Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:01:59.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global three-dimensional optimal disturbances in the Blasius boundary-layer flow using time-steppers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2010

ANTONIOS MONOKROUSOS ,
ESPEN ÅKERVIK ,
LUCA BRANDT  and
DAN S. HENNINGSON
ANTONIOS MONOKROUSOS
Affiliation:
Linné Flow Centre, KTH Mechanics, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
ESPEN ÅKERVIK
Affiliation:
Linné Flow Centre, KTH Mechanics, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
LUCA BRANDT*
Affiliation:
Linné Flow Centre, KTH Mechanics, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
DAN S. HENNINGSON
Affiliation:
Linné Flow Centre, KTH Mechanics, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The global linear stability of the flat-plate boundary-layer flow to three-dimensional disturbances is studied by means of an optimization technique. We consider both the optimal initial condition leading to the largest growth at finite times and the optimal time-periodic forcing leading to the largest asymptotic response. Both optimization problems are solved using a Lagrange multiplier technique, where the objective function is the kinetic energy of the flow perturbations and the constraints involve the linearized Navier–Stokes equations. The approach proposed here is particularly suited to examine convectively unstable flows, where single global eigenmodes of the system do not capture the downstream growth of the disturbances. In addition, the use of matrix-free methods enables us to extend the present framework to any geometrical configuration. The optimal initial condition for spanwise wavelengths of the order of the boundary-layer thickness are finite-length streamwise vortices exploiting the lift-up mechanism to create streaks. For long spanwise wavelengths, it is the Orr mechanism combined with the amplification of oblique wave packets that is responsible for the disturbance growth. This mechanism is dominant for the long computational domain and thus for the relatively high Reynolds number considered here. Three-dimensional localized optimal initial conditions are also computed and the corresponding wave packets examined. For short optimization times, the optimal disturbances consist of streaky structures propagating and elongating in the downstream direction without significant spreading in the lateral direction. For long optimization times, we find the optimal disturbances with the largest energy amplification. These are wave packets of Tollmien–Schlichting waves with low streamwise propagation speed and faster spreading in the spanwise direction. The pseudo-spectrum of the system for real frequencies is also computed with matrix-free methods. The spatial structure of the optimal forcing is similar to that of the optimal initial condition, and the largest response to forcing is also associated with the Orr/oblique wave mechanism, however less so than in the case of the optimal initial condition. The lift-up mechanism is most efficient at zero frequency and degrades slowly for increasing frequencies. The response to localized upstream forcing is also discussed.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 650 , 10 May 2010 , pp. 181 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Åkervik, E., Ehrenstein, U., Gallaire, F. & Henningson, D. S. 2008 Global two-dimensional stability measures of the flat plate boundary-layer flow. Eur. J. Mech. B. Fluids 27, 501–513.Google Scholar
Åkervik, E., Hœpffner, J., Ehrenstein, U. & Henningson, D. S. 2007 Optimal growth, model reduction and control in a separated boundary-layer flow using global eigenmodes. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 305–314.Google Scholar
Alizard, F., Cherubini, S. & Robinet, J.-C. 2009 Sensitivity and optimal forcing response in separated boundary layer flows. Phys. Fluids 21, 064108.Google Scholar
Andersson, P., Berggren, M. & Henningson, D. S. 1999 Optimal disturbances and bypass transition in boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 11, 134–150.Google Scholar
Andersson, P., Brandt, L., Bottaro, A. & Henningson, D. S. 2001 On the breakdown of boundary layers streaks. J. Fluid Mech. 428, 29–60.Google Scholar
Bagheri, S., Åkervik, E., Brandt, L. & Henningson, D. S. 2009 a Matrix-free methods for the stability and control of boundary layers. AIAA J. 47, 1057–1068.Google Scholar
Bagheri, S., Brandt, L. & Henningson, D. S. 2009 b Input–output analysis, model reduction and control of the flat-plate boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 620, 263–298.Google Scholar
Barkley, D., Blackburn, H. M. & Sherwin, S. J. 2008 Direct optimal growth analysis for timesteppers. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 57, 1435–1458.Google Scholar
Blackburn, H. M., Barkley, D. & Sherwin, S. J. 2008 Convective instability and transient growth in flow over a backward-facing step. J. Fluid Mech. 608, 271–304.Google Scholar
Brandt, L., Cossu, C., Chomaz, J.-M., Huerre, P. & Henningson, D. S. 2003 On the convectively unstable nature of optimal streaks in boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 485, 221–242.Google Scholar
Butler, K. M. & Farrell, B. F. 1992 Three-dimensional optimal perturbations in viscous shear flow. Phys. Fluids A 4, 1637–1650.Google Scholar
Cathalifaud, P. & Luchini, P. 2000 Algebraic growth in boundary layers: optimal control by blowing and suction at the wall. Eur. J. Mech. B. Fluids 19, 469–490.Google Scholar
Chevalier, M., Schlatter, P., Lundbladh, A. & Henningson, D. S. 2007 A pseudo spectral solver for incompressible boundary layer flows. Tech. Rep. Trita-Mek 7.Google Scholar
Chomaz, J. M. 2005 Global instabilities in spatially developing flows: non-normality and nonlinearity. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 357–392.Google Scholar
Corbett, P. & Bottaro, A. 2000 Optimal perturbations for boundary layers subject to streamwise pressure gradient. Phys. Fluids 12 (1), 120–130.Google Scholar
Cossu, C. & Chomaz, J. M. 1997 Global measures of local convective instability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4387–90.Google Scholar
Ehrenstein, U. & Gallaire, F. 2005 On two-dimensional temporal modes in spatially evolving open flows: the flat-plate boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 536, 209–218.Google Scholar
Ehrenstein, U. & Gallaire, F. 2008 Two-dimensional global low-frequency oscillations in a separating boundary-layer flow. J. Fluid Mech. 614, 315–327.Google Scholar
Ellingsen, T. & Palm, E. 1975 Stability of linear flow. Phys. Fluids 18, 487–488.Google Scholar
Gallaire, F., Marquillie, M. & Ehrenstein, U. 2007 Three-dimensional transverse instabilities in detached boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 571, 221–233.Google Scholar
Gaster, M. 1975 A theoretical model of a wave packet in a boundary layer over a flat plate. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 347, 271–289.Google Scholar
Gaster, M. & Grant, I. 1975 An experimental investigation of the formation and development of a wave packet in a laminar boundary layer. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 347, 253–269.Google Scholar
Jovanovic, M. R. & Bamieh, B. 2005 Componentwise energy amplification in channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 534, 145–183.Google Scholar
Koch, W. 2002 On the spatio-temporal stability of primary and secondary crossflow vortices in a three-dimensional boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 456, 85–111.Google Scholar
Kreiss, G., Lundbladh, A. & Henningson, D. S. 1994 Bounds for treshold amplitudes in subcritical shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 270, 175–198.Google Scholar
Landahl, M. T. 1980 A note on an algebraic instability of inviscid parallel shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 98, 1–34.Google Scholar
Lehoucq, R. B., Sorensen, D. & Yang, C. 1997 Arpack users' guide: solution of large scale eigenvalue problems with implicitly restarted Arnoldi methods. Tech. Rep. from http://www.caam.rice.edu/software/ARPACK/, Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice University.Google Scholar
Levin, O. & Henningson, D. S. 2003 Exponential vs algebraic growth and transition prediction in boundary layer flow. Flow Turbul. Combust. 70, 183–210.Google Scholar
Luchini, P. 2000 Reynolds-number-independent instability of the boundary layer over a flat surface: optimal perturbations. J. Fluid Mech. 404, 289–309.Google Scholar
Lundell, F. & Alfredsson, P. H. 2004 Streamwise scaling of streaks in laminar boundary layers subjected to free-stream turbulence. Phys. Fluids 16 (5), 1814–1817.Google Scholar
Mamun, C. K. & Tuckerman, L. S. 1995 Asymmetry and Hopf bifurcation in spherical Couette flow. Phys. Fluids 7 (1), 80–91.Google Scholar
Marcus, P. S. & Tuckerman, L. S. 1987 a Simulation of flow between concentric rotating spheres. Part 1. Steady states. J. Fluid Mech. 185, 1–30.Google Scholar
Marcus, P. S. & Tuckerman, L. S. 1987 b Simulation of flow between concentric rotating spheres. Part 2. Transitions. J. Fluid Mech. 185, 31–65.Google Scholar
Marquet, O., Lombardi, M., Chomaz, J. M., Sipp, D. & Jacquin, L. 2009 Direct and adjoint global modes of a recirculation bubble: lift-up and convective non-normalities. J. Fluid Mech. 622, 1–21.Google Scholar
Marquet, O., Sipp, D., Chomaz, J. M. & Jacquin, L. 2008 Amplifier and resonator dynamics of a low-Reynolds-number recirculation bubble in a global framework. J. Fluid Mech. 605, 429–443.Google Scholar
Nayar, M. & Ortega, U. 1993 Computation of selected eigenvalues of generalized eigenvalue problems. J. Comput. Phys. 108, 8–14.Google Scholar
Nordström, J., Nordin, N. & Henningson, D. S. 1999 The fringe region technique and the Fourier method used in the direct numerical simulation of spatially evolving viscous flows. SIAM J. Sci. Comp. 20, 1365–1393.Google Scholar
Orr, W. M. F. 1907 The stability or instability of the steady motions of a perfect liquid and of a viscous liquid. Part I: A perfect liquid. Part II: A viscous liquid. Proc. R. Irish Acad. A 27, 9–138.Google Scholar
Reddy, S. C. & Henningson, D. S. 1993 Energy growth in viscous channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 252, 209–238.Google Scholar
Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 2001 Stability and Transition in Shear Flows. Springer.Google Scholar
Trefethen, L. N., Trefethen, A. E., Reddy, S. C. & Driscoll, T. A. 1993 Hydrodynamic stability without eigenvalues. Science 261, 578–584.Google Scholar
Trefethen, N. & Embree, M. 2005 Spectra and Pseudospectra: The Behaviour of Nonnormal Matrices and Operators. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tuckerman, L. S. & Barkley, D. 2000 Bifurcation analysis for timesteppers. In Numerical Methods for Bifurcation Problems and Large-Scale Dynamical Systems, pp. 453–566. Springer.Google Scholar