Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T21:06:43.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The flow due to a two-dimensional jet issuing parallel to a flat plate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

R. A. Sawyer
R. A. Sawyer
Affiliation:
Engineering Department, Cambridge University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An experiment has been performed to determine the cavity pressure and cavity length for the flow under a curved two-dimensional turbulent jet discharging parallel to a flat plate at some distance from the surface. The measurements agree quite closely with the predictions of a simple analysis of the flow when a value is assigned to the spread parameter for the curved jet which is somewhat different from that for the plane jet.

Detailed pressure and velocity measurements show that the rate of growth of the curved jet is in fact closely similar to that of the plane jet. This suggests that the adjustment of the spread parameter should be regarded simply as a convenient device for taking into account the quantitative errors of the assumptions made in the analysis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 1960 , pp. 543 - 559
Copyright
© 1960 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bourque, C. 1959 M.Sc. Thesis. University of Laval. Also Aero. Quart. 11, 201.
Corrsin, S. & Kistler, A. L. 1954 The free-stream boundaries of turbulent flows. NACA Tech. Note 3133.Google Scholar
Dodds, J. I. 1960 Ph.D. Thesis. Cambridge University.
Förthmann, E. 1934 Über turbulente Strahlausbreitung. Ingen.-Arch. 5, 42. Also NACA Tech. Note 789.Google Scholar
Görtler, H. 1942 Berechnung von Aufgaben der Freien Turbulenz auf Grund eines neuen Näherungsansatzes. Z. angew. Math. Mech. 22, 244.Google Scholar
Head, M. R. 1958 Entrainment in the Turbulent boundary layer. A.R.C. Report no. 20,338.Google Scholar
Ludwieg, H. & Tillman, W. 1951 Investigations of the wall-shearing stress in turbulent boundary layers. NACA Tech. Mem. 1285.Google Scholar
Miller, D. R. & Comings, E. W. 1960 J. Fluid Mech. 7, 237.
Reichardt, H. 1942 Gesetzmässigkeiten der freien Turbulenz. VDI-Forschungsheft, p. 414.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1956 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.
Young, A. D. & Maas, J. N. 1936 The behaviour of a Pitot tube in a transverse total-pressure gradient. A.R.C. Rep. & Mem. no. 1770.Google Scholar