Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T18:22:39.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Helical structure of longitudinal vortices embedded in turbulent wall-bounded flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2009

CLARA M. VELTE ,
MARTIN O. L. HANSEN  and
VALERY L. OKULOV
CLARA M. VELTE*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
MARTIN O. L. HANSEN
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
VALERY L. OKULOV
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Embedded vortices in turbulent wall-bounded flow over a flat plate, generated by a passive rectangular vane-type vortex generator with variable angle β to the incoming flow in a low-Reynolds-number flow (Re = 2600 based on the inlet grid mesh size L = 0.039 m and free stream velocity U∞ = 1.0 ms−1), have been studied with respect to helical symmetry. The studies were carried out in a low-speed closed-circuit wind tunnel utilizing stereoscopic particle image velocimetry (SPIV). The vortices have been shown to possess helical symmetry, allowing the flow to be described in a simple fashion. Iso-contour maps of axial vorticity revealed a dominant primary vortex and a weaker secondary one for 20° ≤ β ≤ 40°. For angles outside this range, the helical symmetry was impaired due to the emergence of additional flow effects. A model describing the flow has been utilized, showing strong concurrence with the measurements, even though the model is decoupled from external flow processes that could perturb the helical symmetry. The pitch, the vortex core size, the circulation and the advection velocity of the vortex all vary linearly with the device angle β. This is important for flow control, since one thereby can determine the axial velocity induced by the helical vortex as well as the swirl redistributing the axial velocity component for a given device angle β. This also simplifies theoretical studies, e.g. to understand and predict the stability of the vortex and to model the flow numerically.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 619 , 25 January 2009 , pp. 167 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adrian, R. J. 2007 Hairpin vortex organization in wall turbulence. Phys. Fluids 19, 041301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alekseenko, S. V., Kuibin, P. A., Okulov, V. L. & Shtork, S. I. 1999 Helical vortices in swirl flow. J. Fluid Mech. 382, 195–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1964 Axial flow in trailing line vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 20, 645–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudier, M. P. 1988 Vortex breakdown: observations and explanations. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 25, 189–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godard, G. & Stanislas, M. 2006 Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part 1. Optimization of passive vortex generators. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 10, 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Görtler, H. 1955 Dreidimensionales zur Stabilitätstheorie laminarer Grenzschichten. ZAMM 35, 326.Google Scholar
Heaton, C. J. & Peake, N. 2007 Transient growth in vortices with axial flow. J. Fluid Mech. 587, 271–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuibin, P. A. & Okulov, V. L. 1996 One-dimensional solutions for a flow with a helical symmetry. Thermophys. Aeromech. 3, 297–301.Google Scholar
Leibovich, S. 1978 The structure of vortex breakdown. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 10, 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, J. C. 2002 Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 38, 389–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J., Piomelli, U. & Spalart, P. R. 1996 Interaction between a spatially growing turbulent boundary layer and embedded streamwise vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 326, 151–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okulov, V. L. 1996 The transition from the right helical symmetry to the left symmetry during vortex breakdown. Tech. Phys. Lett. 22, 798–800.Google Scholar
Okulov, V. L. 2004 On the stability of multiple helical vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearcey, H. H. 1961 Shock induced separation and its prevention by design and boundary layer conntrol. In Boundary Layer and Flow Control (ed. Lachmann, G. V.), vol. 2, pp. 1166–1344. Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, R. T. 1980 A family of steady, translating vortex pairs with distributed vorticity. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, J. J. 1997 Experimental and numerical investigation of separated flows. PhD thesis, Tehcnical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby.Google Scholar
Schubauer, G. B. & Spangenberg, W. G. 1960 Forced mixing in boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 8, 10–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabaka, I. M. M. A., Mehta, R. D. & Bradshaw, P. 1985 Longitudinal vortices imbedded in turbulent boundary layers. Part 1. Single vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 155, 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, F. T. 1994 Theoretical prediction and design for vortex generators in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 270, 91–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, H. D. 1947 The elimination of diffuser separation by vortex generators. Research Department Report No. R-4012-3. United Aircraft Corporation, East Hartford, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Velte, C. M., Hansen, M. O. L. & Cavar, D. 2008 Flow analysis of vortex generators on wing sections by stereoscopic particle image velocimetry measurements. Environ. Res. Lett. 3, 1–11 015006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You, D., Wang, M., Mittal, R. & Moin, P. 2006 Large-eddy simulations of longitudinal vortices embedded in a turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J. 44, 3032–3039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar