Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T12:27:23.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experiments on the generation of small water waves by wind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

E. J. Plate
Affiliation:
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
P. C. Chang
Affiliation:
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
G. M. Hidy
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Abstract

The generation and growth of small water waves by a turbulent wind has been investigated in a laboratory channel. The evolution of these oscillations with fetch was traced from their inception with amplitudes in the micron range under conditions of steady air flow. The experiments revealed that the waves are generated at all air velocities in small bursts consisting of groups of waves of nearly constant frequency. After travelling for some distance downstream, these wavelets attain sufficient amplitude to become visible. For this condition, a wind speed critical to raise waves is well defined. After the first wavelets appear, two new stages of growth are identified at longer fetches if the air speed remains unchanged. In the first of these, the wave component associated with the spectral peak grows faster with fetch than any other part of the wave spectrum of the initial waves until its amplitude attains an upper limit consistent with Phillips's equilibrium range, which appears to be universal for wind waves on any body of water. If the air flow is not changed, then the frequency of this dominant wave remains constant with fetch up to equilibrium. This frequency tends to decrease, however, with increasing wind shear on the water. In the second stage of growth, only the energy of wave components with spectral densities lower than the equilibrium limit tend to increase with fetch so that the wave spectrum is maintained near equilibrium in the high-frequency range of the spectrum.

The origin of the first waves and the rate of their subsequent growth was examined in the light of possible generating mechanisms. There was no indication that they were produced by direct interaction of the water surface with the air turbulence. Neither could any significant feedback of the waves into the turbulence structure be detected. The growth of the waves was found to be in better agreement with theoretical predictions. Under the shearing action of the wind, the first waves were found to grow exponentially. The growth rates agreed with the estimates from the viscous shearing mechanism of Miles (1962a) to a fractional error of 61% or less. A slight improvement was obtained with the viscous theory of Drake (1967) in which Miles’ model is extended to include the effect of the drift current induced by the wind in the water. Since the magnitude of the water currents observed in the tunnel is very small, this improvement is not significant.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1969 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benjamin, T. B. 1959 J. Fluid Mech. 6, 161.
Blackman, R. B. & Tukey, J. W. 1958 Measurements of Power Spectra from the Point of View of Communications Engineering. New York: Dover.
Bradshaw, P. 1967 J. Fluid Mech. 27, 209.
Clauser, F. 1956 The turbulent boundary layer. Adv. Appl. Mech. 4. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. S. & Hanratty, T. J. 1965 A.I.Ch.E. J. 11, 138.
Drake, R. 1967 The generation of wind waves on open channel flows. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Colorado State University, Department of Civil Engineering, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Drake, R. & Plate, E. J. 1968 The generation of wind waves on open channel flows. Proc. 10th Midwestern Mechanics Conference.
Feldman, S. 1957 J. Fluid Mech. 2, 343.
Gaster, M. 1962 J. Fluid Mech. 14, 222.
Hess, G. D. 1968 Turbulent air now over small water wave. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Hidy, G. M. & Plate, E. J. 1965 Phys. Fluids, 8, 1387.
Hidy, G. M. & Plate, E. J. 1966 J. Fluid Mech. 26, 651.
Hinze, J. O. 1959 Turbulence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Keulegan, G. H. 1951 J. Natl Bur. of Standards, 46, 358.
Klebanoff, P. S. 1954 NACA T.N. 3133.
Laufer, J. 1954 NACA T.R. 1174.
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1952 J. Marine Res. 11, 245.
Miles, J. W. 1960 J. Fluid Mech. 8, 593.
Miles, J. W. 1962a J. Fluid Mech. 13, 433.
Miles, J. W. 1962b J. Fluid Mech. 13, 427.
Phillips, O. M. 1957 J. Fluid. Mech. 2, 417.
Phillips, O. M. 1958 J. Fluid Mech. 4, 426.
Plate, E. J. & Hidy, G. M. 1967 J. Geophys. Res. 72, 4627.
Pond, S., Stewart, R. W. & Burling, R. W. 1963 J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 319.
Sandborn, V. A. & Marshall, R. D. 1965 Local Isotropy in Wind Turbulence. TR CER-65VAS-RDM71, Civil Engineering Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Sutherland, A. 1967 Spectral Measurements and Growth of Wind-generated Water Waves. TR 84, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Tominaga, M. 1964 Bull. Soc. Franco-Japonaise d'’ceanographie, 2, 22.
Willmarth, W. & Wooldridge, C. 1962 J. Fluid Mech. 14, 187.