Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T17:50:42.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gravity current flow over obstacles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

G. F. Lane-Serff ,
L. M. Beal  and
T. D. Hadfield
G. F. Lane-Serff
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography, The University, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
L. M. Beal
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography, The University, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
T. D. Hadfield
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography, The University, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When a gravity current meets an obstacle a proportion of the flow may continue over the obstacle while the rest is reflected back as a hydraulic jump. There are many examples of this type of flow, both in the natural and man-made environment (e.g. sea breezes meeting hills, dense gas and liquid releases meeting containment walls). Two-dimensional currents and obstacles, where the reflected jump is in the opposite direction to the incoming current, are examined by laboratory experiment and theoretical analysis. The investigation concentrates on the case of no net flow, so that there is a return flow in the (finite depth) upper layer. The theoretical analysis is based on shallow-water theory. Both a rigid lid and a free surface condition for the top of the upper layer are considered. The flow may be divided into several regions: the inflow conditions, the region around the hydraulic jump, the flow at the obstacle and the flow downstream of the obstacle. Both theoretical and empirical inflow conditions are examined; the jump conditions are based on assuming that the energy dissipation is confined to the lower layer; and the flow over the obstacle is described by hydraulic control theory. The predictions for the proportion of the flow that continues over the obstacle, the speed of the reflected jump and the depth of the reflected flow are compared with the laboratory experiments, and give reasonable agreement. A shallower upper layer (which must result in a faster return velocity in the upper layer) is found to have a significant effect, both on the initial incoming gravity current and on the proportion of the flow that continues over the obstacle.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 292 , 10 June 1995 , pp. 39 - 53
Copyright
© 1995 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armi, L. 1986 The hydraulics of two flowing layers with different densities. J. Fluid Mech. 163, 27–58.Google Scholar
Baines, P. G. 1984 A unified description of two-layer flow over topography. J. Fluid Mech. 146, 127–167.Google Scholar
Baines, P. G. 1987 Upstream blocking and airflow over mountains. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 19, 75–97.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1968 Gravity currents and related phenomena. J. Fluid Mech. 31, 209–248.Google Scholar
Dalziel, S. B. 1991 Two-layer hydraulics – a functional approach. J. Fluid Mech. 223, 135–163.Google Scholar
Dalziel, S. B. & Lane-Serff, G. F. 1991 The hydraulics of doorway exchange flows. Building and Environment 26, 121–135.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. E. 1993 Turbidity Currents: Dynamics, Deposits and Reversals. Springer.
Farmer, D. M. & Armi, L. 1986 Maximal two-layer exchange over a sill and through a combination of a sill and a contraction with baratropic flow. J. Fluid Mech. 164, 53–76.Google Scholar
Gröbelbauer, H. P., Fanneløp, T. K. & Britter, R. E. 1993 The propagation of intrusion fronts of high density ratios. J. Fluid Mech. 250, 669–687.Google Scholar
Kneller, B., Edwards, D., McCaffrey, W. & Moore, R. 1991 Oblique reflection of turbidity currents. Geology 14, 250–252.Google Scholar
Lawrence, G. A. 1990 On the hydraulics of Boussinesq and non-Boussinesq two-layer flows. J. Fluid Mech. 215, 457–480.Google Scholar
Rottman, J. W., Simpson, J. E., Hunt, J. C. R. & Britter, R. E. 1985 Unsteady gravity current flows over obstacles: some observations and analysis related to the phase II trials. J. Hazardous Mater. 11, 325–340.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. E. 1982 Gravity currents in the laboratory, atmosphere and ocean. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 14, 213–234.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. E. 1987 Gravity Currents: in the Environment and the Laboratory. Ellis Horwood.
Thorpe, S. A., Hall, A. J. & Hunt, S. 1983 Bouncing internal bores of Ardmucknish Bay, Scotland. Nature 306, 167–169.Google Scholar
Wood, I. R. & Simpson, J. E. 1984 Jumps in layered miscible fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 140, 329–342.Google Scholar
Yih, C. S. & Guha, C. R. 1955 Hydraulic jump in a fluid system of two layers. Tellus 7, 358–366.Google Scholar