Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:36:23.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of molecular diffusivities on counter-gradient scalar and momentum transfer in strongly stable stratification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Satoru Komori  and
Kouji Nagata
Satoru Komori
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Kyushu University, Hakozaki, Fukuoka 812-81, Japan
Kouji Nagata
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Kyushu University, Hakozaki, Fukuoka 812-81, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of molecular diffusivities of heat and mass on the counter-gradient scalar and momentum transfer in strongly stable stratification are experimentally investigated in unsheared and sheared stratified water mixing-layer flows downstream of turbulence-generating grids. Experiments are carried out in two kinds of stably stratified water flows. In the case of thermal stratification, the difference between the turbulent fluxes of an active scalar (heat with the Prandtl number of Pr ≈ 6) and a passive scalar (mass with the Schmidt number of Sc ≈ 600) is investigated. In the case of salt stratification, the effects of the molecular diffusion of the active scalar (salt) with a very high Schmidt number of Sc ≈ 600 on the counter-gradient scalar transfer is studied. Comparisons of the effects of molecular diffusivities are also made between thermally stratified water and air (Pr ≈ 0.7) flows. Further, the effects of mean shear on the counter-gradient scalar and momentum transfer are investigated for both stratified cases. Instantaneous temperature, concentration and streamwise and vertical velocities are simultaneously measured using a combined technique with a resistance thermometer, a laser-induced fluorescence method, and a laser-Doppler velocimeter with high spatial resolution. Turbulent scalar fluxes, joint probability density functions, and cospectra are estimated.

The results of the first case show that both active heat and passive mass develop counter-gradient fluxes but that the counter-gradient flux of passive mass is about 10% larger than that of active heat, mostly due to molecular diffusion effects at small scales. The counter-gradient scalar transfer mechanism in stable stratification can be explained by considering the relative balance between the available potential energy and the turbulent kinetic energy as in Schumann (1987). In thermally and salt-stratified water mixing-layer flows with the active scalars of high Prandtl and Schmidt numbers, the buoyancy-induced motions with finger-like structures first contribute to the counter-gradient scalar fluxes at small scales, and then the large-scale motions, which bring fluid back to its original levels, generate the counter-gradient fluxes at large scales. The contribution of the small-scale motions to the counter-gradient fluxes in stratified water flows is quite different from that in stratified air flows. The higher Prandtl or Schmidt number of the active scalar generates both the stronger buoyancy effects and the longer time-oscillation period of the counter-gradient scalar fluxes. The time-oscillation occurs at large scales but the counter-gradient fluxes at small scales persist without oscillating. The mean shear acts to reduce the counter-gradient scalar and momentum transfer at large scales, and therefore the counter-gradient fluxes in sheared stratified flows can be seen only in very strong stratification. The behaviour of the counter-gradient momentum flux in strong stratification is quite similar to that of the counter-gradient scalar flux.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 326 , 10 November 1996 , pp. 205 - 237
Copyright
© 1996 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andre, J. C., De Moor, G., Lacarrere, P., Therry, G. & Du Vachat, R. 1978 Modeling the 24-hour evolution of the mean and turbulent structures of the planetary boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 35, 1861–1883.Google Scholar
Deissler, R. G. 1961 Effects of inhomogeneity and of shear flow in weak turbulent fields. Phys. Fluids 4, 1187–1198.Google Scholar
Deissler, R. G. 1962 Turbulence in the presence of a vertical body force and temperature gradient. J. Geophys. Res. 67, 3049–3062.Google Scholar
Fernando, H. J. S. 1988 The growth of a turbulent patch in a stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 190, 55–70.Google Scholar
Gerz, T. & Schumann, U. 1991 Direct simulation of homogeneous turbulence and gravity waves in sheared and unsheared stratified flows. In Turbulent Shear Flows 7 (ed. F. Durst et al.), pp. 27–45. Springer.
Gerz, T. & Schumann, U. 1996 A possible explanation of counter-gradient fluxes in homogeneous turbulence. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 8, 169–181.Google Scholar
Gerz, T., Schumann, U. & Elghobashi, S. E. 1989 Direct numerical simulation of stratified homogeneous turbulent shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 200, 563–594.Google Scholar
Gerz, T. & Yamazaki, H. 1993 Direct numerical simulation of buoyancy-driven turbulence in stably stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 249, 415–440.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. H. 1981 Fossil turbulence and internal waves. In Nonlinear Properties of Internal Waves (ed. B. J. West). AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 76, pp. 159–179.
Gibson, M. M. & Launder, B. E. 1978 Ground effects on pressure fluctuations in the atmospheric boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 86, 491–511.Google Scholar
Hanazaki, H. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1996 Linear processes in unsteady stably stratified turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 318, 303–337.Google Scholar
Hannoun, I. A., Fernando, H. J. S. & List, E. J. 1988 Turbulence structure near a sharp density interface. J. Fluid Mech. 189, 189–209.Google Scholar
Holliday, D. & McIntyre, M. E. 1981 On potential energy density in an incompressible, stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 107, 221–225.Google Scholar
Holt, S. E., Koseff, J. R. & Ferziger, J. H. 1992 A numerical study of the evolution and structure of homogeneous stably stratified sheared turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 237, 499–539.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R. 1985 Diffusion in the stably stratified atmospheric boundary layer. J. Climate Appl. Met. 24, 1187–1195.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R., Stretch, D. D. & Britter, R. E. 1988 Length scales in stably stratified turbulent flows and their use in turbulence models. In Stably Stratified Flow and Dense Gas Dispersion (ed. J. S. Puttock), pp. 285–321. Clarendon Press.
Itsweire, E. C., Helland, K. N. & Van Atta, C. W. 1986 The evolution of grid-generated turbulence in a stably stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 162, 299–338.Google Scholar
Jayesh & Warhaft, Z. 1994 Turbulent penetration of a thermally stratified interfacial layer in a wind tunnel. J. Fluid Mech. 277, 23–54.Google Scholar
Jayesh, Yoon, K. & Warhaft, Z. 1991 Turbulent mixing and transport in a thermally stratified interfacial layer in decaying grid turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 3, 1143–1155.Google Scholar
Kaltenbach, H.-J., Gerz, T. & Schumann, U. 1994 Large-eddy simulation of homogeneous turbulence and diffusion in stably stratified shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 280, 1–40.Google Scholar
Kanzaki, T. & Ichikawa, Y. 1995 Turbulence structure of a stably stratified grid-generated flow. In Advances in Turbulence V (ed. R. Benzi), pp. 266–270. Kluwer.
Komori, S. 1996 Turbulence structure and CO2 transfer at the air-sea interface and turbulent diffusion in thermally-stratified flows. CGER's Supercomputer Monograph Report, vol. 1, CGER-I021-’96, Centre for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Environment Agency of Japan.
Komori, S. 1980 Turbulence structure in stratified flow. PhD thesis, Dept. Chem. Engng, Kyoto University.
Komori, S., Nagata, K., Kanzaki, T. & Murakami, Y. 1993 Measurements of mass flux in a turbulent liquid flow with a chemical reaction. AIChE J. 39, 1611–1620.Google Scholar
Komori, S., Nagata, K. & Murakami, Y. 1996 Heat and mass transfer in a stable thermally-stratified flow. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 23, 235–245.Google Scholar
Komori, S., Ueda, H., Ogino, F. & Mizushina T. 1983 Turbulence structure in stably stratified open-channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 130, 13–26.Google Scholar
Lienhard, V. & Van Atta, C. W. 1990 The decay of turbulence in thermally stratified flow. J. Fluid Mech. 210, 57–112.Google Scholar
Nagata, K. & Komori, S. 1996 Direct numerical simulation of the Prandtl number effect on the counter-gradient scalar transfer in strong stable stratification. Trans. JSME (in Japanese) (in press).Google Scholar
Pearson, H. J., Puttock, J. S. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1983 A statistical model of fluid-element motions and vertical diffusion in a homogeneous stratified turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 129, 219–249.Google Scholar
Riley, J. J., Metcalfe, R. W. & Weissman, M. A. 1981 Direct numerical simulations of homogeneous turbulence in density-stratified fluids. In Nonlinear Properties of Internal Waves (ed. B. J. West). AIP Conf. Proc. vol. 76, pp. 79–112.
Rohr, J. J., Itsweire, E. C., Helland, K. N. & Van Atta, C. W. 1988 Growth and decay of turbulence in a stably stratified shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 77–111.Google Scholar
Schumann, U. 1987 The countergradient heat flux in turbulent stratified flows. Nucl. Engng Des. 100, 255–262.Google Scholar
Stillinger, D. C., Helland, K. N. & Van Atta, C. W. 1983 Experiments on the transition of homogeneous turbulence to internal waves in a stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 131, 91–122.Google Scholar
Yamada, T. & Mellor, G. 1975 A simulation of the Wangara atmospheric boundary layer data. J. Atmos. Sci. 32, 2309–2329.Google Scholar
Yoon, K. & Warhaft, Z. 1990 The evolution of grid-generated turbulence under conditions of stable thermal stratification. J. Fluid Mech. 215, 601–638.Google Scholar