Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T02:11:37.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flow in deformable porous media. Part 1 Simple analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Marc Spiegelman
Affiliation:
Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964, USA

Abstract

Many processes in the Earth, such as magma migration, can be described by the flow of a low-viscosity fluid in a viscously deformable, permeable matrix. The purpose of this and a companion paper is to develop a better physical understanding of the equations governing these two-phase flows. This paper presents a series of analytic approximate solutions to the governing equations to show that the equations describe two different modes of matrix deformation. Shear deformation of the matrix is governed by Stokes equation and can lead to porosity-driven convection. Volume changes of the matrix are governed by a nonlinear dispersive wave equation for porosity. Porosity waves exist because the fluid flux is an increasing function of porosity and the matrix can expand or compact in response to variations in the fluid flux. The speed and behaviour of the waves depend on the functional relationship between permeability and porosity. If the partial derivative of the permeability with respect to porosity, ∂kϕ/∂ϕ, is also an increasing function of porosity, then the waves travel faster than the fluid in the pores and can steepen into porosity shocks. The propagation of porosity waves, however, is resisted by the viscous resistance of the matrix to volume changes. Linear analysis shows that viscous stresses cause plane waves to disperse and provide additional pressure gradients that deflect the flow of fluid around obstacles. When viscous resistance is neglected in the nonlinear equations, porosity shock waves form from obstructions in the fluid flux. Using the method of characteristics, we quantify the specific criteria for shocks to develop in one and two dimensions. A companion paper uses numerical schemes to show that in the full equations, viscous resistance to volume changes causes simple shocks to disperse into trains of nonlinear solitary waves.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barcilon, V. & Lovera, O. 1989 Solitary waves in magma dynamics. J. Fluid. Mech. 204, 121133.Google Scholar
Barcilon, V. & Richter, F. M. 1986 Nonlinear waves in compacting media. J. Fluid. Mech. 164, 429448.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Bear, J. 1988 Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. Dover.
Brown, I. 1988 The compositional consequences of two phase flow. Ph. D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
Buck, W. R. & Su, W. 1989 Focused mantle upwelling below mid-ocean ridges due to feedback between viscosity and melting. Geophys. Res. Lett. 16, 641644.Google Scholar
Cheadle, M. 1989 Properties of texturally equilibrated two-phase aggregates. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
Daly, S. F. & Richter, F. M. 1989 Dynamical instabilities of partially molten zones: Solitary waves vs. Rayleigh Taylor plumes. EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 70, 499.Google Scholar
Didwania, A. K. & Homsy, G. M. 1981 Flow regimes and flow transitions in liquid fluidized beds, Intl J. Multiphase Flow 7, 563580.Google Scholar
Didwania, A. K. & Homsy, G. M. 1982 Resonant sideband instabilities in wave propagation in fluidized beds. J. Fluid. Mech. 122, 433438.Google Scholar
Dodd, R., Eilbeck, J., Gibbon, J. & Morris, H. 1983 Solitons and Non-linear Wave Equations. Academic.
Drazin, P. & Johnson, R. 1989 Solitons: an Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Drew, D. 1971 Average field equations for two-phase media. Stud. Appl. Maths 50, 133166.Google Scholar
Drew, D. 1983 Mathematical modeling of two-phase flow. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 15, 261291.Google Scholar
Dullien, F. 1979 Porous Media Fluid Transport and Pore Structure. Academic.
Fowler, A. 1985 A mathematical model of magma transport in the asthenosphere. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 33, 6396.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. 1984 The generation and compaction of partially molten rock. J. Petrol 25, 713765.Google Scholar
Phipps Morgan J. 1987 Melt migration beneath mid-ocean spreading centers. Geophys. Res. Lett. 14, 12381241.Google Scholar
Rabinowicz, M., Nicola, A. & Vigneresse, J. 1984 A rolling mill effect in the asthenosphere beneath oceanic spreading centers. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 67, 97108.Google Scholar
Ribe, N. 1985 The deformation and compaction of partially molten zones. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 83, 137152.Google Scholar
Ribe, N. 1985b The generation and composition of partial melts in the earth's mantle. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 73, 361376.Google Scholar
Ribe, N. 1988a Dynamical geochemistry of the Hawaiian plume. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 88, 3746.Google Scholar
Ribe, N. 1988b On the dynamics of mid-ocean ridges. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 429436.Google Scholar
Ribe, N. & Smooke, M. 1987 A stagnation point flow model for melt extraction from a mantle plume. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 64376443.Google Scholar
Richter, F M. 1986 Simple models of trace element fractionation during melt segregation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 77, 333344.Google Scholar
Richter, F. M & Daly, S. F. 1989 Dynamical and chemical effects of melting a heterogeneous source. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 12,49912,510.Google Scholar
Richter, F. M. & McKenzie, D. 1984 Dynamical models for melt segregation from a deformable matrix. J. Geol. 92, 729740.Google Scholar
Saffman, P. G. 1971 On the boundary condition at the surface of a porous medium. Stud. Appl. Maths 50, 93101.Google Scholar
Scheidegger, A. E. 1974 The Physics of Flow Through Porous Media. University of Toronto Press.
Scott, D. 1988 The competition between percolation and circulation in a deformable porous medium. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 64516462.Google Scholar
Scott, D. & Stevenson, D. 1984 Magma solitons. Geophys. Res. Lett. 11, 11611164.Google Scholar
Scott, D. & Stevenson, D. 1986 Magma ascent by porous flow. J. Geophys. Res. 91, 92839296.Google Scholar
Scott, D. & Stevenson, D. 1989 A self-consistent model of melting, magma migration, and buoyancy-driven circulation beneath mid-ocean ridges. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 29732988.Google Scholar
Sotin, C. & Parmentier, E. M. 1989 Dynamical consequences of compositional and thermal density stratification beneath spreading centers. Geophys. Res. Lett. 16, 835838.Google Scholar
Sparks, D. W. & Parmentier, E. M. 1991 Melt extraction from the mantle beneath spreading centers. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 105, 368377.Google Scholar
Spiegelman, M. 1989 Melting and melt migration: The physics of flow in deformable porous media. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
Spiegelman, M. 1990 Focusing on Freezing: A new mechanism for lateral melt migration at mid-ocean ridges. Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 71, 1829.Google Scholar
Spiegelman, M. 1991 2-D or not 2-D: Understanding melt migration near a sloping, freezing boundary. EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 72, 265.Google Scholar
Spiegelman, M. 1993 Flow in deformable porous media. Part 2. Numerical analysis–the relationship between shock waves and solitary waves. J. Fluid. Mech. 247, 3963.Google Scholar
Spiegelman, N. & McKenzie, D. 1987 Simple 2-D models for melt extraction at mid-ocean ridges and island arcs. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 83, 137152.Google Scholar
Toramaru, A. 1988 Formation of propagation pattern in two-phase flow system with application to volcanic eruption. Geophys. J. R. Astra Soc. 95, 613623.Google Scholar
Von Bargen, N. & Waff, H. S. 1986 Permeabilities, interfacial areas and curvatures of partially molten systems: Results of numerical computations of equilibrium microstructures. J. Geophys. Res. 91, 92619276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar