Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T12:13:15.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental and numerical study of a turbulent boundary layer with pressure gradients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Philippe R. Spalart  and
Jonathan H. Watmuff
Philippe R. Spalart
Affiliation:
NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA Present address: Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, MS 7H-96, PO Box 3707, Seattle, WA 98124-2207, USA.
Jonathan H. Watmuff
Affiliation:
NASA Stanford Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Present address: MCAT Institute, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The boundary layer develops along a flat plate with a Reynolds number high enough to sustain turbulence and allow accurate experimental measurements, but low enough to allow a direct numerical simulation. A favourable pressure gradient just downstream of the trip (experiment) or inflow boundary (simulation) helps the turbulence to mature without unduly increasing the Reynolds number. The pressure gradient then reverses, and the β-parameter rises from −0.3 to +2. The wall-pressure distribution and Reynolds number of the simulation are matched to those of the experiment, as are the gross characteristics of the boundary layer at the inflow. This information would be sufficient to calculate the flow by another method. Extensive automation of the experiment allows a large measurement grid with long samples and frequent calibration of the hot wires. The simulation relies on the recent ‘fringe method’ with its numerical advantages and good inflow quality. After an inflow transient good agreement is observed; the differences, of up to 13%, are discussed. Moderate deviations from the law of the wall are found in the velocity profiles of the simulation. They are fully correlated with the pressure gradient, are in fair quantitative agreement with experimental results of Nagano, Tagawa & Tsuji. and are roughly the opposite of uncorrected mixing-length-model predictions. Large deviations from wall scaling are observed for other quantities, notably for the turbulence dissipation rate. The a1 structure parameter drops mildly in the upper layer with adverse pressure gradient.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 249 , April 1993 , pp. 337 - 371
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antonia, R. A., Teitel, M., Kim, J. & Browne, L. W. B. 1992 Low-Reynolds-number effects in a fully developed turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 236, 579– 605.Google Scholar
Arnal, D., Cousteix, J. & Michel, R. 1976 Couche limite se développant avec gradient de pression positif dans un écoulement turbulent. La Rech. Aérosp. 1976-1, 13– 26.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P. 1965 The effect of wind tunnel screens on nominally two-dimensional boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 22, 679– 688.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P. 1967a The turbulence structure of equilibrium boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 29, 625– 645.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P. 1967b ‘Inactive’ motion and pressure fluctuations in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 241– 258.
Bradshaw, P., Ferriss, D. H. & Atwell, N. P. 1967 Calculation of boundary-layer development using the turbulent energy equation. J. FluidMech. 28, 593– 616.Google Scholar
Cebeci, T. & Smith, A. M. O. 1974 Analysis of Turbulent Boundary Layers. Academic.
Clauser, F. 1954 Turbulent boundary layers in adverse pressure gradients. J. Aero Sei. 21, 91– 108.Google Scholar
Coleman, G. N. & Spalart, P. R. 1993 Direct numerical simulation of a small separation bubble. In Proc. Intl Conf. on Near-Wall Turbulent Flows, Arizona State U., March 15–17, 1993.
Coles, D. E. 1956 The law of the wake in the turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 191– 226.Google Scholar
Coles, D. E. 1957 Remarks on the equilibrium turbulent boundary layers. J. Aero. Sei., 24 495– 506.Google Scholar
Coles, D. E. 1962 The turbulent boundary layer in a compressible fluid. Appendix A: A manual of experimental practice for low-speed flow. Rand. Rep., pp. 35– 74.Google Scholar
Coles, D. E. & Hirst, E. A. 1968 Proc. AFOSR-IFP-Stanford Conf. on Computation of Turbulent Boundary Layers, Stanford, Aug. 18–25, 1968, vol. 2.
Danabasoglu, G., Biringen, S. & Streett, C. L. 1991 Spatial simulation of instability control by periodic suction blowing. Phys. Fluids A 3, 2138– 2147.Google Scholar
Dengel, P. & Fernholz, H. H. 1990 An experimental investigation of an incompressible turbulent boundary layer in the vicinity of separation. J. Fluid Mech. 212, 615– 636.Google Scholar
Fasel, H. F. 1976 Investigation of the stability of boundary layers by a finite-difference model of the Navier–Stokes equations. J. Fluid Mech. 78, 355– 383.Google Scholar
Frei, D. & Thomann, H. 1980 Direct measurements of skin friction in a turbulent boundary layer with a strong adverse pressure gradient. J. Fluid Mech. 101, 79– 95.Google Scholar
Galbraith, R. A. McD. & Head, M. R. 1975 Eddy viscosity and mixing length from measured boundary-layer developments. Aero. Q. 26, 133– 154.Google Scholar
Head, M. 1976 Equilibrium and near-equilibrium turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 73, 1– 8.Google Scholar
Herring, H. J. & Norbury, J. F. 1967 Some experiments on equilibrium boundary layers in favorable pressure gradients. J. Fluid Mech. 27, 541– 549.Google Scholar
Hirt, F. & Thomann, H. 1986 Measurement of wall shear stress in turbulent boundary layers subject to strong pressure gradients. J. Fluid Mech. 171, 547– 562.Google Scholar
Inman, P. N. & Bradshaw, P. 1981 Mixing length in low Reynolds number turbulent boundary layers. AIAA J. 19, 653– 655.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. A. & Coakley, T. J. 1990 Improvements to a nonequilibrium algebraic turbulence model. AIAA J. 28, 2000– 2003.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. A. & King, L. S. 1985 A mathematically simple turbulence closure model for attached and separated turbulent boundary layers. AIAA J. 23, 1684– 1692.Google Scholar
Jones, W. P. & Launder, B. E. 1972 Some properties of sink-flow turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 56, 337– 351.Google Scholar
Konzelmann, U. & Fasel, H. 1991 Numerical simulation of a three-dimensional wave packet in a growing flat plate boundary layer. In Boundary Layer Transition and Control Conf., 8– 12 April 1991, Cambridge. R. Aero. Soc.
McDonald, H. 1968 The effect of pressure gradient on the law of the wall in turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 35, 311– 336.Google Scholar
Nagano, Y., Tagawa, M. & Tsuji, T. 1992 Effects of adverse pressure gradients on mean flows and turbulence statistics in a boundary layer. Eighth Symp. on Turbulent Shear Flows, Sept. 9–11, 1991, Münich. Springer.
Patel, V. C. 1965 Calibration of Preston tube and limitations of its use in pressure gradients. J. Fluid Mech. 23, 185– 208.Google Scholar
Perry, A. E., Henbest, S. & Chong, M. S. 1986 A theoretical and experimental study of wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 165, 163– 199.Google Scholar
Perry, A. E., Lim, K. L. & Henbest, S. M. 1987 An experimental study of the turbulence structure of smooth- and rough-wall boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 437– 466.Google Scholar
Rai, M. M. & Moin, P. 1991 Direct numerical simulation of transition and turbulence in a spatially evolving boundary layer. 10th CFD Conf., June 24–26 1991, Honolulu: AIAA-91-1607.
Samuel, A. E. & Joubert, P. N. 1974 A boundary layer developing in an increasingly adverse pressure gradient. J. Fluid Mech. 66, 481– 505.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H. 1979 Boundary Layer Theory, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill.
Schofield, W. H. 1981 Equilibrium boundary layers in moderate to strong adverse pressure gradients. J. Fluid Mech. 113, 91– 122.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. L., Chew, Y. T., Shivaprasad, B. G. & Shiloh, K. 1981 The structure of a separating turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 113, 23– 90.Google Scholar
Spalart, P. R. 1986 Numerical study of sink-flow boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 172, 307– 328.Google Scholar
Spalart, P. R. 1988a Direct simulation of a turbulent boundary layer up to Rθ = 1410. J. Fluid Mech. 187, 61– 98.Google Scholar
Spalart, P. R. 1988b Direct numerical study of leading-edge contamination. AGARD Symp. on Fluid Dyn. of 3D Turb. Shear Flows and Transition, Oct. 3–6 1988, Turkey.
Spalart, P. R. & Leonard, A. 1986 Direct numerical simulation of equilibrium turbulent boundary layers. In Turbulent Shear Flows 5 (ed. F. J. Durst et al.). Springer.
Spalart, P. R., Moser, R. D. & Rogers, M. M. 1991 Spectral methods for the Navier–Stokes equations with one infinite and two periodic directions. J. Comput. Phys. 96, 297– 324.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. W. 1956 Irrotational motion associated with free turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 593– 606.Google Scholar
Streett, C. L. & Macaraeg, M. G. 1990 Spectral multi-domain for large-scale fluid dynamic simulations. Appl. Numer. Maths 6, 123– 139.Google Scholar
Watmuff, J. H. 1990 An experimental investigation of a low Reynolds number turbulent boundary layer subject to an adverse pressure gradient. 1989 Ann. Res. Briefs, NASA/Stanford Ctr for Turb. Res.Google Scholar
Watmuff, J. H. 1992 A high-speed cross-wire data-reduction algorithm. Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. (submitted.)Google Scholar
Watmuff, J. H., Perry, A. E. & Chong, M. S. 1983 A flying hot-wire system. Exp. Fluids 1, 63– 71.Google Scholar
Watmuff, J. H. & Westphal, R. V. 1989 A turbulent boundary layer at low Reynolds number with adverse pressure gradient. Tenth Australasian Fluid Mech. Conf., Dec. 11–15, 1989, Melbourne.
Wei, T. & Willmarth, W. W. 1989 Reynolds-number effects on the structure of a turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 204, 57– 95.Google Scholar
Wood, D. H. & Westphal, R. V. 1988 Measurements of the free-stream fluctuations above a turbulent boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 31, 2834– 2840.Google Scholar