Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T09:01:28.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gravity currents impinging on bottom-mounted square cylinders: flow fields and associated forces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2009

E. GONZALEZ-JUEZ ,
E. MEIBURG  and
G. CONSTANTINESCU
E. GONZALEZ-JUEZ
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5070, USA
E. MEIBURG*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5070, USA
G. CONSTANTINESCU
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The unsteady drag and lift generated by the interaction of a gravity current with a bottom-mounted square cylinder are investigated by means of high-resolution Navier–Stokes simulations. Two-dimensional simulations for Reynolds numbers (Re) O(1000) and three-dimensional simulations for Re = O(10000) demonstrate that the drag coefficient increases exponentially towards a maximum as the current meets the cylinder, then undergoes strong fluctuations and eventually approaches a quasi-steady value. The simulation results show that the maximum drag coefficient can reach a value of 3, with the quasi-steady value being O(1), which should aid in selecting a design drag coefficient for submarine structures under the potential impact of gravity currents. The transient drag and lift fluctuations after impact are associated with the Kelvin–Helmholtz vortices in the mixing layer between the gravity current and the ambient fluid. As these vortices pass over the cylinder, they cause the convection of separated flow regions along the bottom wall towards the cylinder. In two-dimensional simulations at Re = O(10000), these flow structures are seen to be unrealistically coherent and to persist throughout the interaction, thus resulting in a noticeable overprediction of the drag and lift fluctuations. On the other hand, the impact of the current on the cylinder is seen to be very well captured by two-dimensional simulations at all Re values. Three-dimensional simulations lead to excellent agreement with available experimental data throughout the flow/structure interaction. They show that the spanwise variation of the drag is determined by the gravity current's lobe-and-cleft structure at impact and by an unsteady cellular flow structure similar to that found in constant-density flows at later times. A comparison between gravity-current flows and corresponding constant-density flows shows the hydrostatic drag component to be important for gravity currents.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 631 , 25 July 2009 , pp. 65 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baines, P. G. 1995 Topographic Effects in Stratified Flows. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bearman, P. W. & Zdravkovich, M. M. 1978 Flow around a circular cylinder near a plane boundary. J. Fluid Mech. 89, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1968 Gravity currents and related phenomena. J. Fluid Mech. 31, 209–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birman, V. K., Battandier, B. A., Meiburg, E. & Linden, P. F. 2007 Lock-exchange flows in sloping channels. J. Fluid Mech. 577, 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birman, V. K., Martin, J. E. & Meiburg, E. 2005 The non-Boussinesq lock-exchange problem. Part 2. High-resolution simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 537, 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchette, F., Strauss, M., Meiburg, E., Kneller, B. & Glinsky, M. E. 2005 High-resolution numerical simulations of resuspending gravity currents: conditions for self-sustainment. J. Geophys. Res. 110, C12022, doi:10.1029/2005JC002927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnecaze, R. T., Huppert, H. E. & Lister, J. R. 2006 Particle-driven gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 250, 339–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnecaze, R. T. & Lister, J. R. 1999 Particle-driven gravity currents down planar slopes. J. Fluid Mech. 390, 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruschi, R., Bughi, S., Spinazze, M., Torselletti, E. & Vitali, L. 2006 Impact of debris flows and turbidity currents on seafloor structures. Norw. J. Geol. 86, 317–337.Google Scholar
Cantero, M. I., Lee, J. R., Balachandar, S. & Garcia, M. H. 2007 On the front velocity of gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 586, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, I. P. 2002 Weakly stratified laminar flow past normal flat plates. J. Fluid Mech. 454, 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernyshenko, S. I. & Castro, I. P. 1996 High-Reynolds-number weakly stratified flow past an obstacle. J. Fluid Mech. 317, 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomaz, J. M., Bonneton, P. & Hopfinger, E. J. 1993 The structure of the near wake of a sphere moving horizontally in a stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 254, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doligalski, T. L., Smith, C. R. & Walker, J. D. A. 1994 Vortex interactions with walls. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 26 (1), 573–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ermanyuk, E. V. & Gavrilov, N. V. 2005 a Interaction of an internal gravity current with an obstacle on the channel bottom. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 46 (4), 489–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ermanyuk, E. V. & Gavrilov, N. V. 2005 b Interaction of an internal gravity current with a submerged circular cylinder. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 46 (2), 216–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P. & Cabot, W. H. 1991 A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. Fluids A 3 (7), 1760–1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Juez, E. D., Constantinescu, S. G. & Meiburg, E. 2007 A study of the interaction of a gravity current with a square cylinder using two-dimensional numerical simulations. In Proceedings of the 26th Intl Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, San Diego, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenspan, H. P. & Young, R. E. 1978 Flow over a containment dyke. J. Fluid Mech. 87, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Härtel, C., Meiburg, E. & Necker, F. 2000 Analysis and direct numerical simulation of the flow at a gravity-current head. Part 1. Flow topology and front speed for slip and no-slip boundaries. J. Fluid Mech. 418, 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopfinger, E. J. 1983 Snow avalanche motion and related phenomena. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 15, 47–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huppert, H. & Simpson, J. 1980 The slumping of gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 785–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. B. & Lee, S. J. 2001 Time-resolved velocity field measurements of separated flow in front of a vertical fence. Exp. Fluids 31 (3), 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koumoutsakos, P. & Leonard, A. 1995 High-resolution simulations of the flow around an impulsively started cylinder using vortex methods. J. Fluid Mech. 296, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane-Serff, G. F., Beal, L. M. & Hadfield, T. D. 1995 Gravity current flow over obstacles. J. Fluid Mech. 292, 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilly, D. K. 1992 A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method. Phys. Fluids A 4 (3), 633–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, R. J., Rottman, J. W. & Linden, P. F. 2005 The non-Boussinesq lock-exchange problem. Part 1. Theory and experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 537, 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinuzzi, R. & Tropea, C. 1993 The flow around surface-mounted, prismatic obstacles placed in a fully developed channel flow. J. Fluids Engng 115 (1), 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittal, R. & Balachandar, S. 1995 Effect of three-dimensionality on the lift and drag of nominally two-dimensional cylinders. Phys. Fluids 7 (8), 1841–1865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Necker, F., Hartel, C., Kleiser, L. & Meiburg, E. 2002 High-resolution simulations of particle-driven gravity currents. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 28 (2), 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Necker, F., Härtel, C., Kleiser, L. & Meiburg, E. 2005 Mixing and dissipation in particle-driven gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 545, 339–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ooi, S. K., Constantinescu, S. G. & Weber, L. 2005 Two-dimensional large eddy simulation of lock-exchange gravity current flows. In Proceedings of the 31st Intl Association Hydraulic Research Congress, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
Ooi, S. K., Constantinescu, S. G. & Weber, L. 2007 Numerical simulations of lock-exchange compositional gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. In press.Google Scholar
Pierce, C. D. 2001 Progress-variable approach for large eddy simulation of turbulent combustion. PhD thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Pierce, C. D. & Moin, P. 2004 Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion. J. Fluid Mech. 504, 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roshko, A. 1993 Perspectives on bluff-body aerodynamics. J. Wind Engng Indus. Aerodyn. 49 (1–3), 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rottman, J. W. & Simpson, J. E. 1983 Gravity currents produced by instantaneous releases of a heavy fluid in a rectangular channel. J. Fluid Mech. 135, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rottman, J. W., Simpson, J. E., Hunt, J. C. R. & Britter, R. E. 1985 Unsteady gravity current flows over obstacles: Some observations and analysis related to the phase II trials. J. Hazard. Mater. 11 (1–4), 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, J. O., Dalziel, S. B. & Linden, P. F. 2004 Gravity currents produced by lock exchange. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. E. 1997 Gravity Currents in the Environment and the Laboratory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sohankar, A., Norberg, C. & Davidson, L. 1999 Simulation of three-dimensional flow around a square cylinder at moderate Reynolds numbers. Phys. Fluids 11 (2), 288–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spedding, G. R., Browand, F. K. & Fincham, A. M. 1996 Turbulence, similarity scaling and vortex geometry in the wake of a towed sphere in a stably stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 314, 53–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, C. H. K. 1996 Vortex dynamics in the cylinder wake. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 28, 477–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, C. H. K. & Govardhan, R. 2004 Vortex-induced vibrations. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 413–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar