instabilities. Part II. Linear analysis for large jet-to-crossflow velocity ratios. J. Fluid Mech. 602, 383401.Google Scholar
Alves, L. S. de B. & Barletta, A. 2015 Convective to absolute instability transition in the Prats flow of a power-law fluid. Intl J. Therm. Sci. 94, 270282.Google Scholar
Alves, L. S. de B., Hirata, S. da C. & Ouarzazi, M. N. 2016 Linear onset of convective instability for Rayleigh–Bénard–Couette flows of viscoelastic fluids. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 231, 7990.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1961 The development of three-dimensional disturbances in an unstable film of liquid flowing down an inclined plane. J. Fluid Mech. 10, 401419.Google Scholar
Bers, A. 1975 Linear waves and instabilities. In Physique des Plasmas, pp. 117215. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Bers, A. 1983 Space-time evolution of plasma instabilities – absolute and convective. In Basic Plasma Physics, vol. 1, pp. 451517. North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Betchov, R. & Criminale, W. O. 1966 Spatial instability of the inviscid jet and wake. Phys. Fluids 9 (2), 359362.Google Scholar
Bottaro, A., Corbett, P. & Luchini, P. 2003 The effect of base flow variation on flow stability. J. Fluid Mech. 476, 293302.Google Scholar
Brandao, P. V., Alves, L. S. de B. & Barletta, A. 2014 Onset of absolute instability induced by viscous dissipation in the Poiseuille–Darcy–Bénard convection of a Newtonian fluid. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 547, 012039.Google Scholar
Brandao, P. V., Alves, L. S. de B. & Barletta, A. 2015 Onset of mixed convection in a porous medium due to an absolute instability induced by viscous dissipation. In Bifurcations and Instabilities in Fluid Dynamics. ESPCI.Google Scholar
Brevdo, L. 1991 Three-dimensional absolute and convective instabilities, and spatially amplifying waves in parallel shear flows. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. J. Appl. Math. Phys. 42, 911942.Google Scholar
Brevdo, L. 1995 Convectively unstable wave packets in the Blasius boundary layer. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 75 (6), 423436.Google Scholar
Brevdo, L. 2009 Three-dimensional absolute and convective instabilities at the onset of convection in a porous medium with inclined temperature gradient and vertical throughflow. J. Fluid Mech. 641, 475487.Google Scholar
Brevdo, L., Laure, P., Dias, F. & Bridges, T. J. 1999 Linear pulse structure and signalling in a film flow on an inclined plane. J. Fluid Mech. 396, 3771.Google Scholar
Brevdo, L. & Ruderman, M. S. 2009 On the convection in a porous medium with inclined temperature gradient and vertical throughflow. Part II. Absolute and convective instabilities, and spatially amplifying waves. Trans. Porous Med. 80, 153172.Google Scholar
Bridges, T. J. & Morris, P. J. 1984 Differential eigenvalue problems in which the parameter appears nonlinearly. J. Comput. Phys. 55, 437460.Google Scholar
Briggs, R. J. 1964 Electron-stream interaction with plasmas. In Research Monograph, vol. 29. MIT.Google Scholar
Carrière, P. & Monkewitz, P. A. 1999 Convective versus absolute instability in mixed Rayleigh–Bénard–Poiseuille convection. J. Fluid Mech. 384, 243262.Google Scholar
Chomaz, J. M., Couairon, A. & Julien, S. 1999 Absolute and convective nature of the Eckhaus and zigzag instability with throughflow. Phys. Fluids 11 (11), 33693373.Google Scholar
Criminale, W. O. & Kovasznay, L. S. G. 1962 The growth of localized disturbances in a laminar boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 14, 5980.Google Scholar
Deissler, R. J. 1987 The convective nature of instability in plane Poiseuille flow. Phys. Fluids 30, 23032305.Google Scholar
Delache, A., Ouarzazi, M. N. & Combarnous, M. 2007 Spatio-temporal stability analysis of mixed convection flows in porous media heated from below: comparison with experiments. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 50, 14851499.Google Scholar
Gaster, M. 1968 Growth of disturbances in both space and time. Phys. Fluids 11, 723727.Google Scholar
Hirata, S. da C., Alves, L. S. de B., Delenda, N. & Ouarzazi, M. N. 2015 Convective and absolute instabilities in Rayleigh–Bénard–Poiseuille mixed convection for viscoelastic fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 765, 167210.Google Scholar
Hirata, S. C. & Ouarzazi, M. N. 2010 Three-dimensional absolute and convective instabilities in mixed convection of a viscoelastic fluid through a porous medium. Phys. Lett. A 374 (26), 26612666.Google Scholar
Huerre, P. & Monkewitz, P. A. 1985 Absolute and convective instabilities in free shear layers. J. Fluid Mech. 159, 151168.Google Scholar
Huerre, P. & Monkewitz, P. A. 1990 Local and global instabilities in spatially developing flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 22, 473537.Google Scholar
Hwang, Y. & Choi, H. 2006 Control of absolute instability by basic-flow modification in a parallel wake at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 560, 465475.Google Scholar
Juniper, M. P. & Pier, B. 2015 The structural sensitivity of open shear flows calculated with a local stability analysis. Eur. J. Mech. (B/Fluids) 49, 426437.Google Scholar
Kelly, R. E. & Alves, L. S. de B. 2008 A uniformly valid asymptotic solution for the transverse jet and its linear stability analysis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 366, 27292744.Google Scholar
Koch, W. 2002 On the spatio-temporal stability of primary and secondary crossflow vortices in a three-dimensional boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 456, 85111.Google Scholar
Leclercq, C., Pier, B. & Scott, J. F. 2014 Absolute instabilities in eccentric Taylor–Couette–Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 741, 543566.Google Scholar
Lesshafft, L. & Marquet, O. 2010 Optimal velocity and density profiles for the onset of absolute instability in jets. J. Fluid Mech. 662, 398408.Google Scholar
Lingwood, R. J. 1995 Absolute instability of the boundary layer on a rotating disk. J. Fluid Mech. 299, 1733.Google Scholar
Lingwood, R. J. 1997a Absolute instability of the Ekman layer and related rotating flows. J. Fluid Mech. 331, 405428.Google Scholar
Lingwood, R. J. 1997b On the application of the Briggs’ and steepest-descent methods to a boundary-layer flow. Stud. Appl. Maths 98 (3), 213254.Google Scholar
Lingwood, R. J. 1997c On the impulse response for swept boundary-layer flows. J. Fluid Mech. 344, 317334.Google Scholar
Luchini, P. & Bottaro, A. 2014 Adjoint equations in stability analysis. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46, 493517.Google Scholar
Martinand, D., Carrière, P. & Monkewitz, P. A. 2004 Envelope equations for the Rayleigh–Bénard–Poiseuille system. Part 2. Linear global modes in the case of two-dimensional non-uniform heating. J. Fluid Mech. 502, 175197.Google Scholar
Merkine, L. O. 1977 Convective and absolute instability of baroclinic eddies. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 9, 129157.Google Scholar
Monkewitz, P. A. & Nguyen, L. N. 1987 Absolute instability in the near-wake of two dimensional bluff bodies. J. Fluids Struct. 1, 165184.Google Scholar
Monkewitz, P. A. & Sohn, K. D. 1988 Absolute instability in hot jets. AIAA J. 26 (8), 911916.Google Scholar
Oertel, H. Jr & Delfs, J. 1995 Mathematische analyse der bereiche reibungsbehafteter strömungen. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 75, 491505.Google Scholar
Pier, B. 2009 Open-loop control of absolutely unstable domains. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 459, 11051115.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H. 1986 Boundary-Layer Theory, 7th edn. MacGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Strang, G. 1988 Linear Algebra and its Applications, 3rd edn. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Suslov, S. A. 2006 Numerical aspects of searching convective/absolute instability transition. J. Comput. Phys. 212, 188217.Google Scholar
Thacker, W. C. 1975 Spatial growth of gulf stream meanders. Geophys. Fluid Dyn. 7, 271295.Google Scholar
Theofilis, V. 2003 Advances in global linear instability analysis of nonparallel and three-dimensional flows. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 39, 249315.Google Scholar
Theofilis, V. 2011 Global linear instability. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 319352.Google Scholar
Wolfram, S. 2003 The Mathematica Book, 5th edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar