Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T11:49:07.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fluid skimming and particle entrainment into a small circular side pore

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Zong-Yi Yan
Affiliation:
The Levich Institute, The City College of The City University of New York, New York NY 10031, USA
Andreas Acrivos
Affiliation:
The Levich Institute, The City College of The City University of New York, New York NY 10031, USA
Sheldon Weinbaum
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The City College of The City University of New York, New York, NY 10031, USA

Abstract

It is a well-known observation in fluidization technology, axial filters and the blood microcirculation that the discharge concentration of a particulate suspension through a small circular side pore which is fed by a large main tube can be significantly lower than the feed concentration. Two underlying mechanisms are believed to be responsible for this exit concentration defect: the fluid skimming from the particle-free layer at the main tube wall and the particle screening due to the hydrodynamic interaction with the pore entrance. In this paper we shall focus our attention only on the first mechanism and shall present a theory which relates the discharge concentration to the dimensionless volume discharge rate 2πQ through the side pore (scaled to the wall shear rate in the main tube and the pore radius) and the ratio of the particle to pore entrance diameters, under creeping flow conditions and for small particle concentrations. First, the shape of the capture tube cross-section upstream of the pore is computed on the basis of a simplified three-dimensional velocity field which neglects the disturbance produced by the orifice on the incoming shear flow. Surprisingly simple closed-form expressions for this shape are derived as Q → ∞ or as Q → 0. Also, using a recently developed exact solution for the simple shear flow past an orifice (Davis 1991), we are able to rigorously demonstrate that, even for small Q, the disturbance produced by the orifice on the shear flow has only a minor effect on the capture tube cross-section far upstream. This simplified flow field is then used to construct a. three-dimensional theory for the discharge concentration defect due to pure fluid skimming for a dilute suspension of spheres. The qualitative features of the theoretical predictions show the same trends as the experimental observations in the microcirculation, although the limits of this theory are well below the observed hematocrit concentrations and the particles are taken as rigid spheres.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1991 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, J. A., Bloembergen, N., Ducing, J. & Pershan, P. S. 1962 Interactions between light waves in a nonlinear dielectric. Phys. Rev. 127, 19181939.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. & Ellis, A. T. 1990 Self-propulsion of asymmetrically vibrating bubbles. J. Fluid Mech. 212, 6580.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. & Strasberg, M. 1958 Excitation of oscillations in the shape of pulsating bubbles — theoretical work. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 30, 697(A).Google Scholar
Berge, P., Pomeau, Y. & Vidal, C. 1984 Orders within Chaos. Wiley.
Carr, J. 1981 Applications of Center Manifold Theory. Springer.
Ciliberto, S. & Gollub, J. P. 1985 Chaotic mode competition in parametrically forced surface waves. J. Fluid Mech. 158, 381398.Google Scholar
Eller, A. J. 1970 Damping constants of pulsating bubbles. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 47, 14691470.Google Scholar
Eller, A. J. & Crum, L. A. 1970 Instability of the motion of a pulsating bubble in a sound field. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 47, 762766.Google Scholar
Feng, Z. C. & Sethna, P. R. 1989 Symmetry-breaking bifurcations in resonant surface waves. J. Fluid Mech. 199, 495518.Google Scholar
Gollub, J. P. & Meyer, C. W. 1983 Symmetry-breaking instabilities on a fluid surface.. Physica D 6, 337346.Google Scholar
Gu, X. M. & Sethna, P. R. 1987 Resonant surface waves and chaotic phenomena. J. Fluid Mech. 183, 543565.Google Scholar
Hall, P. & Seminara, G. 1980 Nonlinear oscillations of non-spherical cavitation bubbles in acoustic fields. J. Fluid Mech. 101, 423444.Google Scholar
Hatwal, H., Mallik, A. K. & Ghosh, A. 1983 Forced nonlinear oscillations of an autoparametric system — Part 2: Chaotic responses. Trans. ASME E: Appl. Mech. 50, 663668.Google Scholar
Kambe, T. & Umeki, M. 1990 Nonlinear dynamics of two-mode interactions in parametric excitation of surface waves. J. Fluid Mech. 212, 373393.Google Scholar
Kaplan, J. & Yorke, J. 1979 Chaotic behavior of multidimensional difference equations. In Functional Differential Equations and the Approximation of Fixed Points (ed. H. O. Peitgen & H. O. Walther). Springer.
Lamb, H. 1932 Hydrodynamics, 6th edn. Cambridge University Press (Dover edition 1945).
Lauterborn, W. & Parlitz, U. 1988 Methods of chaos physics and their application to acoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 19751983.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1989a Monopole emission of sound by asymmetric bubble oscillations. Part 1. Normal modes. J. Fluid Mech. 201, 525541.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1989b Monopole emission of sound by asymmetric bubble oscillations. Part 1. An initial-value problem. J. Fluid Mech. 201, 543565.Google Scholar
Lorenz, E. N. 1963 Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 130141.Google Scholar
Mei, C. C. 1989 Applied Dynamics of Ocean Surfaces Waves. World Scientific.
Mei, C. C. & Ünlüata, U. 1972 Harmonic generation in shallow water waves. In Waves on Beaches (ed. R. E. Meyer), pp. 181202. Academic.
Meron, E. & Procaccia, I. 1986 Low dimensional chaos in surface waves. Theoretical analysis of an experiment.. Phys. Rev. A 34, 32213237.Google Scholar
Miles, J. 1984 Resonantly forced motion of two quadratically coupled oscillators. Physica 13D, 247260.Google Scholar
Minnaert, M. 1933 On musical air bubbles and the sound of running water. Phil. Mag. 16, 235.Google Scholar
Prosperetti, A. 1977 Thermal effects and damping mechanisms in the forced radial oscillations of gas bubbles in liquids. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61, 1727.Google Scholar
Rand, R. H. & Armbruster, D. 1987 Perturbation Methods, Bifurcation Theory and Computer Algebra. Springer.
Sethna, P. R. 1965 Vibrations of dynamical systems with quadratic nonlinearities. Trans. ASME E: J. Appl. Mech., Sept., pp. 576582.Google Scholar
Simonelli, F. & Gollub, J. P. 1989 Surface wave mode interaction: effects of symmetry and degeneracy. J. Fluid Mech. 199, 471494.Google Scholar
Strasberg, M. & Benjamin, T. B. 1958 Excitation of oscillations in the shape of pulsating bubbles experimental work. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 30, 697(A).Google Scholar
Wijngaarden, L. Van 1972 One dimensional flow of liquids containing small gas bubbles. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 4, 369396.Google Scholar
Wijngaarden, L. Van 1980 Sound and shock waves in bubbly liquids. In Cavitation and Inhomogeneities in Underwater Acoustics (ed. W. Lauterborn), pp. 127140. Springer.